Forming and norming social media adoption in the corporate sector

Social media increasingly pervade the business context. Despite the widespread fascination with the transformative capabilities of these tools, and an increased observability of online social media practices in the corporate sector, the adoption process at the organizational level as well as its consequences on policies and strategies are currently less understood. To ameliorate this gap, this study sets out to examine adoption patterns and their resulting organizational policies and strategies that influence or are influenced by specific adoption behaviors. In doing so, this study builds on findings of an interpretive case analysis, that integrates insights from various social media strategists, purposively selected from multiple industries. Guided by several technology adoption frameworks -- primarily Orlikowski's structurational analysis - three distinct pathways of social media adoption emerged from the data: (1) early adopters, (2) internal mavericks and (3) bandwagon jumpers. Each pathway is driven by either internal or external social behaviors, and leads to distinct organizational social media practices. Our data shows that existing organizational polices and norms mediate social media adoption practices while in turn, innovative adoption practices transform and influence the emergence of policies and norms in the form of a reflexive feedback mechanism.

[1]  Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi,et al.  A structurational analysis of how course management systems are used in practice , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  J. Mackie,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioural Science , 1965 .

[3]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin , 2009, GROUP.

[4]  A. Giddens Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[5]  Susan Gasson,et al.  Adaptations that Virtual Teams Make so that Complex Tasks Can Be Performed Using Simple E-Collaboration Technologies , 2006, Int. J. e Collab..

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[7]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[8]  Kathryn Zickuhr,et al.  65% of Online Adults Use Social Networking Sites , 2011 .

[9]  Niall Cook,et al.  Enterprise 2.0 , 2008 .

[10]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[11]  Andreas Schulze-Kopp,et al.  Enterprise 2.0 , 2013 .

[12]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1993 .

[13]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[14]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[15]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  A qualitative case study of the adoption and use of an agricultural decision support system in the Australian cotton industry: The socio-technical view , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[17]  Anna Wu,et al.  Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site , 2010, CHI.

[18]  Charo Rodríguez,et al.  Understanding managerial behaviour during initial steps of a clinical information system adoption , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[19]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[20]  Chrisanthi Avgerou The Socio-technical Nature of Information Systems Innovation , 2003 .

[21]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization , 2009, C&T.