Evaluating the Utility of Web-Based Consumer Support Tools Using Rough Sets

On the Web, many popular e-commerce sites provide consumers with decision support tools to assist them in their commerce-related decision-making. Many consumers will rank the utility of these tools quite highly. Data obtained from web usage mining analyses, which may provide knowledge about a user’s online experiences, could help indicate the utility of these tools. This type of analysis could provide insight into whether provided tools are adequately assisting consumers in conducting their online shopping activities or if new or additional enhancements need consideration. Although some research in this regard has been described in previous literature, there is still much that can be done. The authors of this paper hypothesize that a measurement of consumer decision accuracy, i.e. a measurement preferences, could help indicate the utility of these tools. This paper describes a procedure developed towards this goal using elements of rough set theory. The authors evaluated the procedure using two support tools, one based on a tool developed by the US-EPA and the other developed by one of the authors called cogito. Results from the evaluation did provide interesting insights on the utility of both support tools. Although it was shown that the cogito tool obtained slightly higher decision accuracy, both tools could be improved from additional enhancements. Details of the procedure developed and results obtained from the evaluation will be provided. Opportunities for future work are also discussed.

[1]  Myra Spiliopoulou,et al.  Web usage mining for Web site evaluation , 2000, CACM.

[2]  MAGDALINI EIRINAKI,et al.  Web mining for web personalization , 2003, TOIT.

[3]  Jaideep Srivastava,et al.  Web usage mining: discovery and applications of usage patterns from Web data , 2000, SKDD.

[4]  Georgios Paliouras,et al.  Web Usage Mining as a Tool for Personalization: A Survey , 2003, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[5]  Li Chen,et al.  Integrating tradeoff support in product search tools for e-commerce sites , 2005, EC '05.

[6]  Raymond R. Tan,et al.  Rule-based life cycle impact assessment using modified rough set induction methodology , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  Le Gruenwald,et al.  A survey of data mining and knowledge discovery software tools , 1999, SKDD.

[8]  Janusz Zalewski,et al.  Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , 1996 .

[9]  Dominik Slezak,et al.  Association Reducts: A Framework for Mining Multi-attribute Dependencies , 2005, ISMIS.

[10]  Hendrik Blockeel,et al.  Web mining research: a survey , 2000, SKDD.

[11]  Siu Cheung Hui,et al.  A Formal Concept Analysis Approach for Web Usage Mining , 2004, Intelligent Information Processing.

[12]  Theresa Beaubouef,et al.  Rough set spatial data modeling for data mining , 2004 .

[13]  Pawan Lingras,et al.  Interval Set Clustering of Web Users with Rough K-Means , 2004, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[14]  Sung Ho Ha,et al.  Helping Online Customers Decide through Web Personalization , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[15]  Naomie Salim,et al.  Independent Component Analysis and Rough Fuzzy based Approach to Web Usage Mining , 2006, Artificial Intelligence and Applications.

[16]  Daryl H. Hepting Ethics and usability testing in computer science education , 2006, SGCS.

[17]  Dominik Slezak,et al.  Mining Associations for Interface Design , 2007, RSKT.

[18]  Daryl H. Hepting Towards a visual interface for information visualization , 2002, Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Information Visualisation.

[19]  Daryl H. Hepting,et al.  Consumer Decision Support for Product Selection , 2005 .

[20]  Werner Kießling,et al.  Preference Mining: A Novel Approach on Mining User Preferences for Personalized Applications , 2003, PKDD.