Comparison of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a 'sonic' toothbrush in plaque-removing ability. A professional toothbrushing and supervised brushing study.

The purpose of the present study was to compare the Braun/Oral-B Plak Control (D7) and Sonicare (S) in their plaque-removing efficacy. For this study, 35 university students (non-dental) were selected. This was a 2-part study. Prior to each appointment, all subjects were asked to abstain from all oral hygiene procedures for at least 24 h. In Part 1, the efficacy of the toothbrush was studied when one of the investigators brushed the teeth of the panellists. In Part 2, the efficacy of toothbrushing was studied after the students had received professional instruction. The available time for the brushing amounted to a total of 2 min per mouth. Dental plaque was evaluated by means of the Silness and Löe plaque index assessed at 6 sites per tooth. Results showed that both in Part 2 and Part 1 the D7 removed significantly more plaque than the S-electric toothbrush. The plaque reduction assessed according to Silness and Löe in Part 1 was for the D7, 1.28 and for the S, 1.12. In Part 2, the reductions were 0.90 and 0.80, respectively. The majority (n = 34) of subjects preferred the D7 over the S. In conclusion, the results of the present study show that the oscillating/rotating toothbrush (Braun/ Oral-B Plak Control) is more effective in plaque removal than the sonic electric toothbrush (Sonicare). In addition, given a choice, the panellists preferred the oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush.

[1]  Cees G. M. Snoek,et al.  Comparison of 2 electric toothbrushes in plaque-removing ability. Professional and supervised brushing. , 1995, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  R. Moran,et al.  Problems Associated with Estimation of Net Calcium Uptake During Enamel Formation Using 45Ca , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[3]  W. Dembling,et al.  A comparative clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush. , 1995, The Journal of clinical dentistry.

[4]  C. McInnes,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new sonic toothbrush. , 1994, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  K. Stoltze,et al.  Comparison of a manual and a new electric toothbrush for controlling plaque and gingivitis. , 1994, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[6]  M. Timmerman,et al.  The long-term effect of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush on gingivitis. An 8-month clinical study. , 1994, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[7]  R. Martin,et al.  Fimbria damage and removal of adherent bacteria after exposure to acoustic energy. , 1993, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[8]  G A Van der Weijden,et al.  A comparative study of electric toothbrushes for the effectiveness of plaque removal in relation to toothbrushing duration. Timerstudy. , 1993, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  B. Åsman,et al.  Improved maintenance of plaque control by electrical toothbrushing in periodontitis patients with low compliance. , 1993, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  M. Timmerman,et al.  The plaque-removing efficacy of an oscillating/rotating toothbrush. A short-term study. , 1993, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[11]  C. Barnes,et al.  A comparison of the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover (D5) electric and a manual toothbrush in affecting gingivitis. , 1993, The Journal of clinical dentistry.

[12]  R. Martin,et al.  Reduction in adherence of Actinomyces viscosus after exposure to low-frequency acoustic energy. , 1992, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[13]  H. Löe Mechanical and chemical control of dental plaque. , 1979, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  H. Löe,et al.  PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. II. CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE AND PERIODONTAL CONDTION. , 1964, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.