Web 2.0 and Politics: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election and an E-Politics Research Agenda

The Internet was a major factor in the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign and has become an important tool for political communication and persuasion. Yet, information systems research is generally silent on the role of the Internet in politics. In this paper, we argue that IS is positioned to enhance understanding of the influence of the Internet on politics, and, more specifically, the process of election campaigning using Internet-based technologies such as Web 2.0. In this paper, we discuss how these technologies can change the nature of competition in politics and replace or complement traditional media. Our empirical study on how Web 2.0 technologies were used by the candidates leading up to the 2008 U.S. presidential primaries sheds light on how these technologies influenced candidate performance. Finally, we outline a research agenda highlighting where IS can contribute to the academic discourse on e-politics.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[4]  R. Rice,et al.  The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. , 1984 .

[5]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[6]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[7]  Richard W. Davis.  The Press and American Politics: The New Mediator , 1991 .

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[9]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[10]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Distinguishing Between the Forest and the Trees: Media, Features, and Methodology in Electronic Communication Research , 1994 .

[11]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “word of mouth” , 1995, CHI '95.

[12]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[14]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Recommender systems , 1997, CACM.

[15]  B. Barber.  Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy , 1998 .

[16]  Richard W. Davis.  The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System , 1999 .

[17]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[18]  D. Green,et al.  The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[19]  R. Kohli,et al.  Internet Recommendation Systems , 2000 .

[20]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[21]  Peter Weill,et al.  Place to Space: Migrating to Ebusiness Models , 2001 .

[22]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[23]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  A strategic perspective of electronic democracy , 2001, CACM.

[24]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[25]  M. Mazarr.  Information Technology and World Politics , 2002 .

[26]  Zizi Papacharissi.  The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[27]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation? , 2003 .

[28]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users , 2004 .

[29]  N. Rogers.  Review of "Information technology and world politics, edited by Michael J. Mazarr." New York, Palgrave Macmillan 2002 , 2004 .

[30]  Michael H. Crespin,et al.  The Calculus of Concession , 2004 .

[31]  Pei-Yu Sharon Chen,et al.  The Impact of Online Recommendations and Consumer Feedback on Sales , 2004, ICIS.

[32]  Steve Cayzer,et al.  Semantic blogging and decentralized knowledge management , 2004, CACM.

[33]  D. P. Baron,et al.  Persistent Media Bias , 2004 .

[34]  David P. Redlawsk.  What Voters Do: Information Search During Election Campaigns , 2004 .

[35]  Minh Q. Huynh,et al.  The critical social theory of Jürgen Habermas and its implications for IS research , 2004 .

[36]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Democracy and filtering , 2004, CACM.

[37]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[38]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[39]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[40]  P. Howard.  New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen , 2005 .

[41]  J. Trippi.  The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the Overthrow of Everything , 2005 .

[42]  Frederick J. Riggins,et al.  The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Peter Dahlgren.  The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[44]  J. Habermas.  Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research , 2006 .

[45]  David Tewksbury.  Exposure to the Newer Media in a Presidential Primary Campaign , 2006 .

[46]  Yong Liu.  Word-of-Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue , 2006 .

[47]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[48]  A. Gore.  The Assault on Reason , 2007 .

[49]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Every Blog Has Its Day: Politically-interested Internet Users' Perceptions of Blog Credibility , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[50]  D. West.  Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance , 2007 .

[51]  R. McChesney.  Communication Revolution: Critical Junctures and the Future of Media , 2007 .

[52]  Daniel W. Drezner,et al.  The power and politics of blogs , 2007 .

[53]  Tom Carlson,et al.  Riding the Web 2.0 Wave: Candidates on YouTube in the 2007 Finnish National Elections , 2008 .

[54]  P. Howard,et al.  Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics , 2018 .

[55]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[56]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Peter L. Francia,et al.  The internet in U.S. election campaigns , 2008 .

[58]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Parties, Election Campaigning and the Internet:Toward A Comparative Institutional Approach , 2008 .

[59]  Costas Panagopoulos.  Politicking Online: The Transformation of Election Campaign Communications , 2009 .

[60]  C. Williams,et al.  Facebook Grows Up: An Empirical Assessment of its Role in the 2008 Congressional Elections , 2009 .