Segregation of information in a complex acoustic signal: individual and dialect identity in white-crowned sparrow song

Many bird songs are highly complex acoustic signals that broadcast a variety of information over long distances. General explanations for signal complexity assume that either different signal components are redundant, or that each component conveys a different message. Puget Sound white-crowned sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys pugetensis, song consists of several temporally discrete phrases or components, two of which, the note complex and trill, vary independently across vocal dialects. Previous playback experiments with males suggest that the terminal trill encodes dialect identity. Here we test whether both the note complex and trill encode individual identity, as predicted by the redundancy hypothesis, or whether the note complex alone serves this role, as predicted by the multiple messages hypothesis. Analyses of acoustic variation in note complexes and trills, and results of a neighbour–stranger song discrimination playback experiment support the multiple messages hypothesis. Note complexes were more individually distinctive among males, and males responded stronger when a neighbour's song had a stranger's note complex substituted than when the neighbour's trill was replaced with that of a stranger. The segregation of cues to individual and dialect identity into the note complex and trill phrases, respectively, supports the hypothesis that coding conflicts may be resolved by using different song components for different functions.

[1]  M. D. Beecher.  Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  William N. Tavolga,et al.  Animal Sounds and Communication , 1960 .

[3]  J. Bruce Falls,et al.  Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. III. Song features used in individual recognition , 1975 .

[4]  J. Soha,et al.  Perception of geographical variation in song by male Puget Sound white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys pugetensis , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Douglas G. Richards,et al.  Alerting and Message Components in Songs of Rufous-Sided Towhees , 1981 .

[6]  Peter H. Becker,et al.  7 – The Coding of Species-Specific Characteristics in Bird Sounds , 1982 .

[7]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and male—male competition: Causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto) , 2002 .

[8]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana) , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  T. Hahn,et al.  Long-Term Persistence of Song Dialects in the Mountain White-Crowned Sparrow , 1999 .

[10]  JULIA FISCHER,et al.  Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrectPvalues: examples fromAnimal Behaviour , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  M. Lein,et al.  Song repertoires of Puget Sound White-crowned Sparrows Zonotrichia leucophrys pugetensis , 1996 .

[12]  Karen I. Hallberg,et al.  Cultural Evolution of Puget Sound White‐Crowned Sparrow Song Dialects , 2004 .

[13]  I. Charrier,et al.  A review of social recognition in pinnipeds , 2003 .

[14]  J. Soha,et al.  Male and Female White-crowned Sparrows Respond Differently to Geographic Variation in Song , 2004 .

[15]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Neighbour–stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  P. Klopfer,et al.  Perspectives in Ethology , 1973, Springer US.

[17]  C. Beer.  Individual Recognition of Voice in the Social Behavior of Birds , 1971 .

[18]  P. Stoddard,et al.  Acoustic adaptations for parent-offspring recognition in swallows. , 1986, Experimental biology.

[19]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[20]  T. Guilford,et al.  Conspicuousness and Diversity in Animal Signals , 1997 .

[21]  D. A. Nelson.  Song frequency as a cue for recognition of species and individuals in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). , 1989, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[23]  P. Marler,et al.  A species-specific acoustic cue for selective song learning in the white-crowned sparrow , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  L. Baptista.  Geographic Variation in Song and Dialects of the Puget Sound White-Crowned Sparrow , 1977 .

[25]  D. Todt,et al.  Imitation and Invention in Song Learning in Nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos B., Turdidae) , 2002 .

[26]  K. Riebel,et al.  Temporal variation in chaffinch Fringilla coelebs song: interrelations between the trill and flourish , 2004 .

[27]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Acoustic communication in birds , 2003 .

[28]  G. Hancock,et al.  The Quest for α: Developments in Multiple Comparison Procedures in the Quarter Century Since Games (1971) , 1996 .

[29]  D. Papaj,et al.  Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  R. H. Wiley,et al.  Communication with Shared Song Themes in Tufted Titmice , 1983 .

[31]  E. Temeles.  The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'? , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  D. A. Nelson.  Song overproduction, selective attrition and song dialects in the white-crowned sparrow , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  Neighbor/Stranger Song Discrimination in White-Crowned Sparrows , 1981 .

[34]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[35]  C. Rowe.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  R. Haven Wiley.  Multidimensional Variation in an Avian Display: Implications for Social Communication , 1975, Science.

[37]  Peter Marler,et al.  Bird songs and mate selection , 1958 .

[38]  D. A. Nelson,et al.  Ecological and Phylogenetic Effects on Song Sharing in Songbirds , 2005 .

[39]  C. Catchpole.  Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Song and Brain Structure in Acrocephalus Warblers , 2000 .

[40]  S. Elfström.  Responses of territorial meadow pipits to strange and familiar song phrases in playback experiments , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  A. Dhondt,et al.  Individual Voice Discrimination in Birds , 1995 .

[42]  Peter Marler,et al.  The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. , 1990 .

[43]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Multiple Displays in Animal Communication:`Backup Signals' and `Multiple Messages' , 1996 .

[44]  RESPONSES OF ADULT WHITE-CROWNED SPARROWS TO PLAYBACK OF SONG PHRASES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ONTOGENY OF SONG RECOGNITION , 2002 .

[45]  P. Parker,et al.  Genetic analysis of song dialect populations in Puget Sound white-crowned sparrows , 2004 .