Design issues in case-control studies

The most difficult and most important considerations in planning the protocol of a case-control study are ascertainment of cases, selection of controls and the quality of the exposure measurement. Plans to ensure careful field work are equally important; without attention to data collection, the protocol will be meaningless. In most case-control studies, the measurement problem is magnified because one cannot implement the collection of exposure information at the beginning of follow-up, and instead must rely on interviews, existing records or extrapolation into the past. Consideration of a case-control study as an efficient way to study a cohort helps to resolve some design issues.

[1]  J. Robins,et al.  Control sampling strategies for case-crossover studies: an assessment of relative efficiency. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Risk of renal cell cancer in relation to diuretics, antihypertensive drugs, and hypertension. , 1995, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[3]  L. Robison,et al.  Random-digit dialing for control selection in childhood cancer studies: the geographic proximity and demographics within matched sets. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[4]  R. Carroll,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Logistic Case-Control Studies , 1995 .

[5]  S Wacholder,et al.  When Measurement Errors Correlate with Truth: Surprising Effects of Nondifferential Misclassification , 1995, Epidemiology.

[6]  Igor Sartori,et al.  Triggering of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Heavy Physical Exertion: Protection against Triggering by Regular Exertion: , 1995 .

[7]  T V Perneger,et al.  Risk of kidney failure associated with the use of acetaminophen, aspirin, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  T D Berry,et al.  Objective system for interviewer performance evaluation for use in epidemiologic studies. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  D Clayton,et al.  Sampling strategies in nested case-control studies. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  D. Thomas,et al.  Comparison of control subjects recruited by random digit dialing and area survey. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  S Greenland,et al.  When will nondifferential misclassification of an exposure preserve the direction of a trend? , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  R. Hayes,et al.  Are racial differences in squamous cell esophageal cancer explained by alcohol and tobacco use? , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  C R Weinberg,et al.  Flexible maximum likelihood methods for assessing joint effects in case-control studies with complex sampling. , 1994, Biometrics.

[14]  R. F. Potthoff Telephone sampling in epidemiologic research: to reap the benefits, avoid the pitfalls. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  R. Carroll,et al.  The partial questionnaire design for case-control studies. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  J. Benichou,et al.  A comparison of three approaches to estimate exposure-specific incidence rates from population-based case-control data. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Jack A. Taylor,et al.  Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  C. Friedenreich,et al.  Improving long-term recall in epidemiologic studies. , 1994, Epidemiology.

[19]  D. Cramer,et al.  Telephone answering machines: the influence of leaving messages on telephone interviewing response rates. , 1993, Epidemiology.

[20]  N. Auriat,et al.  “MY WIFE KNOWS BEST” A COMPARISON OF EVENT DATING ACCURACY BETWEEN THE WIFE, THE HUSBAND, THE COUPLE, AND THE BELGIUM POPULATION REGISTER , 1993 .

[21]  S Wacholder,et al.  Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  S Wacholder,et al.  Validation studies using an alloyed gold standard. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  B Langholz,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of relative mortality from nested case-control studies. , 1993, Biometrics.

[24]  J. Manson,et al.  A comparison of prospective and retrospective assessments of diet in the study of breast cancer. , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  R. Biggar,et al.  Responses to anonymous questionnaires concerning sexual behavior: a method to examine potential biases. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[26]  D C Thomas,et al.  Use of external rates in nested case-control studies with application to the international radiation study of cervical cancer patients. , 1992, Biometrics.

[27]  J K McLaughlin,et al.  Selection of controls in case-control studies. II. Types of controls. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[28]  J K McLaughlin,et al.  Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. Principles. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[29]  J K McLaughlin,et al.  Selection of controls in case-control studies. III. Design options. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  K. Flegal,et al.  Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  Mustafa Dosemeci,et al.  RE: “DOES NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATION OF EXPOSURE ALWAYS BIAS A TRUE EFFECT TOWARD THE NULL VALUE?” , 1991 .

[32]  C R Weinberg,et al.  Randomized recruitment in case-control studies. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[33]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Blind assignment of exposure does not always prevent differential misclassification. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  G R Howe,et al.  An investigation of recall bias in the reporting of past food intake among breast cancer cases and controls. , 1991, Annals of epidemiology.

[35]  R. Hoover,et al.  Diagnostic x-ray procedures and risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. , 1991, JAMA.

[36]  S Wacholder,et al.  Selecting an efficient design for assessing exposure-disease relationships in an assembled cohort. , 1991, Biometrics.

[37]  S Wacholder,et al.  Practical considerations in choosing between the case-cohort and nested case-control designs. , 1991, Epidemiology.

[38]  M. Maclure The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[39]  P. Prorok,et al.  The case-control design and the assessment of the efficacy of cancer screening. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[40]  C R Weinberg,et al.  The design and analysis of case-control studies with biased sampling. , 1990, Biometrics.

[41]  J. Mclaughlin,et al.  Comparison of next-of-kin with self-respondents regarding questions on cigarette, coffee, and alcohol consumption. , 1990, Epidemiology.

[42]  J. Robins,et al.  The Validity of Case'Control Studies with Nonrandom Selection of Controls , 1990, Epidemiology.

[43]  E. Greenberg Random digit dialing for control selection. A review and a caution on its use in studies of childhood cancer. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[44]  T D Koepsell,et al.  Proxy respondents in epidemiologic research. , 1990, Epidemiologic reviews.

[45]  B Langholz,et al.  Nested case-control and case-cohort methods of sampling from a cohort: a critical comparison. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[46]  S. Walter The feasibility of matching and quota sampling in epidemiologic studies. , 1989, American Journal of Epidemiology.

[47]  S. Wacholder,et al.  A case‐control study of cancer of the esophagus and gastric cardia in linxian , 1989, International journal of cancer.

[48]  M. Werler,et al.  REPORTING ACCURACY AMONG MOTHERS OF MALFORMED AND NONMALFORMIED INFANTS , 1989 .

[49]  S. Harlow,et al.  Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records. The evidence for accuracy of recall. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[50]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  What is directionality? , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[51]  M. Werler,et al.  Reporting accuracy among mothers of malformed and nonmalformed infants. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[52]  A. Lippman,et al.  An investigation of report bias in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[53]  J. Siemiatycki Friendly control bias. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[54]  M. Kramer,et al.  Directionality, timing, and sample selection in epidemiologic research design. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[55]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. , 1988, Science.

[56]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Degree of confounding bias related to smoking, ethnic group, and socioeconomic status in estimates of the associations between occupation and cancer. , 1988, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[57]  N. Pearce,et al.  Case-control studies using other diseases as controls: problems of excluding exposure-related diseases. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[58]  Norman E. Breslow,et al.  Logistic regression for two-stage case-control data , 1988 .

[59]  T R Holford,et al.  Confounding in epidemiologic studies: the adequacy of the control group as a measure of confounding. , 1987, Biometrics.

[60]  S Wacholder,et al.  External comparisons with the case-cohort design. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[61]  J. Mclaughlin,et al.  Reliability of surrogate information on cigarette smoking by type of informant. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[62]  L. Rips,et al.  Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. , 1987, Science.

[63]  D A Grayson,et al.  Confounding confounding. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[64]  J M Robins,et al.  Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding. , 1986, International journal of epidemiology.

[65]  R. L. Prentice,et al.  A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials , 1986 .

[66]  S Wacholder,et al.  Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[67]  J. Robins,et al.  More on "Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies". , 1986, Biometrics.

[68]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Theoretical Epidemiology: Principles of Occurrence Research in Medicine. , 1987 .

[69]  A. Blair,et al.  Comparison of crude and smoking-adjusted standardized mortality ratios. , 1985, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[70]  M Blettner,et al.  Comparing imperfect measures of exposure. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[71]  S Wacholder,et al.  Conditions for confounding of the risk ratio and of the odds ratio. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[72]  A R Feinstein,et al.  The case-control study: valid selection of subjects. , 1985, Journal of chronic diseases.

[73]  P. Hartge,et al.  Excluding controls: misapplications in case-control studies. , 1984, American journal of epidemiology.

[74]  Takashi Yanagawa,et al.  Case-control studies: Assessing the effect of a confounding factor , 1984 .

[75]  J H Lubin,et al.  Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies. , 1984, Biometrics.

[76]  P. Hartge,et al.  Design and methods in a multi-center case-control interview study. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[77]  D. Silverman,et al.  The prevalence of coffee drinking among hospitalized and population-based control groups. , 1983, JAMA.

[78]  S Greenland,et al.  Tests for interaction in epidemiologic studies: a review and a study of power. , 1983, Statistics in medicine.

[79]  S Greenland,et al.  The relative efficiencies of matched and independent sample designs for case-control studies. , 1983, Journal of chronic diseases.

[80]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Design options in epidemiologic research. An update. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[81]  S Greenland,et al.  On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[82]  N. Breslow Design and analysis of case-control studies. , 1982, Annual review of public health.

[83]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Confounding: essence and detection. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[84]  B. Macmahon,et al.  Coffee and cancer of the pancreas. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[85]  S Greenland,et al.  Multivariate estimation of exposure-specific incidence from case-control studies. , 1981, Journal of chronic diseases.

[86]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research: volume 1- The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[87]  R. Regal,et al.  A search for evidence for a paternal age effect independent of a maternal age effect in birth certificate reports of Down's syndrome in New York state. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.

[88]  M. A. Ibrahim,et al.  The case control study: the problem and the prospect. , 1979, Journal of chronic diseases.

[89]  Joseph Waksberg,et al.  Sampling Methods for Random Digit Dialing , 1978 .

[90]  S M McKinlay,et al.  Pair-matching-a reappraisal of a popular technique. , 1977, Biometrics.

[91]  F. D. K. Liddell,et al.  Methods of Cohort Analysis : Appraisal by Application to Asbestos Mining , 1977 .

[92]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. , 1976, American journal of epidemiology.

[93]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  A Hybrid Epidemiologic Study Design Useful in Estimating Relative Risk , 1975 .