Proposed new classification scheme for chemical injury to the human eye.

PURPOSE Various ocular alkali burn classification schemes have been published and used to grade human chemical eye injuries for the purpose of identifying treatments and forecasting outcomes. The ILSI chemical eye injury classification scheme was developed for the additional purpose of collecting detailed human eye injury data to provide information on the mechanisms associated with chemical eye injuries. This information will have clinical application, as well as use in the development and validation of new methods to assess ocular toxicity. METHODS A panel of ophthalmic researchers proposed the new classification scheme based upon current knowledge of the mechanisms of eye injury, and their collective clinical and research experience. Additional ophthalmologists and researchers were surveyed to critique the scheme. The draft scheme was revised, and the proposed scheme represents the best consensus from at least 23 physicians and scientists. RESULTS The new scheme classifies chemical eye injury into five categories based on clinical signs, symptoms, and expected outcomes. Diagnostic classification is based primarily on two clinical endpoints: (1) the extent (area) of injury at the limbus, and (2) the degree of injury (area and depth) to the cornea. CONCLUSIONS The new classification scheme provides a uniform system for scoring eye injury across chemical classes, and provides enough detail for the clinician to collect data that will be relevant to identifying the mechanisms of ocular injury.

[1]  R A Thoft Chemical and thermal injury. , 1979, International ophthalmology clinics.

[2]  C. P. Carpenter,et al.  Chemical burns of the rabbit cornea. , 1946, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  D. Easty,et al.  Report on the COLIPA Workshop on Mechanisms of Eye Irritation. , 1998, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[4]  H. Dua,et al.  A new classification of ocular surface burns , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  David A. Neumann,et al.  Symposium Proceedings: Replacing the Draize Eye Irritation Test: Scientific Background and Research Needs Technical Committee on Alternatives to Animal Testing , 1996 .

[6]  D. Albert,et al.  Principles and practice of ophthalmology , 1999 .

[7]  J V Jester,et al.  Extent of initial corneal injury as a basis for alternative eye irritation tests. , 2001, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[8]  R. Nussenblatt,et al.  Ophthalmologic Perspectives on Eye Irritation Testing , 1998 .

[9]  W M Petroll,et al.  Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury predicts extent of subsequent ocular responses. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  A.W.A. Brown,et al.  3 – Chemical Injuries , 1963 .

[11]  A Proposal for Guideline for Prevention of Allergic Occupational Asthma-in Conformity with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) , 2007, International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology.

[12]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Incidence of emergency department-treated eye injury in the United States. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  G. Smolin,et al.  The Cornea: Scientific foundations and clinical practice , 1983 .

[14]  John H. Draize,et al.  METHODS FOR THE STUDY OF IRRITATION AND TOXICITY OF SUBSTANCES APPLIED TOPICALLY TO THE SKIN AND MUCOUS MEMBRANES , 1944 .

[15]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Rate of eye injury in the United States. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  Roper-Hall Mj Thermal and chemical burns. , 1965 .