The state of the guanosine nucleotide allosterically affects the interfaces of tubulin in protofilament

The dynamics of microtubules is essential for many microtubule-dependent cellular functions such as the mitosis. It has been recognized for a long time that GTP hydrolysis in αβ-tubulin polymers plays a critical role in this dynamics. However, the effects of the changes in the nature of the guanosine nucleotide at the E-site in β-tubulin on microtubule structure and stability are still not well understood. In the present work, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of a αβα-tubulin heterotrimer harboring a guanosine nucleotide in three different states at the E-site: GTP, GDP-Pi and GDP. We found that changes in the nucleotide state is associated with significant conformational variations at the α-tubulin N- and β-tubulin M-loops which impact the interactions between tubulin protofilaments. The results also show that GTP hydrolysis reduces αβ-tubulin interdimer contacts in favor of intradimer interface. From an atomistic point view, we propose a role for α-tubulin glutamate residue 254 in catalytic magnesium coordination and identified a water molecule in the nucleotide binding pocket which is most probably required for nucleotide hydrolysis. Finally, the results are discussed with reference to the role of taxol in microtubule stability and the recent tubulin-sT2R crystal structures.

[1]  G. Borisy,et al.  Structural polarity and directional growth of microtubules of Chlamydomonas flagella. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  M. Caplow,et al.  Microtubule dynamic instability does not result from stabilization of microtubules by tubulin-GDP-Pi subunits. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[4]  G. Voth,et al.  Intrinsic bending of microtubule protofilaments. , 2011, Structure.

[5]  E. Hamel,et al.  The magnesium-GTP interaction in microtubule assembly. , 1994, European journal of biochemistry.

[6]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[7]  Gordon W. Slysz,et al.  Structural mass spectrometry of the alpha beta-tubulin dimer supports a revised model of microtubule assembly. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[8]  A. Sali,et al.  Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[9]  M. Caplow,et al.  The free energy for hydrolysis of a microtubule-bound nucleotide triphosphate is near zero: all of the free energy for hydrolysis is stored in the microtubule lattice [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1995 Apr;129(2):549] , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  M. Caplow,et al.  Evidence that a single monolayer tubulin-GTP cap is both necessary and sufficient to stabilize microtubules. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[11]  Marcel Knossow,et al.  The determinants that govern microtubule assembly from the atomic structure of GTP-tubulin. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  H. Erickson,et al.  Guanosinetriphosphatase activity of tubulin associated with microtubule assembly. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Y. Devary,et al.  Dissection of the GTPase mechanism of Ras protein by MD analysis of Ras mutants , 2005, Proteins.

[14]  E. Nogales,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent bending flexibility of tubulin regulates microtubule assembly , 2005, Nature.

[15]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Relating molecular flexibility to function: a case study of tubulin. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[16]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[17]  Adel Golovin,et al.  MSDmotif: exploring protein sites and motifs , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  E. Salmon,et al.  Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  A. Klug,et al.  Arrangement of subunits in flagellar microtubules. , 1974, Journal of cell science.

[20]  D. Panda,et al.  Determination of the size and chemical nature of the stabilizing "cap" at microtubule ends using modulators of polymerization dynamics. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[21]  H. Erickson,et al.  GTP hydrolysis during microtubule assembly. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[22]  E. Nogales,et al.  Tubulin and FtsZ form a distinct family of GTPases , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  J. Correia,et al.  Tubulin exchanges divalent cations at both guanine nucleotide-binding sites. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  E. Nogales,et al.  Structural mechanisms underlying nucleotide-dependent self-assembly of tubulin and its relatives. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[25]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[26]  M. Carlier,et al.  Hydrolysis of GTP associated with the formation of tubulin oligomers is involved in microtubule nucleation. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Adel Golovin,et al.  MSDsite: A database search and retrieval system for the analysis and viewing of bound ligands and active sites , 2004, Proteins.

[28]  Adel Golovin,et al.  Chemical Substructure Search in SQL , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[29]  M. Carlier,et al.  Microtubule elongation and guanosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis. Role of guanine nucleotides in microtubule dynamics. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[30]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[31]  R. Burns α‐, β‐, and γ‐tubulins: Sequence comparisons and structural constraints , 1991 .

[32]  B. Spiegelman,et al.  Turnover of tubulin and the N site GTP in chinese hamster ovary cells , 1977, Cell.

[33]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[34]  E. Nogales,et al.  A common pharmacophore for epothilone and taxanes: molecular basis for drug resistance conferred by tubulin mutations in human cancer cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Agard,et al.  The lattice as allosteric effector: Structural studies of αβ- and γ-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[37]  Heather A. Carlson,et al.  Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[39]  Arpita Mitra,et al.  Taxol allosterically alters the dynamics of the tubulin dimer and increases the flexibility of microtubules. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[40]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[41]  R. Buey,et al.  The nucleotide switch of tubulin and microtubule assembly: a polymerization-driven structural change. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[42]  R. Maccioni,et al.  Involvement of the carboxyl-terminal domain of tubulin in the regulation of its assembly. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  G. Voth,et al.  Intrinsic bending and structural rearrangement of tubulin dimer: molecular dynamics simulations and coarse-grained analysis. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[44]  Patrick A. Curmi,et al.  Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain , 2004, Nature.

[45]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[46]  E. Nogales,et al.  Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Microtubule polymerization dynamics. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[48]  E. Nogales Structural insight into microtubule function. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[49]  Kenneth H. Downing,et al.  Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography , 1998, Nature.

[50]  Arpita Mitra,et al.  Dinitroanilines Bind α-Tubulin to Disrupt Microtubules , 2004 .

[51]  D. Odde,et al.  Microtubule Assembly Dynamics at the Nanoscale , 2007, Current Biology.