Current Perspectives on HER2 Testing: A Review of National Testing Guidelines

Knowledge of HER2 status is a prerequisite when considering a patient's eligibility for Herceptin (trastuzumab) therapy. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential to ensure that all patients who may benefit from Herceptin are correctly identified. There are several assays available to determine HER2 status: the most common in routine clinical practice are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Various factors can affect the results achieved with these assays, including the assay antibody/probe, the methodology and the experience of personnel. Many countries have implemented national testing guidelines in an attempt to standardize testing procedures and make results more accurate. These guidelines vary in the level of detail and the number of recommendations. This review looks at areas of consensus between the different national testing guidelines and highlights where errors may arise during the testing procedure. The key point underlined by this review is that whatever method is used to test for HER2 status, the technology must be validated first, and there must be regular internal and external quality control and quality assurance procedures.

[1]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Current Status of HER2 Testing , 2002, Oncology.

[2]  M. Piccart,et al.  Moving Forward: Herceptin® in the Adjuvant Setting , 2002, Oncology.

[3]  Frédérique Penault-Llorca,et al.  [Immunochemistry evaluation of HER2 status in infiltration breast cancer: technical protocol and interpretation guidelines]. , 2002, Annales de pathologie.

[4]  W. Carney,et al.  Elevated serum Her-2/neu level predicts decreased response to hormone therapy in metastatic breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  M. Bilous Predicting HER2 status of breast cancer from basic pathology features: HER2 status of 1500 breast cancers determined by immunohistochemistry and flourescence In situ hybridisation with pathology correlation , 2002 .

[6]  Lyndsay N Harris,et al.  Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  B. Jasani,et al.  A formalin-fixed, paraffin-processed cell line standard for quality control of immunohistochemical assay of HER-2/neu expression in breast cancer. , 2002, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  I. Smith,et al.  Efficacy and safety of Herceptin® in women with metastatic breast cancer: results from pivotal clinical studies , 2001, Anti-cancer drugs.

[9]  John J Spinelli,et al.  HER-2/neu in Breast Cancer: Interobserver Variability and Performance of Immunohistochemistry with 4 Antibodies Compared with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization , 2001, Modern Pathology.

[10]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Evaluation of HER2 status: For the treatment of metastatic breast cancers by humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab) (Pathological committee for optimal use of trastuzumab) , 2001, Breast cancer.

[11]  D B Evans,et al.  Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  H. Moch,et al.  Patterns of her-2/neu amplification and overexpression in primary and metastatic breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  J. Blondal,et al.  Defining a Test for HER-2/neu Evaluation in Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting , 2001, Modern Pathology.

[14]  Caroline Lohrisch,et al.  The Predictive Value of HER2 in Breast Cancer , 2001, Oncology.

[15]  J. Isola,et al.  Amplification of HER-2/neu and topoisomerase IIalpha in primary and metastatic breast cancer. , 2001, Cancer research.

[16]  I. Bièche,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical assays for HER-2/neu status determination: application to node-negative breast cancer. , 2001, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[17]  M. Gnant,et al.  Evaluation of the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring and test system of HER-2 protein expression in breast cancer. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[18]  T. Grogan,et al.  Discrepancies in clinical laboratory testing of eligibility for trastuzumab therapy: apparent immunohistochemical false-positives do not get the message. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  D. Larsimont,et al.  Evaluation of HER2, p53, bcl-2, topoisomerase II-alpha, heat shock proteins 27 and 70 in primary breast cancer and metastatic ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  I. Andrulis,et al.  Comparison of HER2/neu status assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. , 2001, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Bast,et al.  2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  M. Untch,et al.  Her-2/neu analysis in archival tissue samples of human breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M. Cummings,et al.  HER2 TESTING RECOMMENDATIONS IN AUSTRALIA , 2001, Pathology.

[25]  S. Paik,et al.  HER2 and choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-15. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  I. Ellis,et al.  Recommendations for HER2 testing in the UK , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[27]  M. Fernö,et al.  ErbB2 status and the benefit from two or five years of adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal early stage breast cancer. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  R. Ridolfi,et al.  HER-2/neu Testing in Breast Carcinoma: A Combined Immunohistochemical and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Approach , 2000, Modern Pathology.

[29]  S. Edge,et al.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer , 2005 .

[30]  N. Sneige,et al.  HER-2/neu gene amplification compared with HER-2/neu protein overexpression and interobserver reproducibility in invasive breast carcinoma. , 2000, American journal of clinical pathology.

[31]  D. Larsimont,et al.  Sensitivity of HER-2/neu antibodies in archival tissue samples of invasive breast carcinomas. Correlation with oncogene amplification in 160 cases. , 2000, American journal of clinical pathology.

[32]  E. Frenkel,et al.  Laboratory assessment of the status of Her-2/neu protein and oncogene in breast cancer specimens: comparison of immunohistochemistry assay with fluorescence in situ hybridisation assays , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[33]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: why, when and how? , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[34]  D. Visscher,et al.  Determination of Her-2/Neu Status in Breast Carcinoma: Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization , 2000, Modern Pathology.

[35]  M. Bui,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detection of HER-2/neu amplification in breast cancer: a multicenter portability study. , 2000, Annals of clinical and laboratory science.

[36]  N. Robert,et al.  Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  A. Gown,et al.  Specificity of HercepTest in determining HER-2/neu status of breast cancers using the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring system. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  S J Schnitt,et al.  Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of HER-2/neu in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  D. Treré,et al.  c‐erbB‐2 over‐expression in amplified and non‐amplified breast carcinoma samples , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[40]  C. Bartoli,et al.  c-erbB2/neu gene and chromosome 17 analysis in breast cancer by FISH on archival cytological fine-needle aspirates , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[41]  P. Maxwell,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridisation detection of erbB2 amplification in breast cancer fine needle aspirates. , 1999, Molecular pathology : MP.

[42]  J. Ingle,et al.  Increased HER2 with U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved antibody. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  J. Ross,et al.  The HER‐2/neu Oncogene in Breast Cancer: Prognostic Factor, Predictive Factor, and Target for Therapy , 1998, The oncologist.

[44]  D A Berry,et al.  erbB-2, p53, and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[45]  F. Révillion,et al.  ERBB2 oncogene in human breast cancer and its clinical significance. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[46]  R. Cote,et al.  Antigen retrieval immunohistochemistry under the influence of pH using monoclonal antibodies. , 1995, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[47]  N. Hynes,et al.  The biology of erbB-2/neu/HER-2 and its role in cancer. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[48]  E. Kay,et al.  C-erbB-2 immunostaining: problems with interpretation. , 1994, Journal of clinical pathology.

[49]  D. Slamon,et al.  Sensitivity of HER-2/neu antibodies in archival tissue samples: potential source of error in immunohistochemical studies of oncogene expression. , 1994, Cancer research.

[50]  P. Sismondi,et al.  Prognostic and predictive relevance of c-erbB-2 and ras expression in node positive and negative breast cancer. , 1994, Anticancer research.

[51]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Optimization of immunohistochemical detection of ERBB2 in human breast cancer: Impact of fixation , 1994, The Journal of pathology.

[52]  W Godolphin,et al.  Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. , 1989, Science.

[53]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.