Mhbounds - Sensitivity Analysis for Average Treatment Effects

Matching has become a popular approach to estimate average treatment effects. It is based on the conditional independence or unconfoundedness assumption. Checking the sensitivity of the estimated results with respect to deviations from this identifying assumption has become an increasingly important topic in the applied evaluation literature. If there are unobserved variables which affect assignment into treatment and the outcome variable simultaneously, a hidden bias might arise to which matching estimators are not robust. We address this problem with the bounding approach proposed by Rosenbaum (2002), where mhbounds allows the researcher to determine how strongly an unmeasured variable must influence the selection process in order to undermine the implications of the matching analysis.

[1]  Tommaso Nannicini,et al.  Simulation-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Matching Estimators , 2006 .

[2]  C. Manski.  Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects , 1989 .

[3]  T. Shakespeare,et al.  Observational Studies , 2003 .

[4]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[5]  B. Sianesi,et al.  PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing , 2003 .

[6]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  A. Aakvik,et al.  Bounding a Matching Estimator: The Case of a Norwegian Training Program , 2001 .

[8]  Jeffrey A. Smith,et al.  Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators? , 2000 .

[9]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[10]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores , 2002 .

[11]  G. Imbens,et al.  Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata , 2004 .

[12]  T. DiPrete,et al.  7. Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects: Rosenbaum Bounds on Matching Estimators and Instrumental Variables Estimation with Imperfect Instruments , 2004 .

[13]  Marco Caliendo,et al.  Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data , 1998 .

[15]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. , 1996 .

[16]  Stephan L. Thomsen,et al.  Sectoral Heterogeneity in the Employment Effects of Job Creation Schemes in Germany , 2006 .

[17]  A. Ichino,et al.  From Temporary Help Jobs to Permanent Employment: What Can We Learn from Matching Estimators and Their Sensitivity? , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.