A concept for miniaturized 3‐D cell culture using an extracellular matrix gel

This paper presents a novel method to embed, anchor, and cultivate cells in a controlled 3‐D flow‐through microenvironment. This is realized using an etched silicon pillar flow chamber filled with extracellular matrix (ECM) gel mixed with cells. At 4°C, while in liquid form, ECM gel is mixed with cells and injected into the chamber. Raising the temperature to 37°C results in a gel, with cells embedded. The silicon pillars both stabilize and increase the surface to volume ratio of the gel. During polymerization the gel shrinks, thus creating channels, which enables perfusion through the chip. The pillars increase the mechanical stability of the gel permitting high surface flow rates without surface modifications. Within the structure cells were still viable and proliferating after 6 days of cultivation. Our method thus makes it possible to perform medium‐ to long‐term cultivation of cells in a controlled 3‐D environment. This concept opens possibilities to perform studies of cells in a more physiological environment compared to traditional 2‐D cultures on flat substrates.

[1]  J. Adams Cell-matrix contact structures , 2001, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[2]  R. Hynes Cell adhesion: old and new questions , 1999 .

[3]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Layer-by-layer microfluidics for biomimetic three-dimensional structures. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[4]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[5]  R. Hynes,et al.  Contact and adhesive specificities in the associations, migrations, and targeting of cells and axons , 1992, Cell.

[6]  C. Larabell,et al.  Reversion of the Malignant Phenotype of Human Breast Cells in Three-Dimensional Culture and In Vivo by Integrin Blocking Antibodies , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  M. Rothkegel,et al.  The molecular architecture of focal adhesions. , 1995, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[8]  H. Gruber,et al.  Human disc cells in monolayer vs 3D culture: cell shape, division and matrix formation , 2000, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[9]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[10]  T. Holmes,et al.  Novel peptide-based biomaterial scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  T. Desai,et al.  Microfluidic Patterning of Cellular Biopolymer Matrices for Biomimetic 3-D Structures , 2003 .

[12]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Microfluidic patterning of cells in extracellular matrix biopolymers: effects of channel size, cell type, and matrix composition on pattern integrity. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[13]  E. Raines,et al.  The extracellular matrix can regulate vascular cell migration, proliferation, and survival: relationships to vascular disease , 2000, International journal of experimental pathology.

[14]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions: a nexus for intracellular signaling and cytoskeletal dynamics. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[15]  A. Abbott Cell culture: Biology's new dimension , 2003, Nature.

[16]  Helene Andersson,et al.  Microfabrication and microfluidics for tissue engineering: state of the art and future opportunities. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[17]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.