Contextual constraint and preview time modulate the semantic preview effect: Evidence from Chinese sentence reading

Word recognition in sentence reading is influenced by information from both preview and context. Recently, semantic preview effect (SPE) was observed being modulated by the constraint of context, indicating that context might accelerate the processing of semantically related preview words. Besides, SPE was found to depend on preview time, which suggests that SPE may change with different processing stages of preview words. Therefore, it raises the question of whether preview time-dependent SPE would be modulated by contextual constraint. In this study, we not only investigated the impact of contextual constraint on SPE in Chinese reading but also examined its dependency on preview time. The preview word and the target word were identical, semantically related or unrelated to the target word. The results showed a significant three-way interaction: The SPE depended on contextual constraint and preview time. In separate analyses for low and high contextual constraint of target words, the SPE significantly decreased with an increase in preview duration when the target word was of low constraint in the sentence. The effect was numerically in the same direction but weaker and statistically nonsignificant when the target word was highly constrained in the sentence. The results indicate that word processing in sentences is a dynamic process of integrating information from both preview (bottom-up) and context (top-down).

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Jochen Laubrock,et al.  Parafoveal processing in silent and oral reading: Reading mode influences the relative weighting of phonological and semantic information in Chinese. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  W. Sommer,et al.  Parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Semantic preview benefit during reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[8]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Ming Yan,et al.  Visually complex foveal words increase the amount of parafoveal information acquired , 2015, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Plausibility effects when reading one- and two-character words in Chinese: evidence from eye movements. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal processing in reading , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[13]  Ming Yan,et al.  Preview fixation duration modulates identical and semantic preview benefit in Chinese reading , 2012 .

[14]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Florian Hutzler,et al.  On the Development of Parafoveal Preprocessing: Evidence from the Incremental Boundary Paradigm , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[16]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Ralph Radach,et al.  Eye movements and parafoveal processing during reading in Korean , 2012 .

[18]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading , 2012, Reading and writing.

[19]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects , 2014 .

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[24]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility? , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Ming Yan,et al.  How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.