Attention Reorients Periodically

Reorienting of voluntary attention enables the processing of stimuli at previously unattended locations. Although studies have identified a ventral fronto-parietal network underlying attention [1, 2], little is known about whether and how early visual areas are involved in involuntary [3, 4] and even less in voluntary [5] reorienting, and their temporal dynamics are unknown. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipital cortex to interfere with attentional reorienting and study its role and temporal dynamics in this process. Human observers performed an orientation discrimination task, with either valid or invalid attention cueing, across a range of stimulus contrasts. Valid cueing induced a behavioral response gain increase, higher asymptotic performance for attended than unattended locations. During subsequent TMS sessions, observers performed the same task, with high stimulus contrast. Based on phosphene mapping, TMS double pulses were applied at one of various delays to a consistent brain location in retinotopic areas (V1/V2), corresponding to the evoked signal of the target or distractor, in a valid or invalid trial. Thus, the stimulation was identical for the four experimental conditions (valid/invalid cue condition × target/distractor-stimulated). TMS modulation of the target and distractor were both periodic (5 Hz, theta) and out of phase with respect to each other in invalid trials only, when attention had to be disengaged from the distractor and reoriented to the target location. Reorientation of voluntary attention periodically involves V1/V2 at the theta frequency. These results suggest that TMS probes theta phase-reset by attentional reorienting and help link periodic sampling in time and attention reorienting in space.

[1]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Human frontal eye fields and target switching , 2010, Cortex.

[2]  MARISA CARRASCO,et al.  Cortical Magnification Neutralizes the Eccentricity Effect in Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[3]  Huan Luo,et al.  Behavioral Oscillations in Attention: Rhythmic α Pulses Mediated through θ Band , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Sooyoung Chung,et al.  Highly ordered arrangement of single neurons in orientation pinwheels , 2006, Nature.

[5]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Dorsal posterior parietal rTMS affects voluntary orienting of visuospatial attention. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  P. Fries,et al.  Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically , 2012, Current Biology.

[7]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Feedback to V1: a reverse hierarchy in vision , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Rufin van Rullen,et al.  Theta Oscillations Modulate Attentional Search Performance Periodically , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[10]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Occipital Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Has an Activity-Dependent Suppressive Effect , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Frontoparietal Cortex Controls Spatial Attention through Modulation of Anticipatory Alpha Rhythms , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on second-order texture contrast sensitivity. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[14]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2014, Neuromethods.

[15]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Re-evaluating the Role of Tpj in Attentional Control: Contextual Updating? , 2022 .

[16]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[18]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Attentional Feedback to Area V1 during Serial Visual Search , 2011, PloS one.

[19]  M. Carrasco,et al.  A population-coding model of attention’s influence on contrast response: Estimating neural effects from psychophysical data , 2009, Vision Research.

[20]  P. Schyns,et al.  Rhythmic TMS Causes Local Entrainment of Natural Oscillatory Signatures , 2011, Current Biology.

[21]  Alexander T. Sack,et al.  Time- and Task-Dependent Non-Neural Effects of Real and Sham TMS , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals , 1986, Nature.

[23]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  C. Olson,et al.  Low-frequency oscillations arising from competitive interactions between visual stimuli in macaque inferotemporal cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  Attention searches nonuniformly in space and in time , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Causal Frequency-Specific Contributions of Frontal Spatiotemporal Patterns Induced by Non-Invasive Neurostimulation to Human Visual Performance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  When sustained attention impairs perception , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  P. Fries,et al.  Distributed Attention Is Implemented through Theta-Rhythmic Gamma Modulation , 2015, Current Biology.

[31]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[32]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[33]  Y. Saalmann,et al.  Rhythmic Sampling within and between Objects despite Sustained Attention at a Cued Location , 2013, Current Biology.

[34]  S. Poonyachoti,et al.  Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous estrogen on anxiety as measured by elevated T-maze in relation to the serotonergic system , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[35]  C. Miniussi,et al.  The Functional Importance of Rhythmic Activity in the Brain , 2012, Current Biology.

[36]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Cortical systems mediating visual attention to both objects and spatial locations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[38]  Peter T. Tkacik,et al.  Color Schlieren imaging of high-pressure overexpanded planar nozzle flow using a simple, low-cost test apparatus , 2011, J. Vis..

[39]  Sean T. Stevens,et al.  Comparing the time course and efficacy of spatial and feature-based attention , 2007, Vision Research.

[40]  Laura Dugué,et al.  The dynamics of attentional sampling during visual search revealed by Fourier analysis of periodic noise interference. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[41]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[42]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  The timing of the involvement of the frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex in visual search , 2008, Neuroreport.

[43]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The Phase of Ongoing Oscillations Mediates the Causal Relation between Brain Excitation and Visual Perception , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Cheal,et al.  Central and Peripheral Precuing of Forced-Choice Discrimination , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[45]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Are event-related potential components generated by phase resetting of brain oscillations? A critical discussion , 2007, Neuroscience.

[46]  D. Heeger,et al.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Ongoing EEG Phase as a Trial-by-Trial Predictor of Perceptual and Attentional Variability , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[48]  P. Fries Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[49]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[51]  R. VanRullen Visual Attention: A Rhythmic Process? , 2013, Current Biology.

[52]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  New light through old windows: Moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, NeuroImage.

[53]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Rhythmic TMS over Parietal Cortex Links Distinct Brain Frequencies to Global versus Local Visual Processing , 2011, Current Biology.

[54]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Transient Attention Enhances Perceptual Performance and fMRI Response in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[56]  Juan Lupiáñez,et al.  Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[57]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS–fMRI reveals dynamic interhemispheric influences of the right parietal cortex during exogenously cued visuospatial attention , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[58]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The blinking spotlight of attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  J. Bullier,et al.  Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[60]  Juan Lupiáñez,et al.  Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[61]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  Anna C Nobre,et al.  FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.