Ultra-wide frequency response measurement of an optical system with a DC photo-detector.

Precise knowledge of an optical device's frequency response is crucial for it to be useful in most applications. Traditional methods for determining the frequency response of an optical system (e.g. optical cavity or waveguide modulator) usually rely on calibrated broadband photo-detectors or complicated RF mixdown operations. As the bandwidths of these devices continue to increase, there is a growing need for a characterization method that does not have bandwidth limitations, or require a previously calibrated device. We demonstrate a new calibration technique on an optical system (consisting of an optical cavity and a high-speed waveguide modulator) that is free from limitations imposed by detector bandwidth, and does not require a calibrated photo-detector or modulator. We use a low-frequency (DC) photo-detector to monitor the cavity's optical response as a function of modulation frequency, which is also used to determine the modulator's frequency response. Knowledge of the frequency-dependent modulation depth allows us to more precisely determine the cavity's characteristics (free spectral range and linewidth). The precision and repeatability of our technique is demonstrated by measuring the different resonant frequencies of orthogonal polarization cavity modes caused by the presence of a non-linear crystal. Once the modulator has been characterized using this simple method, the frequency response of any passive optical element can be determined to a fine resolution (e.g. kilohertz) over several gigahertz.

[1]  I. Yokota,et al.  Evaluation of 4-Gbit/s optical fiber transmission distance with direct and external modulation , 1988 .

[2]  Yoshichika Miwa,et al.  Parallel generation of quadripartite cluster entanglement in the optical frequency comb. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[3]  Optical Heterodyne Method for Amplitude and Phase Response Measurements for Ultrawideband Electrooptic Modulators , 2007, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[4]  Ray Williamson,et al.  Precise free spectral range measurement of telecom etalons , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[5]  William K. Burns,et al.  Novel electrostatic mechanism in the thermal instability of z‐cut LiNbO3 interferometers , 1986 .

[6]  C. A. Johnsen,et al.  High speed optical modulator for application in instrumentation , 1990 .

[7]  E.L. Wooten,et al.  A review of lithium niobate modulators for fiber-optic communications systems , 2000, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[8]  R. L. Jungerman,et al.  Optical receiver and modulator frequency response measurement with a Nd:YAG ring laser heterodyn technique , 1989 .

[9]  P. Delfyett,et al.  Modified Pound-Drever-Hall scheme for high-precision free spectral range measurement of Fabry-Perot etalon , 2008 .

[10]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  Calibration of displacement sensors up to 300 µm with nanometre accuracy and direct traceability to a primary standard of length , 2000 .

[11]  Observation of a comb of optical squeezing over many gigahertz of bandwidth , 2007, 2008 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2008 Conference on Quantum Electronics and Laser Science.

[12]  P. Manson,et al.  HIGH PRECISION FREE SPECTRAL RANGE MEASUREMENT USING A PHASE MODULATED LASER BEAM , 1999 .

[13]  S Uehara Calibration of optical modulator frequency response with application to signal level control. , 1978, Applied optics.

[14]  M. Aketagawa,et al.  Measurement of a free spectral range of a Fabry–Perot cavity using frequency modulation and null method under off-resonance conditions , 2011 .

[15]  Giulia Ferrini,et al.  Full characterization of a highly multimode entangled state embedded in an optical frequency comb using pulse shaping , 2014, 1401.4867.

[16]  A. J. Merer,et al.  A precise calibration system for high‐resolution visible‐laser spectroscopy , 1989 .

[17]  Steven H. Pepper,et al.  Comparison of fast photodetector response measurements by optical heterodyne and pulse response techniques , 1991 .

[18]  A. Luiten,et al.  A simple technique for accurate and complete characterisation of a Fabry-Perot cavity. , 2009, Optics express.

[19]  Steven K. Korotky,et al.  4Gb/s Transmission Experiment over 117km of Optical Fiber Using a Ti:LiNbO3 External Modulator , 1985 .

[20]  P. Delfyett,et al.  High-precision measurement of free spectral range of etalon , 2006 .

[21]  Olivier Pfister,et al.  Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement of 60 modes of a quantum optical frequency comb. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[22]  John L. Hall,et al.  Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator , 1983 .

[23]  C. Latrasse,et al.  An optical frequency scale in exact multiples of 100 GHz for standardization of multifrequency communications , 1996, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[24]  Wide-band electrooptic intensity modulator frequency response measurement using an optical heterodyne down-conversion technique , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[25]  Ken-ichi Ueda,et al.  Accurate measurement of ultralow loss in a high-finesse Fabry-Perot interferometer using the frequency response functions , 1995 .

[26]  M. Lawrence,et al.  A temperature-dependent dispersion equation for congruently grown lithium niobate , 1984 .

[27]  P. Delfyett,et al.  Free spectral range measurement of a fiberized Fabry-Perot etalon with sub-Hz accuracy. , 2010, Optics express.

[28]  J. Lawall,et al.  Fabry-Perot metrology for displacements up to 50 mm. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.