Reply: Do the 10-Year Mortality Outcomes of RITA-3 Inform Contemporary Clinical Practice?

[1]  S. Pocock,et al.  10-Year Mortality Outcome of a Routine Invasive Strategy Versus a Selective Invasive Strategy in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: The British Heart Foundation RITA-3 Randomized Trial. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  A. Jaffe,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[3]  J. Spertus,et al.  Variation in patients’ perceptions of elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease: cross sectional study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  H. Gray,et al.  Early management of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance , 2010, Heart.

[5]  S. Pocock,et al.  Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Camm,et al.  Early management of unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of NICE guidance , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Á. Avezum,et al.  A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome:estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry , 2004 .