Protocol and quality assurance for carotid imaging in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank: development and assessment

Background Ultrasound imaging is able to quantify carotid arterial wall structure for the assessment of cerebral and cardiovascular disease risks. We describe a protocol and quality assurance process to enable carotid imaging at large scale that has been developed for the UK Biobank Imaging Enhancement Study of 100,000 individuals. Design An imaging protocol was developed to allow measurement of carotid intima-media thickness from the far wall of both common carotid arteries. Six quality assurance criteria were defined and a web-based interface (Intelligent Ultrasound) was developed to facilitate rapid assessment of images against each criterion. Results and conclusions Excellent inter and intra-observer agreements were obtained for image quality evaluations on a test dataset from 100 individuals. The image quality criteria then were applied in the UK Biobank Imaging Enhancement Study. Data from 2560 participants were evaluated. Feedback of results to the imaging team led to improvement in quality assurance, with quality assurance failures falling from 16.2% in the first two-month period examined to 6.4% in the last. Eighty per cent had all carotid intima-media thickness images graded as of acceptable quality, with at least one image acceptable for 98% of participants. Carotid intima-media thickness measures showed expected associations with increasing age and gender. Carotid imaging can be performed consistently, with semi-automated quality assurance of all scans, in a limited timeframe within a large scale multimodality imaging assessment. Routine feedback of quality control metrics to operators can improve the quality of the data collection.

[1]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Characterisation of liver fat in the UK Biobank cohort , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  R. Collins,et al.  Burden of carotid artery atherosclerosis in Chinese adults: Implications for future risk of cardiovascular diseases , 2017, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[3]  P. Matthews,et al.  Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  O. Franco,et al.  Normative values for carotid intima media thickness and its progression: Are they transferrable outside of their cohort of origin? , 2016, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[5]  P. Matthews,et al.  UK Biobank’s cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[6]  P. Elliott,et al.  UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age , 2015, PLoS medicine.

[7]  T. Naqvi,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  M. Henein,et al.  Successful novice's training in obtaining accurate assessment of carotid IMT using an automated ultrasound system. , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[9]  Guangchao Charles Feng,et al.  Factors affecting intercoder reliability: a Monte Carlo experiment , 2013 .

[10]  M. Henein,et al.  Fully automated on‐screen carotid intima‐media thickness measurement: A screening tool for subclinical atherosclerosis , 2013, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[11]  V. Fuster,et al.  Rapid Screening for Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Carotid Ultrasound Examination: The HAPPY (Heart Attack Prevention Program for You) Substudy. , 2013, Global heart.

[12]  P. Matthews,et al.  Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank - rationale, challenges and approaches , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[13]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Mannheim Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaque Consensus (2004–2006–2011) , 2012, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[14]  Enzo Grossi,et al.  Measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and of interadventitia common carotid diameter improve prediction of cardiovascular events: results of the IMPROVE (Carotid Intima Media Thickness [IMT] and IMT-Progression as Predictors of Vascular Events in a High Risk European Population) study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Bots,et al.  Should we indeed measure carotid intima-media thickness for improving prediction of cardiovascular events after IMPROVE? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Stein Harald Johnsen,et al.  Risk Factors for Progression of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Total Plaque Area: A 13-Year Follow-Up Study The Tromsø Study , 2012, Stroke.

[17]  S. Bergmann,et al.  Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Atherosclerosis.

[18]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  Common carotid artery intima-media thickness is as good as carotid intima-media thickness of all carotid artery segments in improving prediction of coronary heart disease risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. , 2012, European heart journal.

[19]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Carotid-wall intima-media thickness and cardiovascular events. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[22]  K. Gwet Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. , 2008, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[23]  Christopher B. Kendall,et al.  Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[24]  A. Feinstein,et al.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.