Generating synthetic laser scanning data of forests by combining forest inventory information, a tree point cloud database and an open-source laser scanning simulator

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) data are routinely used to estimate and map structure-related forest inventory variables. The further development, refinement and evaluation of methods to derive forest inventory variables from ALS data require extensive datasets of forest stand information on an individual tree-level and corresponding ALS data. A cost-efficient method to obtain such datasets is the combination of virtual forest stands with a laser scanning simulator. We present an approach to simulate ALS data of forest stands by combining forest inventory information, a tree point cloud database and the laser scanning simulation framework HELIOS++. ALS data of six 1-ha plots were simulated and compared to real ALS data of these plots. The synthetic 3D representations of the forest stands were composed of real laser scanning point clouds of individual trees that were acquired by an uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV), and, for comparison, simplified tree models with cylindrical stems and spheroidal crowns. The simulated ALS point clouds of the six plots were compared with the real point clouds based on canopy cover, height distribution of returns and several other point cloud metrics. In addition, the performance of biomass models trained using these synthetic data was evaluated. The comparison revealed that, in general, both the real tree models and the simplified tree models can be used to generate synthetic data. The results differed for the different study sites and depending on whether all returns or only first returns were considered. The measure of canopy cover was better represented by the data of the simplified tree models, whereas the height distribution of the returns was – for most of the study sites – better represented by the real tree model data. Training biomass models with metrics derived from the real tree model data led to an overestimation of biomass, while using metrics of the simplified tree model data resulted in an underestimation of biomass. Still, the accuracy of models trained with simulated data was only slightly lower compared to models trained with real ALS data. Our results suggest that the presented approach can be used to generate ALS data that are sufficiently realistic for many applications. The synthetic data may be used to develop new or refine existing ALS-based forest inventory methods, to systematically investigate the relationship between point cloud metrics and forest inventory variables and to analyse how this relationship is affected by laser scanning acquisition settings and field reference data characteristics.

[1]  S. Tuominen,et al.  Comparison of neural networks and k-nearest neighbors methods in forest stand variable estimation using airborne laser data , 2022, ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[2]  B. Höfle,et al.  Individual tree point clouds and tree measurements from multi-platform laser scanning in German forests , 2022, Earth System Science Data.

[3]  Mohammad Sadegh Taskhiri,et al.  Forest Structural Complexity Tool - An Open Source, Fully-Automated Tool for Measuring Forest Point Clouds , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[4]  B. Höfle,et al.  Virtual laser scanning with HELIOS++: A novel take on ray tracing-based simulation of topographic full-waveform 3D laser scanning , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[5]  Bernhard Höfle,et al.  Opaque voxel-based tree models for virtual laser scanning in forestry applications , 2021 .

[6]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Effect of scan angle on ALS metrics and area-based predictions of forest attributes for balsam fir dominated stands , 2021, Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research.

[7]  T. Riutta,et al.  The impact of logging on vertical canopy structure across a gradient of tropical forest degradation intensity in Borneo , 2021, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[8]  T. Kneib,et al.  Predicting Tree Species From 3D Laser Scanning Point Clouds Using Deep Learning , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[9]  Lloyd Windrim,et al.  Detection, Segmentation, and Model Fitting of Individual Tree Stems from Airborne Laser Scanning of Forests Using Deep Learning , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[10]  A. Skidmore,et al.  A voxel matching method for effective leaf area index estimation in temperate deciduous forests from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne LiDAR data , 2020 .

[11]  Daniel McInerney,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of the DART Model for Forest Mensuration with Airborne Laser Scanning , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Jonathan P. Dash,et al.  Comparison of models describing forest inventory attributes using standard and voxel-based lidar predictors across a range of pulse densities , 2019, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[13]  Mathias Disney,et al.  Extracting individual trees from lidar point clouds using treeseg , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[14]  F. Hartig,et al.  Using synthetic data to evaluate the benefits of large field plots for forest biomass estimation with LiDAR , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[15]  Daniel J. Hayes,et al.  The Use of Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks to Interpret LiDAR for Forest Inventory , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[16]  A. Huth,et al.  Linking lidar and forest modeling to assess biomass estimation across scales and disturbance states , 2018 .

[17]  Mait Lang,et al.  Estimation of canopy cover in dense mixed-species forests using airborne lidar data , 2018 .

[18]  David A. Coomes,et al.  An Alternative Approach to Using LiDAR Remote Sensing Data to Predict Stem Diameter Distributions across a Temperate Forest Landscape , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Qin Ma,et al.  Comparison of Canopy Cover Estimations From Airborne LiDAR, Aerial Imagery, and Satellite Imagery , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  Estimation of 3D vegetation density with Terrestrial Laser Scanning data using voxels. A sensitivity analysis of influencing parameters , 2017 .

[21]  Laura S. Kenefic,et al.  Layer Stacking: A Novel Algorithm for Individual Forest Tree Segmentation from LiDAR Point Clouds , 2017 .

[22]  Hamid Hamraz,et al.  Vertical stratification of forest canopy for segmentation of understory trees within small-footprint airborne LiDAR point clouds , 2016, 1701.00169.

[23]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Large-scale estimation of change in aboveground biomass in miombo woodlands using airborne laser scanning and national forest inventory data , 2016 .

[24]  Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry,et al.  Simulation of satellite, airborne and terrestrial LiDAR with DART (II): ALS and TLS multi-pulse acquisitions, photon counting, and solar noise , 2016 .

[25]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Simulation of satellite, airborne and terrestrial LiDAR with DART (I): Waveform simulation with quasi-Monte Carlo ray tracing , 2016 .

[26]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Remote Sensing Technologies for Enhancing Forest Inventories: A Review , 2016 .

[27]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Lessons learned from applying a forest gap model to understand ecosystem and carbon dynamics of complex tropical forests , 2016 .

[28]  E. Næsset,et al.  Indirect and direct estimation of forest biomass change using forest inventory and airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[29]  Rebecca A. Spriggs,et al.  A simple area-based model for predicting airborne LiDAR first returns from stem diameter distributions: an example study in an uneven-aged, mixed temperate forest , 2015 .

[30]  Michael W. Palace,et al.  Estimating forest structure in a tropical forest using field measurements, a synthetic model and discrete return lidar data , 2015 .

[31]  Lauri Mehtätalo,et al.  Modeling height-diameter curves for prediction , 2015 .

[32]  Gérard Dedieu,et al.  Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART 5) for Modeling Airborne and Satellite Spectroradiometer and LIDAR Acquisitions of Natural and Urban Landscapes , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Sylvie Durrieu,et al.  PTrees: A point-based approach to forest tree extraction from lidar data , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[34]  Florian Hartig,et al.  Importance of sample size, data type and prediction method for remote sensing-based estimations of aboveground forest biomass , 2014 .

[35]  J. Hagar,et al.  Modeling marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) habitat using LiDAR‐derived canopy data , 2014 .

[36]  A. Huth,et al.  Of climate and its resulting tree growth: Simulating the productivity of temperate forests , 2014 .

[37]  Joanne C. White,et al.  A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach , 2013 .

[38]  S. Hensley,et al.  A study of forest biomass estimates from lidar in the northern temperate forests of New England , 2013 .

[39]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Inference for lidar-assisted estimation of forest growing stock volume , 2013 .

[40]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review , 2012 .

[41]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Using multi-frequency radar and discrete-return LiDAR measurements to estimate above-ground biomass and biomass components in a coastal temperate forest , 2012 .

[42]  Göran Ståhl,et al.  Model-assisted regional forest biomass estimation using LiDAR and InSAR as auxiliary data: A case study from a boreal forest area , 2011 .

[43]  Neal A. Scott,et al.  Characterizing Forest Succession in Central Ontario using Lidar-derived Indices , 2011 .

[44]  K. O. Niemann,et al.  Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass , 2011 .

[45]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Simulating the impact of discrete-return lidar system and survey characteristics over young conifer and broadleaf forests , 2010 .

[46]  B. Koetz,et al.  Discrimination of vegetation strata in a multi-layered Mediterranean forest ecosystem using height and intensity information derived from airborne laser scanning , 2010 .

[47]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data , 2010 .

[48]  A. Hudak,et al.  A cross-comparison of field, spectral, and lidar estimates of forest canopy cover , 2009 .

[49]  E. Næsset,et al.  Classifying species of individual trees by intensity and structure features derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2009 .

[50]  K. Bollmann,et al.  Habitat assessment for forest dwelling species using LiDAR remote sensing: Capercaillie in the Alps , 2009 .

[51]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Testing LiDAR models of fractional cover across multiple forest ecozones , 2009 .

[52]  S. Popescu,et al.  A voxel-based lidar method for estimating crown base height for deciduous and pine trees , 2008 .

[53]  Stephan Getzin,et al.  Asymmetric tree growth at the stand level: Random crown patterns and the response to slope , 2007 .

[54]  Christian Messier,et al.  Overstory influences on light attenuation patterns and understory plant community diversity and composition in southern boreal forests of Quebec , 2006 .

[55]  K. Itten,et al.  LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management , 2004 .

[56]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions , 2004 .

[57]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  Crown-Diameter Prediction Models for 87 Species of Stand-Grown Trees in the Eastern United States , 2003 .

[58]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure , 2003 .

[59]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[60]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[61]  R. Nelson Modeling forest canopy heights: The effects of canopy shape , 1997 .

[62]  R. G. Oderwald,et al.  Separating the ground and airborne laser sampling phases to estimate tropical forest basal area, volume, and biomass , 1997 .

[63]  J. Zavitkovski,et al.  Ground Vegetation Biomass, Production, and Efficiency of Energy Utilization in Some Northern Wisconsin Forest Ecosystems , 1976 .

[64]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Detection of individual trees in UAV LiDAR point clouds using a deep learning framework based on multi-channel representation , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[65]  George Vosselman,et al.  Silvi-Net - A dual-CNN approach for combined classification of tree species and standing dead trees from remote sensing data , 2021, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[66]  V. Walter,et al.  Remembering Both the Machine and the Crowd When Sampling Points: Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation of ALS Point Clouds , 2020, ICPR Workshops.

[67]  Aaron N. Johnston,et al.  High‐resolution habitat modeling with airborne LiDAR for red tree voles , 2017 .

[68]  R. Fournier,et al.  Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data , 2015 .

[69]  Andrew G. Birt,et al.  Computer-based synthetic data to assess the tree delineation algorithm from airborne LiDAR survey , 2011, GeoInformatica.

[70]  Tomas Brandtberg Classifying individual tree species under leaf-off and leaf-on conditions using airborne lidar , 2007 .

[71]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[72]  L. Breiman Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[73]  B. Koch,et al.  TREESVIS-A SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR SIMULTANEOUS 3 D-REAL-TIME VISUALISATION OF DTM , DSM , LASER RAW DATA , MULTISPECTRAL DATA , SIMPLE TREE AND BUILDING MODELS , 2004 .

[74]  H. Pretzscha,et al.  The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA : construction , application and evaluation , 2002 .

[75]  P. Treitz,et al.  Remote Sensing Leaf Area Index (lai) Estimation in Boreal Mixedwood Forest of Ontario, Canada Using Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) and Worldview-2 Imagery , 2022 .