Effects of cell-based angiogenic gene therapy at 6 months: persistent angiogenesis and absence of oncogenicity.

BACKGROUND Transplantation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-transfected cells into myocardial scar enhances angiogenesis and may support the transplanted cells. We evaluated the effect of cell type, time, and location on the durability of this angiogenesis and potential oncogenicity. METHODS Lewis rats underwent myocardial cryoinjury 3 weeks before transplantation with heart cells (HC [a mixed culture of cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts]), VEGF-transfected heart cells (HC+), skeletal myoblasts (Sk), VEGF-transfected skeletal myoblasts (Sk+), or medium (control) (n = 3 per group x 5 groups x 5 timepoints). Three days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 months after transplantation, hearts were excised and the scar, border zone, and normal myocardium evaluated for angioma or sarcoma formation, and vascular density quantitated. RESULTS Vascular densities were lowest in controls, intermediate in HC and Sk (p < 0.05) and highest in HC+ and Sk+ (p < 0.05). Densities were highest in the border zone, intermediate in normal myocardium, and lowest in the scar (p < 0.05), peaking in the border zone of HC+ and Sk+ hearts at 4 weeks. At 6 months, densities were greater in HC and Sk than controls (p < 0.05), and higher in Sk+ than Sk (p < 0.05), but HC+ and HC were similar. There was no evidence of angioma or sarcoma formation at any timepoint. CONCLUSIONS Angiogenesis induced by HC and Sk transplantation lasts at least 6 months and is increased by transfection with VEGF without apparent oncogenicity. The durability of the VEGF effect on vascular densities may be greater with Sk.

[1]  R. Weisel,et al.  Enhanced Myocardial Angiogenesis by Gene Transfer With Transplanted Cells , 2001, Circulation.

[2]  M. Post,et al.  Angiogenesis gene therapy: phase I assessment of direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing VEGF121 cDNA to individuals with clinically significant severe coronary artery disease. , 1999, Circulation.

[3]  R. Weisel,et al.  Beneficial effect of autologous cell transplantation on infarcted heart function: comparison between bone marrow stromal cells and heart cells. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  R. Weisel,et al.  Maximizing Ventricular Function With Multimodal Cell-Based Gene Therapy , 2005, Circulation.

[5]  R. Weisel,et al.  Heart Cell Transplantation Improves Heart Function in Dilated Cardiomyopathic Hamsters , 2000, Circulation.

[6]  R. Weisel,et al.  Angiogenesis by endothelial cell transplantation. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  R. Weisel,et al.  Enhanced IGF-1 expression improves smooth muscle cell engraftment after cell transplantation. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[8]  R. Weisel,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor upregulation in response to cell-based angiogenic gene therapy. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  R. Weisel,et al.  Autologous porcine heart cell transplantation improved heart function after a myocardial infarction. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  C. Murry,et al.  Skeletal muscle meets cardiac muscle. Friends or foes? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  R. C. Chiu,et al.  Myocardial regeneration with satellite cell implantation. , 1994, Transplantation proceedings.

[12]  P. Kligfield,et al.  Six-month assessment of a phase I trial of angiogenic gene therapy for the treatment of coronary artery disease using direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing the VEGF121 cDNA. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[13]  B. Strauss,et al.  Matrix remodeling in experimental and human heart failure: a possible regulatory role for TIMP-3. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[14]  R. Weisel,et al.  Increasing transplanted cell survival with cell-based angiogenic gene therapy. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  A. Hagège,et al.  Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for severe postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  S. Soker,et al.  Overexpression of VEGF 121 in immortalized endothelial cells causes conversion to slowly growing angiosarcoma and high level expression of the VEGF receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 in vivo. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[17]  L. Ye,et al.  Angiomyogenesis for cardiac repair using human myoblasts as carriers of human vascular endothelial growth factor , 2004, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[18]  J. Ware,et al.  Long-term effects of surgical angiogenic therapy with fibroblast growth factor 2 protein. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  T. Partridge,et al.  Culturing satellite cells from living single muscle fiber explants , 1995, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[20]  Y. Kaneda,et al.  Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor–Expressing Skeletal Myoblasts , 2001, Circulation.

[21]  H. Blau,et al.  VEGF gene delivery to myocardium: deleterious effects of unregulated expression. , 2000, Circulation.

[22]  J. Pearlman,et al.  Local perivascular delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: results of a phase I randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 1999, Circulation.

[23]  R. Weisel,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor transgene expression in cell-transplanted hearts. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  D. Smith,et al.  Myoblast transplantation in the porcine model: a potential technique for myocardial repair. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  R. Weisel,et al.  Cardiomyocyte transplantation improves heart function. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.