Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production

Abstract This study focuses on the quantification of pesticide use efficiency for producers of transgenic cotton versus conventional cotton in order to test for the improvement promised by the genetically engineered crop. The environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use is assessed by means of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the external effects of pesticide are quantified by means of the pesticide leaching potential. To account for the fact that conditions other than the ‘treatment” (seed type) are not equal in farm surveys the study employs a second step Tobit regression. The data are from a survey of cotton growers in North Carolina, USA. Differences in environmental efficiency are found to be significant between herbicide tolerant and stacked gene (herbicide tolerant and insect resistant) cotton and between stacked gene and conventional cotton. In contrast, no statistically significant differences are found for efficiency of pest control cost. In the follow-up Tobit regression, differences in production environment and in farm, farmer and field characteristics are accounted for so that the contribution of seed type to efficiency can be observed. The regression results confirm the importance of stacked gene cotton for improving the environmental efficiency of pesticide use in cotton. In contrast, seed type was not significant in explaining differences in cost efficiency among North Carolina cotton growers. The new technology reduces pesticide application but these benefits are curbed by the high price of cotton seed (technology fee).

[1]  Iain Fraser,et al.  An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia , 1999 .

[2]  Matin Qaim,et al.  Bt Cotton in India: Field Trial Results and Economic Projections , 2003 .

[3]  F. Vega-Redondo.  Complex Social Networks: Econometric Society Monographs , 2007 .

[4]  L. Tauer,et al.  SUCCESS IN MAXIMIZING PROFITS AND REASONS FOR PROFIT DEVIATION ON DAIRY FARMS , 1997 .

[5]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  W. Mendenhall,et al.  A Second Course in Statistics: Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Manuel Rapún,et al.  Assessing the technical efficiency of horticultural production in Navarra, Spain , 2003 .

[8]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[9]  P. Struik,et al.  Measuring agricultural sustainability in terms of efficiency: the case of Dutch sugar beet growers. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  G. Rausser.  Active Learning, Control Theory, and Agricultural Policy , 1978 .

[11]  J. Carroll,et al.  Bollgard Cotton: An Assessment of Global Economic, Environmental, and Social Benefits , 2001 .

[12]  J. Gillespie,et al.  Factors Affecting Production Efficiency in a New Alternative Enterprise: The Case of the Ratite Industry , 1997, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[13]  J. Yee,et al.  Cotton Pest Management Strategies and Related Pesticide Use and Yield , 1999 .

[14]  Fangbin Qiao,et al.  Transgenic Varieties and Productivity of Smallholder Cotton Farmers in China , 2002 .

[15]  Loren W. Tauer,et al.  Short-Run and Long-Run Efficiencies of New York Dairy Farms , 1993, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[16]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[17]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[18]  A. M. Stewart,et al.  The Influence of Defoliation Timing on Yields and Quality of Two Cotton Cultivars , 2004 .

[19]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[20]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Richard Bennett,et al.  Farm-Level Economic Impact of Biotechnology: Smallholder Bt Cotton Farmers in South Africa , 2002 .

[22]  Jorge Fernandez-Cornejo,et al.  Farm-Level Effects of Adopting Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans in the U.S.A. , 2002, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[23]  J. Fernandez-Cornejo,et al.  Adoption of Bioengineered Crops , 2005 .

[24]  William W. Lin,et al.  ESTIMATING FARM-LEVEL EFFECTS OF ADOPTING BIOTECHNOLOGY , 2001 .

[25]  David S. Bullock,et al.  Simulating a relative environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant soybeans , 2003 .

[26]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  A Second Course in Statistics: Regression Analysis, 6th Ed. , 2003 .