Highly Tolerated Amino Acid Substitutions Increase the Fidelity of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase I*

Fidelity of DNA synthesis, catalyzed by DNA polymerases, is critical for the maintenance of the integrity of the genome. Mutant polymerases with elevated accuracy (antimutators) have been observed, but these mainly involve increased exonuclease proofreading or large decreases in polymerase activity. We have determined the tolerance of DNA polymerase for amino acid substitutions in the active site and in different segments of E. coli DNA polymerase I and have determined the effects of these substitutions on the fidelity of DNA synthesis. We established a DNA polymerase I mutant library, with random substitutions throughout the polymerase domain. This random library was first selected for activity. The essentiality of DNA polymerases and their sequence and structural conservation suggests that few amino acid substitutions would be tolerated. However, we report that two-thirds of single base substitutions were tolerated without loss of activity, and plasticity often occurs at evolutionarily conserved regions. We screened 408 members of the active library for alterations in fidelity of DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli expressing the mutant polymerases and carrying a second plasmid containing a β-lactamase reporter. Mutation frequencies varied from 1/1000- to 1000-fold greater compared with wild type. Mutations that produced an antimutator phenotype were distributed throughout the polymerase domain, with 12% clustered in the M-helix. We confirmed that a single mutation in this segment results in increased base discrimination. Thus, this work identifies the M-helix as a determinant of fidelity and suggests that polymerases can tolerate many substitutions that alter fidelity without incurring major changes in activity.

[1]  M. Bessman,et al.  Studeis on the biochemical basis of mutation. IV. Effect of amino acid substitution on the enzymatic and biological properties of bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  E. Koonin,et al.  Eukaryotic DNA Polymerases: Proposal for a Revised Nomenclature* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  R. Wood,et al.  POLN, a Nuclear PolA Family DNA Polymerase Homologous to the DNA Cross-link Sensitivity Protein Mus308* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  T. Kunkel,et al.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  C Cruz,et al.  Genetic studies of the lac repressor. XIV. Analysis of 4000 altered Escherichia coli lac repressors reveals essential and non-essential residues, as well as "spacers" which do not require a specific sequence. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  L. Loeb,et al.  A Single Highly Mutable Catalytic Site Amino Acid Is Critical for DNA Polymerase Fidelity* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Thomas E. Ferrin,et al.  Designed divergent evolution of enzyme function , 2006, Nature.

[8]  Jeffrey H. Miller,et al.  Direct Selection for Mutators inEscherichia coli , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  M. Goodman,et al.  Comparison of nucleotide interactions in water, proteins, and vacuum: model for DNA polymerase fidelity. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Samuel H. Wilson,et al.  Structural insights into the origins of DNA polymerase fidelity. , 2003, Structure.

[11]  L. Loeb,et al.  Prokaryotic DNA polymerase I: evolution, structure, and "base flipping" mechanism for nucleotide selection. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  G. Maga,et al.  Eukaryotic DNA polymerases. , 2002, Annual review of biochemistry.

[13]  L. Loeb,et al.  Mutability of DNA polymerase I: implications for the creation of mutant DNA polymerases. , 2005, DNA Repair.

[14]  S. Benkovic,et al.  Mechanism of DNA replication fidelity for three mutants of DNA polymerase I: Klenow fragment KF(exo+), KF(polA5), and KF(exo-). , 1991, Biochemistry.

[15]  L. Loeb,et al.  Thermus aquaticus DNA Polymerase I Mutants with Altered Fidelity , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  J. Hopfield Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  L. Loeb,et al.  In vitro production and screening of DNA polymerase eta mutants for catalytic diversity. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[18]  L. Loeb,et al.  In vivo mutagenesis by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. Ile(709) in motif A functions in base selection. , 2001, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Base Miscoding and Strand Misalignment Errors by Mutator Klenow Polymerases with Amino Acid Substitutions at Tyrosine 766 in the O Helix of the Fingers Subdomain* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  T. Steitz,et al.  Structure of DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment bound to duplex DNA , 1993, Science.

[21]  C. Richardson,et al.  A single residue in DNA polymerases of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I family is critical for distinguishing between deoxy- and dideoxyribonucleotides. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Goldsby,et al.  Defective DNA polymerase-δ proofreading causes cancer susceptibility in mice , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[23]  I. Lehman,et al.  Enzymic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. , 1956, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[24]  P Argos,et al.  An attempt to unify the structure of polymerases. , 1990, Protein engineering.

[25]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Fidelity of mammalian DNA replication and replicative DNA polymerases. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[26]  S. Benkovic,et al.  DNA polymerase fidelity: kinetics, structure, and checkpoints , 2004 .

[27]  K. Loeb,et al.  Multiple mutations and cancer , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. Essigmann,et al.  Probing the active site tightness of DNA polymerase in subangstrom increments. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Sean J. Johnson,et al.  Processive DNA synthesis observed in a polymerase crystal suggests a mechanism for the prevention of frameshift mutations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Switching from high-fidelity replicases to low-fidelity lesion-bypass polymerases. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[31]  J. Ito,et al.  Compilation, alignment, and phylogenetic relationships of DNA polymerases. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  L. Loeb,et al.  The Conserved Active Site Motif A of Escherichia coliDNA Polymerase I Is Highly Mutable* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  P. Green,et al.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. , 1998, Genome research.

[34]  N. Muzyczka,et al.  Studies on the biochemical basis of spontaneous mutation. I. A comparison of the deoxyribonucleic acid polymerases of mutator, antimutator, and wild type strains of bacteriophage T4. , 1972, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[35]  P. Vojta,et al.  Cloning and chromosomal mapping of the human DNA polymerase theta (POLQ), the eighth human DNA polymerase. , 1999, Genomics.

[36]  Chikahide Masutani,et al.  Low fidelity DNA synthesis by human DNA polymerase-η , 2000, Nature.

[37]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Analyzing fidelity of DNA polymerases. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[38]  R. Schaaper,et al.  Mutants of Escherichia coli with increased fidelity of DNA replication. , 1993, Genetics.

[39]  Juno Choe,et al.  Protein tolerance to random amino acid change. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  C. M. Joyce,et al.  Interaction of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) with the single-stranded template beyond the site of synthesis. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[41]  F. Gillin,et al.  Control of mutation frequency by bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. II. Accuracy of nucleotide selection by the L88 mutator, CB120 antimutator, and wild type phage T4 DNA polymerases. , 1976, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  A. Marx,et al.  Enhanced fidelity in mismatch extension by DNA polymerase through directed combinatorial enzyme design. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[43]  P H Patel,et al.  DNA polymerase active site is highly mutable: evolutionary consequences. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[45]  M. Modak,et al.  Presence of 18-Å Long Hydrogen Bond Track in the Active Site of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase I (Klenow Fragment) , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  V. Roegner-Maniscalco,et al.  Overproduction of DnaE protein (alpha subunit of DNA polymerase III) restores viability in a conditionally inviable Escherichia coli strain deficient in DNA polymerase I , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[47]  B. Snel,et al.  Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life , 2006, Science.

[48]  S. Doublié,et al.  Crystal structure of a bacteriophage T7 DNA replication complex at 2.2 Å resolution , 1998, Nature.

[49]  Manel Camps,et al.  Targeted gene evolution in Escherichia coli using a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  T. D. Pugh,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA Mutations, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis in Mammalian Aging , 2005, Science.

[51]  J. Strathern,et al.  Error-prone DNA polymerases: when making a mistake is the only way to get ahead. , 2003, Annual review of genetics.

[52]  T. Kunkel,et al.  Side Chains That Influence Fidelity at the Polymerase Active Site of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase I (Klenow Fragment)* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  T. Steitz,et al.  Genetic and crystallographic studies of the 3',5'-exonucleolytic site of DNA polymerase I. , 1988, Science.

[54]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Network of dynamically important residues in the open/closed transition in polymerases is strongly conserved. , 2005, Structure.

[55]  T. Kunkel,et al.  DNA replication fidelity. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[56]  S. Benkovic,et al.  A mutant of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) with reduced fidelity. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[57]  Howard T. Jacobs,et al.  Premature ageing in mice expressing defective mitochondrial DNA polymerase , 2004, Nature.

[58]  Gabriel Waksman,et al.  Crystal structures of open and closed forms of binary and ternary complexes of the large fragment of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I: structural basis for nucleotide incorporation , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[59]  M. Donlin,et al.  Mutants affecting nucleotide recognition by T7 DNA polymerase. , 1994, Biochemistry.