Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memory-based control of attention

There are two opposing models with regard to the function of memory in visual search: a memorydriven model and a memory-free model. Recently, Horowitz and Wolfe (2001) investigated a multipletarget search task. Participants were required to decide whether or not there were at leastn targets present. They demonstrated that the reaction time ×n function has a positive and accelerated curve. They argued that the memory-free model predicts this curve, whereas the memory-driven model predicts a linear function. In this study, I varied the total set sizes of a multiple-target search task and fitted the models separately for eachn condition. The model fit indicated that the memory-driven model is more appropriate than the memory-free model in eachn condition. These results suggest that an amnesic process does not cause the positive accelerated curve of the reaction time ×n function but that it is the result of the time needed to examine each additionaln item.

[1]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search , 2000, Current Biology.

[2]  H. Müller,et al.  Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: inhibition of return. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual Search Remains Efficient when Visual Working Memory is Full , 2001, Psychological science.

[5]  A. Yagi,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? , 2003 .

[7]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Visual Search has Memory , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[9]  Akihiro Yagi,et al.  Inhibitory Tagging on Randomly Moving Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[10]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[12]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[13]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  In Search of Remembrance: Evidence for Memory in Visual Search , 2000, Psychological science.

[15]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[16]  G. Baylis,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration , 2001, Memory & cognition.