Selecting the Optimal Mine Ventilation System via a Decision Making Framework under Hesitant Linguistic Environment

Ventilation systems are amongst the most essential components of a mine. As the indicators of ventilation systems are in general of ambiguity or uncertainty, the selection of ventilation systems can therefore be regarded as a complex fuzzy decision making problem. In order to solve such problems, a decision making framework based on a new concept, the hesitant linguistic preference relation (HLPR), is constructed. The basic elements in the HLPR are hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers (HFLNs). At first, new operational laws and aggregation operators of HFLNs are defined to overcome the limitations in existing literature. Subsequently, a novel comparison method based on likelihood is proposed to obtain the order relationship of two HFLNs. Then, a likelihood-based consistency index is introduced to represent the difference between two hesitant linguistic preference relations (HLPRs). It is a new way to express the consistency degree for the reason that the traditional consistency indices are almost exclusively based on distance measures. Meanwhile, a consistency-improving model is suggested to attain acceptable consistent HLPRs. In addition, a method to receive reasonable ranking results from HLPRs with acceptable consistency is presented. At last, this method is used to pick out the best mine ventilation system under uncertain linguistic decision conditions. A comparison and a discussion are conducted to demonstrate the validity of the presented approach. The results show that the proposed method is effective for selecting the optimal mine ventilation system, and provides references for the construction and management of mines.

[1]  Donghai Liu,et al.  Distance Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Sets and Their Applications in Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[2]  N. Liu,et al.  Approaches to the selection of cold chain logistics enterprises under hesitant fuzzy environment based on decision distance measures , 2018 .

[3]  Vicenç Torra,et al.  Decomposition theorems and extension principles for hesitant fuzzy sets , 2018, Inf. Fusion.

[4]  Zhang-peng Tian,et al.  A Likelihood-Based Qualitative Flexible Approach with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information , 2016, Cognitive Computation.

[5]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Multicriteria linguistic decision making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and the aggregation of fuzzy sets , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Wei-zhang Liang,et al.  Performance assessment of circular economy for phosphorus chemical firms based on VIKOR-QUALIFLEX method , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[7]  Peide Liu,et al.  Some Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Hesitant Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Bonferroni Mean Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2017 .

[8]  Weizhang Liang,et al.  Selecting the optimal mining method with extended multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA) approach , 2019, Neural Computing and Applications.

[9]  Hao Wu,et al.  Assessing the risk degree of goafs by employing hybrid TODIM method under uncertainty , 2018, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[10]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  Models for selecting an ERP system with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[11]  Euler De Souza Application of ventilation management programs for improved mine safety , 2017 .

[12]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[13]  Bin Zhu,et al.  Studies on Consistency Measure of Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2013, ITQM.

[14]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making using interval-valued hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX methods based on a likelihood-based comparison approach , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[15]  Xibing Li,et al.  Determination of the minimum thickness of crown pillar for safe exploitation of a subsea gold mine based on numerical modelling , 2013 .

[16]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations , 2016 .

[17]  Zeshui Xu Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making , 2005 .

[18]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Granulating linguistic information in decision making under consensus and consistency , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[20]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations: An interval consistency index , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[21]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A model based on subjective linguistic preference relations for group decision making problems , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Consistency and Consensus Models with Local Adjustment Strategy for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[23]  Hao Wu,et al.  Evaluating Investment Risks of Metallic Mines Using an Extended TOPSIS Method with Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers , 2017, Symmetry.

[24]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  Selecting Project Delivery Systems Based on Simplified Neutrosophic Linguistic Preference Relations , 2017, Symmetry.

[25]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. Towards high quality progress , 2016, Inf. Fusion.

[26]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[27]  Qingxian An,et al.  GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH MULTIPLICATIVE TRIANGULAR HESITANT FUZZY PREFERENCE RELATIONS AND COOPERATIVE GAMES METHOD , 2017 .

[28]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Soft Sets and Their Applications in Decision Making , 2018, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[29]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  An axiomatic approach to approximation-consistency of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations , 2017, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[30]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Yejun Xu,et al.  A group consensus decision support model for hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations with additive consistency , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[32]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Handling forecasting problems based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[33]  Metin Dağdeviren,et al.  An integrated model using SWOT analysis and Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for evaluation occupational safety risks in life cycle of wind turbine , 2018, Safety Science.

[34]  Fubao Zhou,et al.  Numerical investigation of dust dispersion in a coal roadway with hybrid ventilation system , 2017 .

[35]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group decision making with compatibility measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations , 2019, Soft Comput..

[36]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[37]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Evaluating Students' Answerscripts Using Fuzzy Numbers Associated With Degrees of Confidence , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[38]  Jeng-Shyang Pan,et al.  Forecasting enrollments using automatic clustering techniques and fuzzy logical relationships , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy decision making and fuzzy group decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[40]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[41]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different left heights and right heights , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making problems , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[43]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[44]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Some consistency measures of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[45]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Preference Relations Based on Intuitionistic Multiplicative Information , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[46]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[47]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on the Hausdorff distance of hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers , 2015, Soft Computing.

[48]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Trapezium cloud TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic information , 2017, Granular Computing.

[49]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consistency Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[50]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  On the use of multiplicative consistency in hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[51]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Interactive algorithms for improving incomplete linguistic preference relations based on consistency measures , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[52]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Average-case consistency measurement and analysis of interval-valued reciprocal preference relations , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[53]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy forecasting based on high-order fuzzy logical relationships and automatic clustering techniques , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..