Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications

Species distribution models (SDMs) are used to inform a range of ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications. However, users often underestimate the strong links between data type, model output and suitability for end-use. We synthesize current knowledge and provide a simple framework that summarizes how interactions between data type and the sampling process (i.e. imperfect detection and sampling bias) determine the quantity that is estimated by a SDM. We then draw upon the published literature and simulations to illustrate and evaluate the information needs of the most common ecological, biogeographical and conservation applications of SDM outputs. We find that, while predictions of models fitted to the most commonly available observational data (presence records) suffice for some applications, others require estimates of occurrence probabilities, which are unattainable without reliable absence records. Our literature review and simulations reveal that, while converting continuous SDM outputs into categories of assumed presence or absence is common practice, it is seldom clearly justified by the application's objective and it usually degrades inference. Matching SDMs to the needs of particular applications is critical to avoid poor scientific inference and management outcomes. This paper aims to help modellers and users assess whether their intended SDM outputs are indeed fit for purpose.

[1]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  The spatial links tool: Automated mapping of habitat linkages in variegated landscapes , 2007 .

[2]  A. Jarvis,et al.  The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives , 2008 .

[3]  David I. Warton,et al.  Finite Mixture of Regression Modeling for High-Dimensional Count and Biomass Data in Ecology , 2013 .

[4]  T. Hastie,et al.  Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species , 2014, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[5]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression , 2000 .

[6]  C. E. González‐Orozco,et al.  Distorted perception of the spatial distribution of plant diversity through uneven collecting efforts: the example of Asteraceae in Australia , 2012 .

[7]  Robert M. Dorazio,et al.  Accounting for imperfect detection and survey bias in statistical analysis of presence‐only data , 2014 .

[8]  Miroslav Dudík,et al.  Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation , 2008 .

[9]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Selection, use, choice and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[10]  F. Sangermano,et al.  Evaluation of species distribution model algorithms for fine‐scale container‐breeding mosquito risk prediction , 2011, Medical and veterinary entomology.

[11]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[12]  Luigi Boitani,et al.  Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates in Italy: Priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape , 2006 .

[13]  Elke Schüttler,et al.  Abundance and habitat preferences of the southernmost population of mink: implications for managing a recent island invasion , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[14]  Jane Elith,et al.  Maxent is not a presence–absence method: a comment on Thibaud et al. , 2014 .

[15]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Assisted colonization in a changing climate: a test‐study using two U.K. butterflies , 2009 .

[16]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[17]  T. Hastie,et al.  Finite-Sample Equivalence in Statistical Models for Presence-Only Data. , 2012, The annals of applied statistics.

[18]  Tim Newbold,et al.  Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models , 2010 .

[19]  H. Claessens,et al.  FINE-SCALE HABITAT SELECTION BY TWO SPECIALIST WOODPECKERS OCCURRING IN BEECH AND OAK-DOMINATED FORESTS IN SOUTHERN BELGIUM , 2010 .

[20]  Navinder J. Singh,et al.  Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice , 2013, Oryx.

[21]  Matthew J. Smith,et al.  Protected areas network is not adequate to protect a critically endangered East Africa Chelonian: Modelling distribution of pancake tortoise, Malacochersus tornieri under current and future climates , 2013, bioRxiv.

[22]  Michael D. Cramer,et al.  A physiological analogy of the niche for projecting the potential distribution of plants , 2012 .

[23]  Bruce L. Webber,et al.  Modelling horses for novel climate courses: insights from projecting potential distributions of native and alien Australian acacias with correlative and mechanistic models , 2011 .

[24]  J. Lobo,et al.  Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or presence–absence , 2007 .

[25]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  ESTIMATING AND DEALING WITH DETECTABILITY IN OCCUPANCY SURVEYS FOR FOREST OWLS AND ARBOREAL MARSUPIALS , 2005 .

[26]  Victor C. Mastro,et al.  Incorporating anthropogenic variables into a species distribution model to map gypsy moth risk , 2008 .

[27]  Blas M. Benito,et al.  The impact of modelling choices in the predictive performance of richness maps derived from species‐distribution models: guidelines to build better diversity models , 2013 .

[28]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Utility of Dynamic‐Landscape Metapopulation Models for Sustainable Forest Management , 2005 .

[29]  S. Ferrier,et al.  A probabilistic approach to niche‐based community models for spatial forecasts of assemblage properties and their uncertainties , 2013 .

[30]  K. Wessels,et al.  Vulnerability of South African animal taxa to climate change , 2002 .

[31]  B. De Baets,et al.  Absence reduction in entomological surveillance data to improve niche-based distribution models for Culicoides imicola. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[32]  A. Jarvis,et al.  Use of GIS for Optimizing a Collecting Mission for a Rare Wild Pepper (Capsicum flexuosum Sendtn.) in Paraguay , 2005, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.

[33]  A. Blaschke,et al.  Ecological niche models for the evaluation of management options in an urban floodplain—conservation vs. restoration purposes , 2013 .

[34]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[35]  Debra P. C. Peters,et al.  Spatial Prediction of Invasion Success Across Heterogeneous Landscapes using an Individual-Based Model , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[36]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Streamlining 'search and destroy': cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[37]  Trevor H. Booth,et al.  bioclim: the first species distribution modelling package, its early applications and relevance to most current MaxEnt studies , 2014 .

[38]  W. Courtens,et al.  Modelling pink‐footed goose (Anser brachyrhynchus) wintering distributions for the year 2050: potential effects of land‐use change in Europe , 2008 .

[39]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists , 2011 .

[40]  J. Busby BIOCLIM - a bioclimate analysis and prediction system , 1991 .

[41]  Andreas Wilting,et al.  Modelling the Species Distribution of Flat-Headed Cats (Prionailurus planiceps), an Endangered South-East Asian Small Felid , 2010, PloS one.

[42]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort , 2005 .

[43]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  Species distribution modelling—Effect of design and sample size of pseudo-absence observations , 2011 .

[44]  A. König,et al.  Habitat model for baiting foxes in suburban areas to counteract Echinococcus multilocularis , 2012, Wildlife Research.

[45]  Ascelin Gordon,et al.  Assessing the impacts of biodiversity offset policies , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  J. Cook,et al.  Phylogeography of the western jumping mouse (Zapus princeps) detects deep and persistent allopatry with expansion , 2013 .

[47]  Bryan C. Carstens,et al.  Distribution modelling and statistical phylogeography: an integrative framework for generating and testing alternative biogeographical hypotheses , 2007 .

[48]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Population dynamics can be more important than physiological limits for determining range shifts under climate change , 2013, Global change biology.

[49]  N. Raes,et al.  Using species distribution modeling to improve conservation and land use planning of Yunnan, China , 2012 .

[50]  Q. Guo,et al.  How to assess the prediction accuracy of species presence–absence models without absence data? , 2013 .

[51]  J. Lobo,et al.  Deriving the Species Richness Distribution of Geotrupinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) in Mexico from the Overlap of Individual Model Predictions , 2010, Environmental entomology.

[52]  C. Muhlfeld,et al.  ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF RIVER REGULATION ON NATIVE BULL TROUT (SALVELINUS CONFLUENTUS) AND WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT (ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKII LEWISI) HABITATS IN THE UPPER FLATHEAD RIVER, MONTANA, USA , 2012 .

[53]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  Avoiding Pitfalls of Using Species Distribution Models in Conservation Planning , 2003 .

[54]  José J. Lahoz-Monfort,et al.  Ignoring Imperfect Detection in Biological Surveys Is Dangerous: A Response to ‘Fitting and Interpreting Occupancy Models' , 2014, PloS one.

[55]  D. Warton,et al.  Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson Point Process Models for Species Distribution Modeling in Ecology , 2013, Biometrics.

[56]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Presence‐only modelling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences? , 2013 .

[57]  G. Guillera‐Arroita,et al.  Species Occupancy Modeling for Detection Data Collected Along a Transect , 2011 .

[58]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Cost-effective priorities for global mammal conservation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  G. C. Costa,et al.  The importance of biotic interactions in species distribution models: a test of the Eltonian noise hypothesis using parrots , 2014 .

[60]  M. Kéry,et al.  Predicting species distributions from checklist data using site‐occupancy models , 2010 .

[61]  R. Pearson,et al.  Applications of ecological niche modeling for species delimitation: a review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[62]  M. Abdel-Dayem,et al.  The Potential Distribution of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Libya Based on Ecological Niche Model , 2012, Journal of medical entomology.

[63]  J. Lobo,et al.  How well does presence‐only‐based species distribution modelling predict assemblage diversity? A case study of the Tenerife flora , 2011 .

[64]  Tim Newbold,et al.  Climate‐based models of spatial patterns of species richness in Egypt’s butterfly and mammal fauna , 2009 .

[65]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[66]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions , 2013, Ecology letters.

[67]  Jarno Vanhatalo,et al.  Species distribution modeling with Gaussian processes : A case study with the youngest stages of sea spawning whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L. s.l.) larvae , 2012 .

[68]  Catherine S. Jarnevich,et al.  Challenges of predicting the potential distribution of a slow-spreading invader: a habitat suitability map for an invasive riparian tree , 2010, Biological Invasions.

[69]  J. Calabrese,et al.  Stacking species distribution models and adjusting bias by linking them to macroecological models , 2014 .

[70]  P. Osborne,et al.  Selecting suitable habitats for reintroductions: variation, change and the role of species distribution modelling , 2012 .

[71]  D. Richardson,et al.  A Quantitative Climate-Match Score for Risk-Assessment Screening of Reptile and Amphibian Introductions , 2009, Environmental management.

[72]  J. Franklin,et al.  Evaluation of assisted colonization strategies under global change for a rare, fire‐dependent plant , 2012 .

[73]  Aldina M. A. Franco,et al.  Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  M. White,et al.  Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence‐only data , 2013 .

[75]  H. Henttonen,et al.  High-latitude diversification within Eurasian least shrews and Alaska tiny shrews (Soricidae) , 2010 .

[76]  Lluís Brotons,et al.  Modelling the effects of irrigation schemes on the distribution of steppe birds in Mediterranean farmland , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[77]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[78]  Mathieu Marmion,et al.  Using summed individual species models and state-of-the-art modelling techniques to identify threatened plant species hotspots. , 2009 .

[79]  J. Leathwick,et al.  COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TREE SPECIES IN NEW ZEALAND'S OLD‐GROWTH INDIGENOUS FORESTS , 2001 .

[80]  A. St‐Hilaire,et al.  Assessment of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) habitat quality and its uncertainty using a multiple-expert fuzzy model applied to the Romaine River (Canada) , 2013 .

[81]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[82]  M. Araújo,et al.  Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions , 2010 .

[83]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[84]  Jane Elith,et al.  Predicting distribution changes of a mire ecosystem under future climates , 2014 .

[85]  J. Nichols,et al.  Advances and applications of occupancy models , 2014 .

[86]  Hong S. He,et al.  Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape , 2004 .

[87]  R. Shine,et al.  The cane toad's (Chaunus [Bufo] marinus) increasing ability to invade Australia is revealed by a dynamically updated range model , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[88]  Blas M. Benito,et al.  Forecasting plant range collapse in a mediterranean hotspot: when dispersal uncertainties matter , 2014 .

[89]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Site‐Occupancy Distribution Modeling to Correct Population‐Trend Estimates Derived from Opportunistic Observations , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[90]  S. Richards,et al.  Prevalence, thresholds and the performance of presence–absence models , 2014 .

[91]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Bioclimatic Analysis to Enhance Reintroduction Biology of the Endangered Helmeted Honeyeater (Lichenostomus melanops cassidix) in Southeastern Australia , 1998 .

[92]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter , 2008, Biology Letters.

[93]  M. Silman,et al.  Keep collecting: accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought , 2011 .

[94]  I. Martínez,et al.  Poor effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network protecting Mediterranean lichen species , 2013 .

[95]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection , 1996 .

[96]  Carlos Carroll,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Spatial Models for Multispecies Conservation Planning and Monitoring , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[97]  G. Imbens,et al.  Case-control studies with contaminated controls☆ , 1996 .

[98]  H. Possingham,et al.  Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools , 2009, Environmental Conservation.

[99]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[100]  Laura J. Pollock,et al.  Understanding co‐occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM) , 2014 .

[101]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  When have we looked hard enough? A novel method for setting minimum survey effort protocols for flora surveys , 2008 .

[102]  T. Dawson,et al.  Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions , 2005 .

[103]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  Assessing transferability of ecological models: an underappreciated aspect of statistical validation , 2012 .

[104]  Amy Pocewicz,et al.  A Framework for Implementing Biodiversity Offsets: Selecting Sites and Determining Scale , 2009 .

[105]  S. Andelman,et al.  Protected area needs in a changing climate , 2007 .

[106]  E. Zakharov,et al.  Mitochondrial phylogeography of the Holarctic Parnassius phoebus complex supports a recent refugial model for alpine butterflies , 2012 .

[107]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models , 2008, Biology Letters.

[108]  V. Gonzalez,et al.  Anthidium vigintiduopunctatum Friese (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae): the elusive “dwarf bee” of the Galápagos Archipelago? , 2010, Biological Invasions.

[109]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Projected range shifting by montane mammals under climate change: implications for Cascadia's National Parks , 2012 .

[110]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Likelihood analysis of species occurrence probability from presence‐only data for modelling species distributions , 2012, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[111]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level , 2006 .

[112]  Robert M Dorazio,et al.  Predicting the Geographic Distribution of a Species from Presence‐Only Data Subject to Detection Errors , 2012, Biometrics.

[113]  D. Allainé,et al.  Brown bear habitat suitability in the Pyrenees: transferability across sites and linking scales to make the most of scarce data , 2012 .

[114]  David A. W. Miller,et al.  Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational error occur: non-detection and species misidentification. , 2011, Ecology.

[115]  M. Kéry,et al.  Imperfect detection is the rule rather than the exception in plant distribution studies , 2013 .

[116]  Subhash R Lele,et al.  Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. , 2006, Ecology.

[117]  A. Peterson,et al.  Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models , 2008 .

[118]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Aligning Conservation Priorities Across Taxa in Madagascar with High-Resolution Planning Tools , 2008, Science.

[119]  K. D. Cocks,et al.  Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: An example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia , 1989 .

[120]  D. Nogues‐Bravo,et al.  Applications of species distribution modeling to paleobiology , 2011 .

[121]  T. Burg,et al.  Genetic Signals of Demographic Expansion in Downy Woodpecker (Picoides pubescens) after the Last North American Glacial Maximum , 2012, PloS one.

[122]  Brenna R. Forester,et al.  Integrating ensemble species distribution modelling and statistical phylogeography to inform projections of climate change impacts on species distributions , 2013 .

[123]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions. , 2010, Ecology.

[124]  Jane Elith,et al.  Fauna habitat modelling and mapping: A review and case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW , 2005 .

[125]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Finessing atlas data for species distribution models , 2011 .

[126]  Zachary A. Siders,et al.  Seasonal Variation in the Spatial Distribution of Basking Sharks (Cetorhinus maximus) in the Lower Bay of Fundy, Canada , 2013, PloS one.

[127]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Modeling range shifts for invasive vertebrates in response to climate change , 2013 .

[128]  Luigi Maiorano,et al.  The Use of Climatic Niches in Screening Procedures for Introduced Species to Evaluate Risk of Spread: A Case with the American Eastern Grey Squirrel , 2013, PloS one.

[129]  Avishek Chakraborty,et al.  Point pattern modelling for degraded presence‐only data over large regions , 2011 .

[130]  R. Swihart,et al.  Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models , 2004 .

[131]  W. Keeton,et al.  Stand-Level Forest Structure and Avian Habitat: Scale Dependencies in Predicting Occurrence in a Heterogeneous Forest , 2008 .

[132]  S. Dobrowski,et al.  Evaluating ensemble forecasts of plant species distributions under climate change , 2013 .

[133]  John A. Silander,et al.  A comparison of Maxlike and Maxent for modelling species distributions , 2014 .

[134]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Imperfect detection impacts the performance of species distribution models , 2014 .

[135]  M. Turelli,et al.  Environmental Niche Equivalency versus Conservatism: Quantitative Approaches to Niche Evolution , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[136]  J. Franklin Species distribution models in conservation biogeography: developments and challenges , 2013 .

[137]  D. Alvarado-Serrano,et al.  Exploring the population genetic consequences of the colonization process with spatio‐temporally explicit models: insights from coupled ecological, demographic and genetic models in montane grasshoppers , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[138]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Encyclopedia of Biodiversity , 2000 .

[139]  Paul Beier,et al.  Toward Best Practices for Developing Regional Connectivity Maps , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[140]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. II. Community-level modelling , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[141]  G. Englund,et al.  Future Distribution of Arctic Char Salvelinus alpinus in Sweden under Climate Change: Effects of Temperature, Lake Size and Species Interactions , 2012, AMBIO.

[142]  Monica Papeş,et al.  Modelling ecological niches from low numbers of occurrences: assessment of the conservation status of poorly known viverrids (Mammalia, Carnivora) across two continents , 2007 .

[143]  B. Wintle,et al.  The use of dynamic landscape metapopulation models for forest management: a case study of the red-backed salamander , 2012 .

[144]  K. McFarland,et al.  The relative contribution of local habitat and landscape context to metapopulation processes: a dynamic occupancy modeling approach , 2012 .

[145]  P. Drapeau,et al.  Winter site occupancy patterns of the northern flying squirrel in boreal mixed-wood forests , 2012 .

[146]  J. Elith,et al.  Assessing the impacts of climate change and land transformation on Banksia in the South West Australian Floristic Region , 2010 .

[147]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Dual impacts of climate change: forest migration and turnover through life history , 2014, Global change biology.

[148]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Modelling human impacts on the Tasmanian wedge-tailed eagle (Aquila audax fleayi) , 2009 .

[149]  Jane Elith,et al.  On estimating probability of presence from use-availability or presence-background data. , 2013, Ecology.

[150]  Marc Kéry,et al.  Towards the modelling of true species distributions , 2011 .

[151]  Eduardo Pineda,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[152]  G. Guillera‐Arroita,et al.  Analysing and mapping species range dynamics using occupancy models , 2013 .

[153]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[154]  S. Domisch,et al.  Climate‐change winners and losers: stream macroinvertebrates of a submontane region in Central Europe , 2011 .

[155]  R. Richter,et al.  How to account for habitat suitability in weed management programmes? , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[156]  T. Matsui,et al.  Does future climate change facilitate expansion of evergreen broad-leaved tree species in the human-disturbed landscape of the Korean Peninsula? Implication for monitoring design of the impact assessment , 2014, Journal of Forest Research.

[157]  S. Aitken,et al.  Whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) assisted migration potential: testing establishment north of the species range. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[158]  J. Altringham,et al.  Multiscale, presence-only habitat suitability models: fine-resolution maps for eight bat species , 2013 .

[159]  Martin G. Raphael,et al.  Some mathematical programming approaches for optimizing timber age-class distributions to meet multispecies wildlife population objectives , 1993 .

[160]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[161]  N. Yoccoz Occupancy Estimation and Modeling. Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence , 2006 .

[162]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Using Niche‐Based Models to Improve the Sampling of Rare Species , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[163]  David J. Beerling,et al.  The impact of temperature on the northern distribution limits of the introduced species Fallopia japonica and Impatiens glandulifera in north-west Europe , 1993 .

[164]  H. Possingham,et al.  IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES , 2003 .

[165]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species , 1990 .

[166]  David I. Warton,et al.  Model-Based Control of Observer Bias for the Analysis of Presence-Only Data in Ecology , 2013, PloS one.

[167]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Conservation planning under climate change : Toward accounting for uncertainty in predicted species distributions to increase confidence in conservation investments in space and time , 2011 .

[168]  Cindy E Hauser,et al.  Optimal surveillance strategy for invasive species management when surveys stop after detection , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[169]  José J. Lahoz‐Monfort,et al.  Designing studies to detect differences in species occupancy: power analysis under imperfect detection , 2012 .

[170]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Novel methods for the design and evaluation of marine protected areas in offshore waters , 2008 .

[171]  M. Araújo,et al.  Choice of threshold alters projections of species range shifts under climate change , 2011 .

[172]  C. Beans,et al.  Climate suitability and human influences combined explain the range expansion of an invasive horticultural plant , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[173]  S. Domisch,et al.  Continental-scale conservation prioritization of African dragonflies , 2013 .

[174]  H. Oguma,et al.  Comparison of effects of spatial autocorrelation on distribution predictions of four rare plant species in the Watarase wetland , 2010, Ecological Research.

[175]  A. Peterson,et al.  Geographical potential of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile Mayr) in the face of global climate change , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[176]  Marc Kery,et al.  Inferring the absence of a species -- a case study of snakes , 2002 .

[177]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Inference from presence-only data; the ongoing controversy. , 2013, Ecography.

[178]  Mira Kattwinkel,et al.  Modelling multi-species response to landscape dynamics: mosaic cycles support urban biodiversity , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[179]  D. Warton,et al.  Correction note: Poisson point process models solve the “pseudo-absence problem” for presence-only data in ecology , 2010, 1011.3319.

[180]  M. McCarthy,et al.  LINKING LANDSCAPE DATA WITH POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS: MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR THE HELMETED HONEYEATER Lichenostomus melanops cassidix , 1995 .