Disciplinary and interdisciplinary affiliations of experienced researchers

This article reports on a study of senior academics’ views of their disciplinary and interdisciplinary affiliations. It questions the idea that academics have a firm and fixed disciplinary identity from which they then act and suggests that academic work in the contemporary university challenges and changes how individuals view their disciplinary affiliation. The article provides empirical data that lends weight to critical questioning of anthropological metaphors, which have tended to dominate discussions of disciplinarity. It suggests that contemporary understandings of disciplinary and interdisciplinary identity need more fluid metaphors and models; ones that can capture the shifting and questioning uncertainties that give expression to the rhetorical and reflexive nature of academics’ disciplinary affiliations. The article explores the implications of a dominant emphasis on disciplinary relationships for understanding disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity and examines the practical implications for structures and systems that are designed to enhance and evaluate research and teaching within higher education.

[1]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 1991 .

[2]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[3]  L. Huber.  Disciplinary Cultures and Social Reproduction. , 1990 .

[4]  A. Brew.  Conceptions of Research: A phenomenographic study , 2001 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Quinlan.  Commonalities and controversy in context: a study of academic historians’ educational beliefs , 1999 .

[6]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[7]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[8]  Tony Becher.  Historians on history , 1989 .

[9]  Lisa Lucas,et al.  The Research Game in Academic Life , 2006 .

[10]  Tony Becher,et al.  Physicists on physics , 1990 .

[11]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[12]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[13]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  The Culture of Scientists and Disciplinary Rhetoric , 1990 .

[14]  Angela Brew,et al.  Research and Teaching: Beyond the Divide , 2006 .

[15]  A. Biglan.  The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .

[16]  Sherwyn P. Morreale,et al.  Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 2023 .

[17]  J. Donald.  University Professors' Views of Knowledge and Validation Processes. , 1990 .

[18]  Arabella Lyon.  INTERDISCIPLINARITY: GIVING UP TERRITORY , 1992 .

[19]  Angela Brew,et al.  The nature of research : inquiry in academic contexts , 2001 .

[20]  P. Bourdieu.  The Logic of Practice , 1990 .

[21]  M. Henkel.  Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education , 2000 .

[22]  J. Stoecker.  The Biglan classification revisited , 1993 .

[23]  Family and Consumer Sciences University Faculty Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Work , 2005 .

[24]  Oili-Helena Ylijoki.  Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying – A case-study of four Finnish university departments , 2000 .