Vegetation texture as an approach to community structure: community-level convergence in a New Zealand temperate rainforest

Summary: Functional convergence of different communities in similar environments would be expected as an outcome of the operation of ‘assembly rules’. At an ecological level, competitive exclusion would restrict the co-occurrence of species with similar niches. Repetition of competitive sorting on an evolutionary time scale might lead to character displacement. Either process would ultimately lead to species niches being more regularly arranged in ecological factor space than expected on a random basis, with the consequence that the niche structure of different communities in similar environments would converge. We assessed the applicability of this model of community structure by comparing vegetation between study sites spaced in altitude 20 m apart along a continuous gradient in South Westland low-altitude conifer/ broad-leaved forest, with respect to seven variates of vegetation texture primarily concerning the morphology of the photosynthetic unit (PSU). We employed a null model that assigns observed species to sites at random, as would be expected in the absence of assembly rules for the communities, comparing observed variation in texture to variation under the null model to look for convergence or divergence and to determine statistical significance. Significant convergence between adjacent sites was found in all variates when species weighted either by percentage cover or cover rank were used to calculate site texture means, but convergence was less pronounced among groups of five or 10 consecutive sites. Significant divergence occurred at the five-site level (three variates) using cover rank as a weighting factor and at the two-, five- and 10-site levels (five variates) when no weighting factor was used. Overall, divergence was more pronounced among sets of sites spanning a wider range in altitude, which seemed consistent with the presence of an environmental gradient along the transect, although a DCA ordination of site floristics failed to reveal a simple altitudinal trend. This study is the first to seek community-level convergence within a local area and the first to find statistically significant convergence between vegetation patches.

[1]  William G. Lee,et al.  An Assembly Rule in the Ground and Herbaceous Strata of a New Zealand Rain Forest , 1995 .

[2]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  A demonstration of guild-based assembly rules for a plant community, and determination of intrinsic guilds , 1994 .

[3]  J. Wilson,et al.  Carr texture in Britain and New Zealand: community convergence compared with a null model , 1994 .

[4]  L. Aarssen.  Causes and consequences of variation in competitive ability in plant communities , 1992 .

[5]  J. Wilson,et al.  Does Vegetation Science exist , 1991 .

[6]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Ecological Similarity of Shrub‐Desert Avifaunas of Australia and North America , 1991 .

[7]  J. Wiens.  Ecomorphological comparisons of the shrub-desert avifaunas of Australia and North America , 1991 .

[8]  D. Schluter.  Species-for-Species Matching , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[9]  J A Drake,et al.  Communities as assembled structures: Do rules govern pattern? , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  A. Reif,et al.  Plant communities of the steep land conifer-broadleaved hardwood forests of central Westland, South Island, New Zealand , 1988 .

[11]  D. Schluter.  Tests for Similarity and Convergence of Finch Communities , 1986 .

[12]  J. Connell.  Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past , 1980 .

[13]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[14]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Experimental Studies of the Niche , 1975 .

[15]  A. Moldenke,et al.  Convergence in Vegetation Structure along Analogous Climatic Gradients in California and Chile , 1975 .

[16]  H. Mooney,et al.  CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF MEDITERRANEAN‐CLIMATE EVERGREEN SCLEROPHYLL SHRUBS , 1970, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  R. Macarthur,et al.  COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Keeley.  A Californian's view of fynbos , 1992 .

[19]  Philip H. Crowley,et al.  RESAMPLING METHODS FOR COMPUTATION-INTENSIVE DATA ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION , 1992 .

[20]  P. Wardle.  Vegetation of New Zealand , 1991 .

[21]  H. Connor,et al.  Name changes in the indigenous New Zealand flora, 1960–1986 and Nomina Nova IV, 1983–1986 , 1987 .

[22]  C. During.  Fertilisers and soils in New Zealand farming. , 1984 .

[23]  J. Barkman.  The investigation of vegetation texture and structure , 1979 .

[24]  J. Wardle,et al.  INFLUENCE OF UNGULATES ON THE FORESTS AND SCRUBLANDS OF SOUTH WESTLAND , 1971 .

[25]  H. Mooney,et al.  Vegetation Comparisons between the Mediterranean Climatic Areas of California and Chile , 1970 .

[26]  R. Specht.  A comparison of the sclerophyllous vegetation characteristic of mediterranean type climates in france california and southern australia i structure morphology and succession , 1969 .