Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose.

PURPOSE To show that prospective electrocardiographically (ECG)-triggered coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography (hereafter, prospective CT angiography) is at least as effective as retrospective ECG-gated coronary CT angiography (hereafter, retrospective CT angiography). MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Sixty patients with heart rates of less than 75 beats per minute who were referred for coronary CT angiography were enrolled. Both prospective and retrospective CT angiography were performed with a 64-detector scanner. Data acquisition times were recorded. Two independent cardiac radiologists evaluated subjective image quality (1, excellent; 4, poor) and severity of stenosis (0% occlusion, 1%-49% occlusion, 50%-75% occlusion, and >75% occlusion) with the 17-segment American Heart Association classification model. Discrepancies were settled by consensus. Effective radiation doses of prospective and retrospective CT angiography were calculated with volume CT dose index. Data regarding acquisition time and radiation exposure for prospective and retrospective CT angiography were compared. The Student t test was performed, and kappa statistics were calculated. RESULTS Mean data acquisition time of prospective CT angiography was shorter than that of retrospective CT angiography (5.6 seconds +/- 1.1 [standard deviation] vs 6.7 seconds +/- 1.1, respectively; P < .01). Consensus-determined image quality in coronary artery branches was similar between prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography (1.15 vs 1.13, respectively; P = .992). Excellent agreement between prospective CT angiography and retrospective CT angiography was observed in the detection of significant (>or=50% occlusion) coronary artery stenoses per segment (kappa = 0.882) and in the grading of stenoses per patient (kappa = 0.829). Calculated effective dose with prospective CT angiography was 79% lower than that with retrospective CT angiography (4.1 mSv +/- 1.8 vs 20.0 mSv +/- 3.5, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION Prospective CT angiography can reduce radiation dose below that of retrospective CT angiography with dose modulation, while maintaining image quality and the ability to assess luminal obstructions in patients with heart rates of less than 75 beats per minute.

[1]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiolog , 2006, Circulation.

[2]  M. Reiser,et al.  Ultra-high-resolution mode for the assessment of coronary artery stents-ex vivo imaging with 64-slice computed tomography. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[3]  R. Morin,et al.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. , 2003, Circulation.

[4]  J. Debatin,et al.  Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[5]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[6]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Benjamin M Yeh,et al.  Peripheral zone prostate cancer: accuracy of different interpretative approaches with MR and MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[8]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[9]  B. Hamm,et al.  Multislice CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of Sublingual Nitroglycerine on the Diameter of Coronary Arteries , 2006, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[10]  Satoshi Ogawa,et al.  Novel Method of Displaying Coronary CT Angiography , 2006 .

[11]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[12]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[13]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  High-Resolution Spiral Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients Referred for Diagnostic Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2005, Circulation.

[14]  A de Roos,et al.  Artifacts in ECG-synchronized MDCT coronary angiography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. Budoff,et al.  Cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)-a comparison in detecting significant coronary artery disease. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[16]  M. Reiser,et al.  Image Quality, Motion Artifacts, and Reconstruction Timing of 64-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography With 0.33-Second Rotation Speed , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Thomas J Vogl,et al.  Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[18]  J. Paul,et al.  MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial. , 2007, European heart journal.

[21]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. , 2006, Medical physics.

[22]  Massimo Midiri,et al.  Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart rhythm irregularities using ECG editing. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Satoshi Ogawa,et al.  Novel method of displaying coronary CT angiography: Angiographic view. , 2006, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.