An Integrated Strategy for Analyzing the Unique Developmental Programs of Different Myoblast Subtypes

An important but largely unmet challenge in understanding the mechanisms that govern the formation of specific organs is to decipher the complex and dynamic genetic programs exhibited by the diversity of cell types within the tissue of interest. Here, we use an integrated genetic, genomic, and computational strategy to comprehensively determine the molecular identities of distinct myoblast subpopulations within the Drosophila embryonic mesoderm at the time that cell fates are initially specified. A compendium of gene expression profiles was generated for primary mesodermal cells purified by flow cytometry from appropriately staged wild-type embryos and from 12 genotypes in which myogenesis was selectively and predictably perturbed. A statistical meta-analysis of these pooled datasets—based on expected trends in gene expression and on the relative contribution of each genotype to the detection of known muscle genes—provisionally assigned hundreds of differentially expressed genes to particular myoblast subtypes. Whole embryo in situ hybridizations were then used to validate the majority of these predictions, thereby enabling true-positive detection rates to be estimated for the microarray data. This combined analysis reveals that myoblasts exhibit much greater gene expression heterogeneity and overall complexity than was previously appreciated. Moreover, it implicates the involvement of large numbers of uncharacterized, differentially expressed genes in myogenic specification and subsequent morphogenesis. These findings also underscore a requirement for considerable regulatory specificity for generating diverse myoblast identities. Finally, to illustrate how the developmental functions of newly identified myoblast genes can be efficiently surveyed, a rapid RNA interference assay that can be scored in living embryos was developed and applied to selected genes. This integrated strategy for examining embryonic gene expression and function provides a substantially expanded framework for further studies of this model developmental system.

[1]  Stephen S. Gisselbrecht,et al.  Ras Pathway Specificity Is Determined by the Integration of Multiple Signal-Activated and Tissue-Restricted Transcription Factors , 2000, Cell.

[2]  M. Scott,et al.  Notch and Ras signaling pathway effector genes expressed in fusion competent and founder cells during Drosophila myogenesis , 2003, Development.

[3]  L. Cooley,et al.  Profilin mutations disrupt multiple actin-dependent processes during Drosophila development. , 1994, Development.

[4]  V. Beneš,et al.  A genomic switch at the transition from cell proliferation to terminal differentiation in the Drosophila eye. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[5]  M. Frasch,et al.  Induction of visceral and cardiac mesoderm by ectodermal Dpp in the early Drosophila embryo , 1995, Nature.

[6]  E. Furlong.  Integrating transcriptional and signalling networks during muscle development. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[7]  M. Bate,et al.  Drosophila Dumbfounded A Myoblast Attractant Essential for Fusion , 2000, Cell.

[8]  M. Frasch,et al.  The role of the NK-homeobox gene slouch (S59) in somatic muscle patterning. , 1999, Development.

[9]  Seung K. Kim,et al.  Signaling and transcriptional control of pancreatic organogenesis. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[10]  G. Mardon,et al.  R8 development in the Drosophila eye: a paradigm for neural selection and differentiation. , 2002, Development.

[11]  M. Suster,et al.  myoblasts incompetent encodes a zinc finger transcription factor required to specify fusion-competent myoblasts in Drosophila. , 2002, Development.

[12]  Stephen S. Gisselbrecht,et al.  Combinatorial signaling codes for the progressive determination of cell fates in the Drosophila embryonic mesoderm. , 1998, Genes & development.

[13]  M. Bate,et al.  Segregation of myogenic lineages in Drosophila requires numb. , 1997, Development.

[14]  M. Levine,et al.  Genomic regulatory networks and animal development. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[15]  G. van den Engh,et al.  Characterization of differentially expressed genes in purified Drosophila follicle cells: toward a general strategy for cell type-specific developmental analysis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Frasch,et al.  Molecular integration of inductive and mesoderm-intrinsic inputs governs even-skipped enhancer activity in a subset of pericardial and dorsal muscle progenitors. , 2001, Developmental biology.

[17]  Marc S Halfon,et al.  Reciprocal regulatory interactions between the Notch and Ras signaling pathways in the Drosophila embryonic mesoderm. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[18]  M. Bate,et al.  Expression of a MyoD family member prefigures muscle pattern in Drosophila embryos. , 1990, Genes & development.

[19]  J. Posakony,et al.  Genetic programs activated by proneural proteins in the developing Drosophila PNS. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[20]  S. Orsulic,et al.  Negative regulation of Armadillo, a Wingless effector in Drosophila. , 1997, Development.

[21]  Debashis Ghosh,et al.  Statistical issues and methods for meta-analysis of microarray data: a case study in prostate cancer , 2003, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[22]  L. Cooley,et al.  Understanding the function of actin-binding proteins through genetic analysis of Drosophila oogenesis. , 2002, Annual review of genetics.

[23]  Michael Levine,et al.  Whole-Genome Analysis of Dorsal-Ventral Patterning in the Drosophila Embryo , 2002, Cell.

[24]  Stephen S. Gisselbrecht,et al.  New fluorescent protein reporters for use with the drosophila gal4 expression system and for vital detection of balancer chromosomes , 2002, Genesis.

[25]  C. Goodman,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Myoblast Fusion: blown fuse Is Required for Progression Beyond the Prefusion Complex , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  M. Bate,et al.  Mutations in a novel gene, myoblast city, provide evidence in support of the founder cell hypothesis for Drosophila muscle development. , 1995, Development.

[27]  M. Bate,et al.  A dual requirement for neurogenic genes in Drosophila myogenesis. , 1993, Development.

[28]  M. Affolter,et al.  The Drosophila protein Dof is specifically required for FGF signaling. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[29]  A. Nose,et al.  Regional specification of muscle progenitors in Drosophila: the role of the msh homeobox gene. , 1998, Development.

[30]  Hanh T. Nguyen,et al.  Drosophila Lame duck, a novel member of the Gli superfamily, acts as a key regulator of myogenesis by controlling fusion-competent myoblast development. , 2001, Development.

[31]  M. Bate,et al.  Specific muscle identities are regulated by Krüppel during Drosophila embryogenesis. , 1997, Development.

[32]  E. Davidson.  Genomic Regulatory Systems: Development and Evolution , 2005 .

[33]  M. Bate,et al.  A distinct set of founders and fusion-competent myoblasts make visceral muscles in the Drosophila embryo. , 2001, Development.

[34]  T. Schüpbach,et al.  Ectopic activation of torpedo/Egfr, a Drosophila receptor tyrosine kinase, dorsalizes both the eggshell and the embryo. , 1997, Development.

[35]  B. Frey,et al.  The functional landscape of mouse gene expression , 2004, Journal of biology.

[36]  D. Melton,et al.  Single-cell transcript analysis of pancreas development. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[37]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. , 1993, Development.

[38]  R. Carthew,et al.  Use of dsRNA-Mediated Genetic Interference to Demonstrate that frizzled and frizzled 2 Act in the Wingless Pathway , 1998, Cell.

[39]  Elizabeth H. Chen,et al.  Antisocial, an intracellular adaptor protein, is required for myoblast fusion in Drosophila. , 2001, Developmental cell.

[40]  Marc S Halfon,et al.  Computation-based discovery of related transcriptional regulatory modules and motifs using an experimentally validated combinatorial model. , 2002, Genome research.

[41]  A. Michelson,et al.  A role for the Drosophila neurogenic genes in mesoderm differentiation , 1991, Cell.

[42]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  A Gene Expression Map for Caenorhabditis elegans , 2001, Science.

[43]  G. Stormo,et al.  Identification of a novel cis-regulatory element involved in the heat shock response in Caenorhabditis elegans using microarray gene expression and computational methods. , 2002, Genome research.

[44]  M. Frasch,et al.  Wingless effects mesoderm patterning and ectoderm segmentation events via induction of its downstream target sloppy paired. , 2000, Development.

[45]  G. Bouffard,et al.  Gene discovery using computational and microarray analysis of transcription in the Drosophila melanogaster testis. , 2000, Genome research.

[46]  Zhe Han,et al.  Transcriptional integration of competence modulated by mutual repression generates cell-type specificity within the cardiogenic mesoderm. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[47]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Elizabeth H. Chen,et al.  Towards a molecular pathway for myoblast fusion in Drosophila. , 2004, Trends in cell biology.

[49]  K. White,et al.  Patterns of Gene Expression During Drosophila Mesoderm Development , 2001, Science.

[50]  S. M. Abmayr,et al.  Drosophila myoblast city Encodes a Conserved Protein That Is Essential for Myoblast Fusion, Dorsal Closure, and Cytoskeletal Organization , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[51]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[52]  A. Michelson,et al.  Invertebrate myogenesis: looking back to the future of muscle development. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[53]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Segmentation and specification of the Drosophila mesoderm. , 1996, Genes & development.

[54]  G. Struhl,et al.  Direct and Long-Range Action of a DPP Morphogen Gradient , 1996, Cell.

[55]  N. Gostling,et al.  From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design , 2002, Heredity.

[56]  H. Heng,et al.  Down-regulation of a novel actin-binding molecule, skeletrophin, in malignant melanoma. , 2003, The American journal of pathology.

[57]  Stephen S. Gisselbrecht,et al.  Heartbroken is a specific downstream mediator of FGF receptor signalling in Drosophila. , 1998, Development.

[58]  E. Davidson,et al.  Gene regulatory networks for development. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  B. S. Baker,et al.  Gene Expression During the Life Cycle of Drosophila melanogaster , 2002, Science.

[60]  M. W. Young,et al.  Antineurogenic phenotypes induced by truncated Notch proteins indicate a role in signal transduction and may point to a novel function for Notch in nuclei. , 1993, Genes & development.

[61]  S. M. Abmayr,et al.  Drosophila SNS, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is essential for myoblast fusion. , 2000, Genes & development.

[62]  Junhyong Kim,et al.  Unwrapping Glial Biology Gcm Target Genes Regulating Glial Development, Diversification, and Function , 2003, Neuron.

[63]  W. Chia,et al.  Inscuteable and numb mediate asymmetric muscle progenitor cell divisions during Drosophila myogenesis. , 1998, Genes & development.

[64]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  Genome-wide high-throughput screens in functional genomics. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[65]  R. Waterston,et al.  The unc-45 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans is an essential muscle-affecting gene with maternal expression. , 1990, Genetics.