Diagonally optimized spread: an optimized spread for quantifying local stationarity

In previous work, the spread has been presented as a means to quantify stationarity. This is done by estimating the support of the joint time-frequency correlation function known as the expected ambiguity function. Two fundamental issues concerning the spread are addressed here. The first is that the spread is not invariant under basis transformation. We address this problem by introducing the diagonally optimized spread, based on the proposition that the spread should be calculated using the covariance that is most nearly diagonal under basis transformation. The second issue is that in previous references to spread, the availability of covariance estimates have been assumed, which is an open problem non-stationary processes. A method to provide estimates of locally stationary processes was proposed by Mallat, Papanicolaou and Zhang. In their work they derive a method which calculates the basis which most nearly diagonalize the covariance matrix in the mean square sense. This method is ideally suited to our situation, and we extend it to include calculation of the diagonally optimized spread. The optimally diagonalized spread provides an improved indicator of non-stationarity and illustrates the connections between spread and the diagonizability of the covariance of a random process.

[1]  Ajem Guido Janssen,et al.  On the locus and spread of pseudo-density functions in the time-frequency plane , 1982 .

[2]  W. Kozek,et al.  On the generalized Weyl correspondence and its application to time-frequency analysis of linear time-varying systems , 1992, [1992] Proceedings of the IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis.

[3]  Leon Cohen,et al.  Generalized ambiguity functions , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[4]  Gerald Matz,et al.  Generalized evolutionary spectral analysis and the Weyl spectrum of nonstationary random processes , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  B. W. Suter,et al.  The numerical spread as a measure of non-stationarity: boundary effects in the numerical expected ambiguity function , 2000, Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing (Cat. No.00TH8496).

[6]  L. Cohen Generalized Phase-Space Distribution Functions , 1966 .

[7]  S. Mallat,et al.  Adaptive covariance estimation of locally stationary processes , 1998 .

[8]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  S. Mallat,et al.  Estimating covariances of locally stationary processes: consistency of best basis methods , 1996, Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis (TFTS-96).

[10]  S. Mallat,et al.  Estimating Covariances of Locally Stationary Processes : Rates of Convergence of Best Basis Methods , 1998 .

[11]  W. Kozek,et al.  Correlative time-frequency analysis and classification of nonstationary random processes , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time- Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis.

[12]  Werner Kozek Optimally Karhunen-Loeve-like STFT expansion of nonstationary processes , 1993, 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.