Functional assignment of MAPK phosphatase domains

Mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways are well conserved in most organisms, from yeast to humans. The principal components of these pathways are MAP kinases whose activity is regulated by phosphorylation, implicating various MAPK protein effectors—in particular, protein phosphatases that inactivate MAPKs by dephosphorylation. The molecular basis of binding specificity of such regulatory phosphatases to MAPKs is poorly understood. To try to pinpoint potential functional regions within the sequences and to help identify new family members, we have applied a multimotif pattern‐recognition approach to characterize two MAPK phosphatase subfamilies (tyrosine‐specific and dual specificity) that are crucial in the regulation of MAPKs. We built “fingerprints” for these two subfamilies that are unique to, and highly discriminatory for, each group of proteins. The fingerprints were used in a genome‐wide screen, identifying more than 80 MAPK phosphatase domains, several of which were in partial sequences or unclassified proteins. We confirmed experimentally that one predicted MAPK phosphatase orthologue in Xenopus binds to ERK1/2, suggesting a role in MAPK signaling and thus supporting our functional predictions. Further analysis, mapping the fingerprints on the three‐dimensional structure of MAPK phosphatases, revealed that some of the fingerprint motifs reside in the N‐terminal noncatalytic regions coinciding with reported MAPK binding sites, while others lie within the catalytic phosphatase domain. These results also suggest the presence of putative allosteric sites in the catalytic region for modulation of protein–protein interactions, and provide a framework for future experimental validation. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Keyse,et al.  Protein phosphatases and the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  Anna Gaulton,et al.  Bioinformatics approaches for the classification of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 2003, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[3]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides biochemical and structural information for budding yeast proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Ming-Ming Zhou,et al.  Structure and regulation of MAPK phosphatases. , 2004, Cellular signalling.

[5]  Ricardo M Biondi,et al.  Signalling specificity of Ser/Thr protein kinases through docking-site-mediated interactions. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[6]  T. Mustelin,et al.  Structure of the hematopoietic tyrosine phosphatase (HePTP) catalytic domain: structure of a KIM phosphatase with phosphate bound at the active site. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  K Kornfeld,et al.  Multiple docking sites on substrate proteins form a modular system that mediates recognition by ERK MAP kinase. , 1999, Genes & development.

[8]  S. Keyse,et al.  Amino acid sequence similarity between CL100, a dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatase and cdc25. , 1993, TIBS -Trends in Biochemical Sciences. Regular ed.

[9]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  Docking sites on mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinases, MAPK phosphatases and the Elk-1 transcription factor compete for MAPK binding and are crucial for enzymic activity. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[10]  H. Hirt,et al.  Plant MAP kinase pathways: how many and what for? , 2001, Biology of the cell.

[11]  T. K. Attwood,et al.  ADSP - a new package for computational sequence analysis , 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[12]  S. Keyse,et al.  Crystal structure of the MAPK phosphatase Pyst1 catalytic domain and implications for regulated activation , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[13]  F. Wang,et al.  Mapping ERK2-MKP3 Binding Interfaces by Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  R. Pulido,et al.  Interaction of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases with the Kinase Interaction Motif of the Tyrosine Phosphatase PTP-SL Provides Substrate Specificity and Retains ERK2 in the Cytoplasm* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  P G Drake,et al.  Structural and Evolutionary Relationships among Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Domains , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  S. Luan,et al.  Identification of a dual-specificity protein phosphatase that inactivates a MAP kinase from Arabidopsis. , 1998, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[18]  A. Scheidig,et al.  Crystal structure of PTP-SL/PTPBR7 catalytic domain: implications for MAP kinase regulation. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  K. Shinozaki,et al.  Distinct regulation of salinity and genotoxic stress responses by Arabidopsis MAP kinase phosphatase 1 , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[20]  K. Shinozaki,et al.  Environmental stress response in plants: the role of mitogen-activated protein kinases. , 1997, Trends in biotechnology.

[21]  M. Wilkinson,et al.  Pyp1 and Pyp2 PTPases dephosphorylate an osmosensing MAP kinase controlling cell size at division in fission yeast. , 1995, Genes & development.

[22]  A. Ashworth,et al.  MAP kinase phosphatases , 2002, Genome Biology.

[23]  M. Muda,et al.  MKP-3, a Novel Cytosolic Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase That Exemplifies a New Class of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  E. Nishida,et al.  Docking interactions in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. , 2002, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[25]  S. Knapp,et al.  Crystal structures and inhibitor identification for PTPN5, PTPRR and PTPN7: a family of human MAPK-specific protein tyrosine phosphatases. , 2006, The Biochemical journal.

[26]  Michael Gribskov,et al.  The Complement of Protein Phosphatase Catalytic Subunits Encoded in the Genome of Arabidopsis1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[27]  S. Luan,et al.  ATMPK4, an Arabidopsis homolog of mitogen-activated protein kinase, is activated in vitro by AtMEK1 through threonine phosphorylation. , 2000, Plant physiology.

[28]  A. Sharrocks,et al.  Docking domains and substrate-specificity determination for MAP kinases. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[29]  Keith Gull,et al.  New tubulins in protozoal parasites , 2000, Current Biology.

[30]  César Nombela,et al.  Protein phosphatases in MAPK signalling: we keep learning from yeast , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[31]  K. Guan,et al.  A specific protein-protein interaction accounts for the in vivo substrate selectivity of Ptp3 towards the Fus3 MAP kinase. , 1999, Genes & development.

[32]  T. Mustelin,et al.  Inhibitory Role for Dual Specificity Phosphatase VHR in T Cell Antigen Receptor and CD28-induced Erk and Jnk Activation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  M. Muda,et al.  The Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase-3 N-terminal Noncatalytic Region Is Responsible for Tight Substrate Binding and Enzymatic Specificity* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  P. Cohen,et al.  Inactivation of p42 MAP kinase by protein phosphatase 2A and a protein tyrosine phosphatase, but not CL100, in various cell lines , 1995, Current Biology.

[35]  H. Madhani,et al.  Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[36]  A. Godzik,et al.  The dual-specific protein tyrosine phosphatase family , 2004 .

[37]  T. Attwood,et al.  Phylogenomic analysis and evolution of the potassium channel gene family. , 2003, Receptors & channels.

[38]  E. Nishida,et al.  A conserved docking motif in MAP kinases common to substrates, activators and regulators , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[39]  T K Attwood,et al.  A compendium of specific motifs for diagnosing GPCR subtypes. , 2001, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[40]  Ping-yuan Wang,et al.  A cholesterol‐regulated PP2A/HePTP complex with dual specificity ERK1/2 phosphatase activity , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[41]  J. Thornton,et al.  Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[42]  T. Sturgill,et al.  Rapid stimulation by insulin of a serine/threonine kinase in 3T3-L1 adipocytes that phosphorylates microtubule-associated protein 2 in vitro. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Kazuo Shinozaki,et al.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature. , 2002, Trends in plant science.

[44]  E. Nishida,et al.  Modular Structure of a Docking Surface on MAPK Phosphatases* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  M. Camps,et al.  Dual specificity phosphatases: a gene family for control of MAP kinase function , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[46]  A. Mushegian,et al.  Genome sequence and gene expression of Bacillus anthracis bacteriophage Fah. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  S. R. Pettifer,et al.  UTOPIA—User-Friendly Tools for Operating Informatics Applications , 2004, Comparative and functional genomics.

[48]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Multiple Regions of MAP Kinase Phosphatase 3 Are Involved in Its Recognition and Activation by ERK2* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  R. Pulido,et al.  Differential interaction of the tyrosine phosphatases PTP-SL, STEP and HePTP with the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK1/2 and p38alpha is determined by a kinase specificity sequence and influenced by reducing agents. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[50]  M. Cobb,et al.  ERKs, extracellular signal-regulated MAP-2 kinases. , 1991, Current opinion in cell biology.

[51]  M. L. Connolly.  Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[52]  K. Matsumoto,et al.  MSG5, a novel protein phosphatase promotes adaptation to pheromone response in S. cerevisiae. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[53]  T. Yanase,et al.  Dehydroepiandrosterone negatively regulates the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by a novel mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[54]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000 , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[55]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[56]  Terri K. Attwood,et al.  FingerPRINTScan: intelligent searching of the PRINTS motif database , 1999, Bioinform..

[57]  G. Rubin,et al.  PTP-ER, a novel tyrosine phosphatase, functions downstream of Ras1 to downregulate MAP kinase during Drosophila eye development. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[58]  J. Denu,et al.  Extracellular Regulated Kinases (ERK) 1 and ERK2 Are Authentic Substrates for the Dual-specificity Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase VHR , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  D S Lawrence,et al.  Identification of a second aryl phosphate-binding site in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B: a paradigm for inhibitor design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Terri K. Attwood,et al.  PRINTS and its automatic supplement, prePRINTS , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[61]  A. Ullrich,et al.  PTP‐SL and STEP protein tyrosine phosphatases regulate the activation of the extracellular signal‐regulated kinases ERK1 and ERK2 by association through a kinase interaction motif , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[62]  Evelyn Camon,et al.  The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[63]  Ming-Ming Zhou,et al.  Solution structure of the MAPK phosphatase PAC-1 catalytic domain. Insights into substrate-induced enzymatic activation of MKP. , 2003, Structure.

[64]  Ming-Ming Zhou,et al.  Solution structure of ERK2 binding domain of MAPK phosphatase MKP-3: structural insights into MKP-3 activation by ERK2. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[65]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  InterProScan - an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro , 2001, Bioinform..