Optimal design for individualised passive assistance

Assistive devices are capable of restoring independence and function to people suffering from musculoskeletal impairments. Traditional assistive exoskeletons can be divided into active or passive devices depending on the method used to provide joint torques. The design of these devices often does not take into account the abilities of the individual leading to complex designs, joint misalignment and muscular atrophy due to over assistance at each joint. We present a novel framework for the design of passive assistive devices whereby the device provides the minimal amount of assistance required to maximise the space that they can reach. In doing so, we effectively remap their capable torque load over their workspace, exercising existing muscle while ensuring that key points in the workspace are reached. In this way we hope to reduce the risk of muscular atrophy while assisting with tasks. We implement two methods for finding the necessary passive device parameters, one looks at static loading conditions while the second simulates the system dynamics using level set methods. This allows us to determine the set of points that an individual can hold their arms stationary, the statically achievable workspace (SAW). We show the efficacy of these methods on a number of case studies which show that individuals with pronounced muscle weakness and asymmetric muscle weakness can have restored SAW restoring a range of motion.

[1]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[2]  J. Hsu,et al.  Mobile arm supports: criteria for successful use in muscle disease patients. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  J. Lofberg,et al.  YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37508).

[4]  Fan Gao,et al.  Effects of joint alignment and type on mechanical properties of thermoplastic articulated ankle-foot orthosis , 2011, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[5]  S.J. Ball,et al.  MEDARM: a rehabilitation robot with 5DOF at the shoulder complex , 2007, 2007 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics.

[6]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimization of a Parallel Shoulder Mechanism to Achieve a High-Force, Low-Mass, Robotic-Arm Exoskeleton , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[7]  Ian M. Mitchell,et al.  Overapproximating Reachable Sets by Hamilton-Jacobi Projections , 2003, J. Sci. Comput..

[8]  J.C. Perry,et al.  Upper-Limb Powered Exoskeleton Design , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[9]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Design and Optimization of a Cable Driven Upper Arm Exoskeleton , 2009 .

[10]  A. Papachristodoulou,et al.  A tutorial on sum of squares techniques for systems analysis , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[11]  Ian M. Mitchell The Flexible, Extensible and Efficient Toolbox of Level Set Methods , 2008, J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  C. Carignan,et al.  Design of an arm exoskeleton with scapula motion for shoulder rehabilitation , 2005, ICAR '05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005..

[13]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  Convex optimization of nonlinear feedback controllers via occupation measures , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Dikai Liu,et al.  Human Biomechanical Model Based Optimal Design of Assistive Shoulder Exoskeleton , 2013, FSR.

[15]  Stepán Obdrzálek,et al.  Upper Extremity Reachable Workspace Evaluation with Kinect , 2013, MMVR.

[16]  Antoine Girard,et al.  SpaceEx: Scalable Verification of Hybrid Systems , 2011, CAV.

[17]  George J. Pappas,et al.  A Framework for Worst-Case and Stochastic Safety Verification Using Barrier Certificates , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  F.C.T. van der Helm,et al.  Kinematic Design to Improve Ergonomics in Human Machine Interaction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Development and Application of Stereo Camera-Based Upper Extremity Workspace Evaluation in Patients with Neuromuscular Diseases , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  T. Rahman,et al.  A body-powered functional upper limb orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  Gentiane Venture,et al.  Calibration Method of the Human-Body Segment Inertial Parameters Using Inverse Dynamics, LS Technique and a Priori Anatomical Values , 2012, SyRoCo.

[22]  Wisama Khalil,et al.  Modeling, Identification and Control of Robots , 2003 .

[23]  John T. McConville,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF INERTIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1975 .

[24]  Whitney Sample,et al.  Wilmington Robotic Exoskeleton: A Novel Device to Maintain Arm Improvement in Muscular Disease , 2011, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[25]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of a 3D Vision Sensor-based Upper Extremity Reachable Workspace Evaluation in Neuromuscular Diseases , 2013, PLoS currents.

[26]  G R Johnson,et al.  The design of a five-degree-of-freedom powered orthosis for the upper limb , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[27]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of an Active 1-DOF Lower-Limb Exoskeleton with Inertia Compensation , 2010 .

[28]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of an active one-degree-of-freedom lower-limb exoskeleton with inertia compensation , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[29]  D. Anton Occupational biomechanics , 1986 .

[30]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Optimization and Design of a Cable Driven Upper Arm Exoskeleton , 2009 .