A Call for New Communication Channels for Gynecological Oncology Trainees: A Survey on Social Media Use and Educational Needs by the European Network of Young Gynecological Oncologists

Objective The aim of the study was to assess patterns in the use of social media (SM) platforms and to identify the training needs among European gynecologic oncology trainees. Methods In 2014, a web-based survey was sent to 633 trainees from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO) database. The 14-item questionnaire (partially using a 1- to 5-point Likert scale) assessed respondents' use of SM and preference for workshop content and organization. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the mean scores reported for different items, and the internal reliability of the questionnaire was assessed by Cronbach &agr;. Results In total, 170 ENYGO members (27%) responded to the survey. Of those, 91% said that they use SM platforms, mostly for private purposes. Twenty-three percent used SM professionally and 43% indicated that they would consider SM to be a clinical discussion forum. The respondents said that they would like updates on conferences and professional activities to be shared on SM platforms. Complication management, surgical anatomy, and state of the art in gynecologic oncology were identified as preferred workshops topics. The most frequently indicated hands-on workshops were laparoscopic techniques and surgical anatomy. Consultants attached a higher level of importance to palliative care education and communication training than trainees. The mean duration of the workshop preferred was 2 days. Conclusions This report highlights the significance of ENYGO trainees' attachment to SM platforms. Most respondents expect ENYGO to use these online channels for promoting educational activities and other updates. Using SM for clinical discussion will require specific guidelines to secure professional and also consumer integrity. This survey confirms surgical management and the state of the art as important knowledge gaps, and ENYGO has tailored its activities according to these results. Future activities will further direct attention and resources to education in palliative care and molecular tumor biology.

[1]  R. Brady,et al.  Social Media Use among United Kingdom Vascular Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study. , 2016, Annals of vascular surgery.

[2]  Paul M. Parizel,et al.  Radiologists’ Usage of Social Media: Results of the RANSOM Survey , 2016, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  E. Brooks,et al.  Social Media Use Among Physicians and Trainees: Results of a National Medical Oncology Physician Survey. , 2016, Journal of oncology practice.

[4]  O. Dicle,et al.  How Turkish radiology residents access information related to their profession in this social media and smartphone era , 2015, European journal of radiology open.

[5]  Carlton J. Covey,et al.  Social media beliefs and usage among family medicine residents and practicing family physicians. , 2015, Family medicine.

[6]  R. Brady,et al.  Contemporary use of social media by consultant colorectal surgeons , 2015, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[7]  N. Khemapech,et al.  Palliative Care Education in Gynecologic Oncology: a Survey of Gynecologic Oncologists and Gynecologic Oncology Fellows in Thailand. , 2015, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[8]  Anthony Harris,et al.  How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  K. Osann,et al.  Assessment of palliative care training in gynecologic oncology: a gynecologic oncology fellow research network study. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  C. Simmons,et al.  Social media in cancer care: opportunities to improve care in locally advanced breast cancer , 2014, Current opinion in supportive and palliative care.

[11]  Brent I Fox,et al.  Social media in pharmacy: heeding its call, leveraging its power. , 2013, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA.

[12]  Vineet M Arora,et al.  Online Medical Professionalism: Patient and Public Relationships: Policy Statement From the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  M. Gultekin,et al.  The Need for More Workshops in Laparoscopic Surgery and Surgical Anatomy for European Gynaecological Oncology Trainees: A Survey by the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists , 2013, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[14]  A. Osman,et al.  Online professionalism and Facebook – Falling through the generation gap , 2012, Medical teacher.

[15]  Robert S. Miller,et al.  Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice. , 2012, Journal of oncology practice.

[16]  I. Manyonda,et al.  Refusal of blood transfusion by Jehovah's Witness women: a survey of current management in obstetric and gynaecological practice in the U.K. , 2012, Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue.

[17]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  Reviewing social media use by clinicians , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  D. Frosch The Patient–Doctor Relationship and Online Social Networks: Results of a National Survey , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[19]  Rebecca Shore,et al.  Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media , 2011, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[20]  T. Baskett,et al.  The use of intraoperative cystoscopy by general gynaecologists in Canada. , 2009, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[21]  A. Assche European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , 2006 .