Limited value of vaginal cytology in detecting recurrent disease after radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of vaginal cytology in routine surveillance for recurrent cervical cancer after surgery. We reviewed the medical records of 565 patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer who were treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) and attended follow- up at Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 2000 and May 2006. With the median follow-up of 35 months (range 1-76 months), 23 (4%) patients developed recurrence. The interval from surgery to detection of recurrence ranged from 5-61 months with a median of 23 months. Of the total 4,376 vaginal smears, 5 (0.1%) showed abnormal cytology but only 1 had malignant cells and tumor recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of vaginal cytology for detection of recurrence were 4.3% and 99.3%, respectively. In conclusion, vaginal cytology has limited value in detection of recurrence after RHPL for early-stage cervical cancer.

[1]  C. Haie-meder,et al.  Value of routine follow-up procedures for patients with stage I/II cervical cancer treated with combined surgery-radiation therapy. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  J. Wharton,et al.  Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an outcomes analysis. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Recurrent Stage IB cervical carcinoma: evaluation of the effectiveness of routine follow up surveillance , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  I. Duncan,et al.  Is there any value in the long term follow up of women treated for endometrial cancer? , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  S. Wilailak,et al.  Prognostic factors associated with recurrence in stage IB cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. , 1993, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[6]  R. G. Wright,et al.  The accuracy of cervicovaginal cytology in the detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma following radiotherapy. , 1991, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  D. Clarke-Pearson,et al.  A comparison of symptomatology, physical examination, and vaginal cytology in the detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Nikolaos Gkantidis,et al.  Clinical Significance , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  C. Stringer,et al.  Diagnosis of Recurrent Cervical Carcinoma After Radical Hysterectomy , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  B. Sevin,et al.  Recurrent Cancer of the Cervix Following Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection , 1980, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  W. Wentz,et al.  Clinical significance of postirradiation dysplasia of the uterine cervix. , 1970, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  R. Silberman.  Recurrent Cancer , 1959 .