The Attitudes to Disability Scale (ADS): development and psychometric properties.

BACKGROUND This paper describes the development of an Attitudes to Disability Scale for use with adults with physical or intellectual disabilities (ID). The aim of the research was to design a scale that could be used to assess the personal attitudes of individuals with either physical or ID. METHOD The measure was derived following standard WHOQOL methodology as part of an international trial. In the pilot phase of the study, 12 centres from around the world carried out focus groups with people with physical disabilities, people with ID, with their carers, and with relevant professionals in order to identify themes relevant for attitudes to disability. Items generated from the focus groups were then tested in a pilot study with 1400 respondents from 15 different centres worldwide, with items being tested and reduced using both classical and modern psychometric methods. A field trial study was then carried out with 3772 respondents, again with the use of both classical and modern psychometric methods. RESULTS The outcome of the second round of data collection and analysis is a 16-item scale that can be used for assessment of attitudes to disability in physically or intellectually disabled people and in healthy respondents. CONCLUSIONS The Attitudes to Disability Scale is a new psychometrically sound scale that can be used to assess attitudes in both physically and intellectually disabled groups. The scale is also available in both personal and general forms and in a number of different language versions.

[1]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[2]  M. Power,et al.  The attitudes to ageing questionnaire (AAQ): development and psychometric properties , 2007, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[3]  M. Power,et al.  Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment , 1998 .

[4]  P. Kline Handbook of Psychological Testing , 2013 .

[5]  J. Pater Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials , 1996 .

[6]  M. Albornoz Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[7]  M Bullinger,et al.  The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of Quality of Life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[8]  K. Ellis Disability rights in practice: the relationship between human rights and social rights in contemporary social care , 2005 .

[9]  Mike Bury A comment on the ICIDH2 , 2000 .

[10]  J. Rose,et al.  General practitioners' attitudes to patients who have learning disabilities , 2002, Psychological Medicine.

[11]  N. Akrami,et al.  Classical and modern racial prejudice: a study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden , 2000 .

[12]  M. Power,et al.  Development of the WHOQOL disabilities module , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[13]  David Cella,et al.  Creating and Evaluating Cross-Cultual Instruments , 1996 .

[14]  Rachael Williams,et al.  A measure of perceived stigma in people with intellectual disability , 2008, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[15]  H. Livneh,et al.  Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  Norman Sartorius,et al.  Stigma: ignorance, prejudice or discrimination? , 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[17]  Silke Schmidt,et al.  Development of the WHOQOL-Old Module , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  P. Borry,et al.  The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. , 2005, Bioethics.