The Spatial Structure of Observation Errors in Atmospheric Motion Vectors from Geostationary Satellite Data

Abstract This study investigates and quantifies in detail the spatial correlations of random errors in atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) derived by tracking structures in imagery from geostationary satellites. A good specification of the observation error is essential to assimilate any kind of observation for numerical weather prediction in a near-optimal way. For AMVs, height assignment, tracking of similar cloud structures, or quality control procedures may introduce spatially correlated errors. The spatial structure of the error correlations is investigated based on a 1-yr dataset of pairs of collocations between AMVs and radiosonde observations. Assuming spatially uncorrelated sonde errors, the spatial AMV error correlations are obtained over dense sonde networks. Results for operational infrared and water vapor wind datasets from Meteosat-5 and -7, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-8 and -10 (GOES-8 and -10), and Geostationary Meteorological Satellite-5 (GMS-5) are presented. Winds fr...

[1]  J. Schmetz,et al.  Operational Cloud-Motion Winds from Meteosat Infrared Images , 1993 .

[2]  R. Daley Atmospheric Data Analysis , 1991 .

[3]  H. Jean Thiébaux On approximations to geopotential and wind-field correlation structures , 1985 .

[4]  H. J. Thiébaux Anisotropic Correlation Functions for Objective Analysis , 1976 .

[5]  F. Rabier,et al.  The Interaction Between Model Resolution and Observation Resolution and Density In Data Assimilation , 2002 .

[6]  Anthony Hollingsworth,et al.  The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data , 1986 .

[7]  I. Rutherford Data Assimilation by Statistical Interpolation of Forecast Error Fields , 1972 .

[8]  N. B. Ingleby,et al.  The Met. Office global three‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme , 2000 .

[9]  Kenneth Holmlund,et al.  The Utilization of Statistical Properties of Satellite-Derived Atmospheric Motion Vectors to Derive Quality Indicators , 1998 .

[10]  Peter Talkner,et al.  Some remarks on spatial correlation function models , 1993 .

[11]  Steven J. Nieman,et al.  Fully automated cloud-drift winds in NESDIS operations , 1997 .

[12]  Roger Saunders,et al.  Impact of a New Cloud Motion Wind Product from Meteosat on NWP Analyses and Forecasts , 2001 .

[13]  Christopher S. Velden,et al.  The Impact of Satellite Winds on Experimental GFDL Hurricane Model Forecasts , 2001 .

[14]  R. S. Seaman,et al.  Absolute and Differential Accuracy of Analyses Achievable with Specified Observational Network Characteristics , 1977 .

[15]  Florence Rabier,et al.  The interaction between model resolution, observation resolution and observation density in data assimilation: A one‐dimensional study , 2002 .

[16]  Michael Rohn,et al.  Enhanced Automated Quality Control Applied to High-Density Satellite-Derived Winds , 2001 .

[17]  F. Bouttier,et al.  Observing‐system experiments in the ECMWF 4D‐Var data assimilation system , 2001 .

[18]  J. Derber,et al.  A reformulation of the background error covariance in the ECMWF global data assimilation system , 1999 .

[19]  Kenneth H. Bergman,et al.  Analysis error as a function of observation density for satellite temperature soundings with spatially correlated errors , 1976 .