A multiwavelength numerical model in support of quantitative retrievals of aerosol properties from automated lidar ceilometers and test applications for AOT and PM10 estimation

Abstract. The use of automated lidar ceilometer (ALC) systems for the aerosol vertically resolved characterization has increased in recent years thanks to their low construction and operation costs and their capability of providing continuous unattended measurements. At the same time there is a need to convert the ALC signals into usable geophysical quantities. In fact, the quantitative assessment of the aerosol properties from ALC measurements and the relevant assimilation in meteorological forecast models is amongst the main objectives of the EU COST Action TOPROF (“Towards operational ground-based profiling with ALCs, Doppler lidars and microwave radiometers for improving weather forecasts”). Concurrently, the E-PROFILE program of the European Meteorological Services Network (EUMETNET) focuses on the harmonization of ALC measurements and data provision across Europe. Within these frameworks, we implemented a model-assisted methodology to retrieve key aerosol properties (extinction coefficient, surface area, and volume) from elastic lidar and/or ALC measurements. The method is based on results from a large set of aerosol scattering simulations (Mie theory) performed at UV, visible, and near-IR wavelengths using a Monte Carlo approach to select the input aerosol microphysical properties. An average “continental aerosol type” (i.e., clean to moderately polluted continental aerosol conditions) is addressed in this study. Based on the simulation results, we derive mean functional relationships linking the aerosol backscatter coefficients to the abovementioned variables. Applied in the data inversion of single-wavelength lidars and/or ALCs, these relationships allow quantitative determination of the vertically resolved aerosol backscatter, extinction, volume, and surface area and, in turn, of the extinction-to-backscatter ratios (i.e., the lidar ratios, LRs) and extinction-to-volume conversion factor (cv) at 355, 532, and 1064 nm. These variables provide valuable information for visibility, radiative transfer, and air quality applications. This study also includes (1) validation of the model simulations with real measurements and (2) test applications of the proposed model-based ALC inversion methodology. In particular, our model simulations were compared to backscatter and extinction coefficients independently retrieved by Raman lidar systems operating at different continental sites within the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET). This comparison shows good model–measurement agreement, with LR discrepancies below 20 %. The model-assisted quantitative retrieval of both aerosol extinction and volume was then tested using raw data from three different ALCs systems (CHM 15k Nimbus), operating within the Italian Automated LIdar-CEilometer network (ALICEnet). For this purpose, a 1-year record of the ALC-derived aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at each site was compared to direct AOT measurements performed by colocated sun–sky photometers. This comparison shows an overall AOT agreement within 30 % at all sites. At one site, the model-assisted ALC estimation of the aerosol volume and mass (i.e., PM10) in the lowermost levels was compared to values measured at the surface level by colocated in situ instrumentation. Within this exercise, the ALC-derived daily-mean mass concentration was found to reproduce the corresponding (EU regulated) PM10 values measured by the local air quality agency well in terms of both temporal variability and absolute values. Although limited in space and time, the good performances of the proposed approach suggest it could possibly represent a valid option to extend the capabilities of ALCs to provide quantitative information for operational air quality and meteorological monitoring.

[1]  Benjamin M. Herman,et al.  Determination of aerosol height distributions by lidar , 1972 .

[2]  K. T. Whitby THE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SULFUR AEROSOLS , 1978 .

[3]  E. M. Patterson,et al.  Global measurements of aerosols in remote continental and marine regions: Concentrations, size distributions, and optical properties , 1980 .

[4]  J. Klett Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns. , 1981, Applied optics.

[5]  E. Eloranta,et al.  High spectral resolution lidar to measure optical scattering properties of atmospheric aerosols. 1: theory and instrumentation. , 1983, Applied optics.

[6]  Z. Kam,et al.  Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1998 .

[7]  J. Klett Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios. , 1985, Applied optics.

[8]  Eric P. Shettle,et al.  Atmospheric Aerosols: Global Climatology and Radiative Characteristics , 1991 .

[9]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar. , 1992, Applied optics.

[10]  G. Gobbi Lidar estimation of stratospheric aerosol properties: Surface, volume, and extinction to backscatter ratio , 1995 .

[11]  Study of the Boundary Layer Structure over the Paris Agglomeration as Observed During the ECLAP Experiment , 1997 .

[12]  M. Mishchenko,et al.  Modeling phase functions for dustlike tropospheric aerosols using a shape mixture of randomly oriented polydisperse spheroids , 1997 .

[13]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[14]  P. Koepke,et al.  Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC , 1998 .

[15]  O. Boucher,et al.  Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review , 2000 .

[16]  Gian Paolo Gobbi,et al.  Lidar estimation of tropospheric aerosol extinction, surface area and volume: Maritime and desert-dust cases , 2001 .

[17]  Jens Bösenberg,et al.  Aerosol climatology for the planetary boundary layer derived from regular lidar measurements , 2002 .

[18]  David M. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO mission: spaceborne lidar for observation of aerosols and clouds , 2003, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[19]  Gian Paolo Gobbi,et al.  Modeling the Aerosol Extinction versus Backscatter Relationship for Lidar Applications: Maritime and Continental Conditions , 2004 .

[20]  Peter Wåhlin,et al.  A European aerosol phenomenology—1: physical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe , 2004 .

[21]  M. Perrone,et al.  Extinction versus backscatter relationships for lidar applications at 351 nm: maritime and desert aerosol simulations and comparison with observations , 2004 .

[22]  Vladimir A. Kovalev,et al.  Elastic Lidar: Theory, Practice, and Analysis Methods , 2004 .

[23]  G. Gobbi,et al.  Aerosol seasonal variability over the Mediterranean region and relative impact of maritime, continental and Saharan dust particles over the basin from MODIS data in the year 2001 , 2004 .

[24]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Global indirect aerosol effects: a review , 2004 .

[25]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Inversion of Combined Radiative Transfer Models for Imaging Spectrometer and LIDAR Data , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  M. R. Perrone,et al.  Height and seasonal dependence of aerosol optical properties over southeast Italy , 2006 .

[27]  L. Mona,et al.  Saharan dust intrusions in the Mediterranean area: Three years of Raman lidar measurements , 2006 .

[28]  Oleg Dubovik,et al.  Global aerosol optical properties and application to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol retrieval over land , 2007 .

[29]  M. Perrone,et al.  Observed and simulated vertically resolved optical properties of continental aerosols over southeastern Italy: A closure study , 2007 .

[30]  Jenny L. Hand,et al.  Review of aerosol mass scattering efficiencies from ground-based measurements since 1990 , 2007 .

[31]  M. Wiegner,et al.  Vertical aerosol profiles from Raman polarization lidar observations during the dry season AMMA field campaign , 2008 .

[32]  Y. Rudich,et al.  The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like substances (HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer (CRD-AS). , 2008, Faraday discussions.

[33]  B. Stevens,et al.  Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system , 2009, Nature.

[34]  D. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm , 2009 .

[35]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Annual cycle in co-located in situ, total-column, and height- resolved aerosol observations in the Po Valley (Italy): Implications for ground-level particulate matter mass concentration estimation from remote sensing , 2010 .

[36]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET correlative measurements for CALIPSO: First intercomparison results , 2010 .

[37]  Harald Flentje,et al.  A European aerosol phenomenology 3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe , 2010 .

[38]  J. Prueger,et al.  Vertical distribution of aerosols in the vicinity of Mexico City during MILAGRO-2006 Campaign , 2010 .

[39]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination , 2010 .

[40]  W. Steinbrecht,et al.  The Eyjafjallajökull eruption in April 2010 – detection of volcanic plume using in-situ measurements, ozone sondes and lidar-ceilometer profiles , 2010 .

[41]  Vincenzo Cuomo,et al.  CIAO: the CNR-IMAA advanced observatory for atmospheric research , 2010 .

[42]  Josef Gasteiger,et al.  Volcanic ash from Iceland over Munich: mass concentration retrieved from ground-based remote sensing measurements , 2010 .

[43]  David N. Whiteman,et al.  Linear estimation of particle bulk parameters from multi-wavelength lidar measurements , 2011 .

[44]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Ash and fine-mode particle mass profiles from EARLINET-AERONET observations over central Europe after the eruptions of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in 2010 , 2011 .

[45]  Xiaoquan Song,et al.  Tracking of urban aerosols using combined LIDAR-based remote sensing and ground-based measurements , 2011 .

[46]  C. Linke,et al.  Complex refractive indices of Saharan dust samples at visible and near UV wavelengths: a laboratory study , 2011 .

[47]  L. Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Monitoring of the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic aerosol plume over the Iberian Peninsula by means of four EARLINET lidar stations , 2011 .

[48]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Saharan Mineral Dust Experiments SAMUM–1 and SAMUM–2: what have we learned? , 2011 .

[49]  P. Seifert,et al.  Profiling of fine and coarse particle mass: case studies of Saharan dust and Eyjafjallajökull/Grimsvötn volcanic plumes , 2012 .

[50]  Matthias Wiegner,et al.  Aerosol profiling with the Jenoptik ceilometer CHM15kx , 2012 .

[51]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Aerosol hygroscopicity at a regional background site (Ispra) in Northern Italy , 2012 .

[52]  B. Festy Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAAP Project. Technical Report. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 2013 , 2013 .

[53]  P. Keckhut,et al.  Midlatitude cirrus classification at Rome Tor Vergata through a multichannel Raman-Mie-Rayleigh lidar , 2013 .

[54]  Isabella Annesi-Maesano,et al.  Climate change, air pollution and extreme events leading to increasing prevalence of allergic respiratory diseases , 2013, Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine.

[55]  M. Perrone,et al.  Vertically resolved aerosol properties by multi-wavelength lidar measurements , 2013 .

[56]  G. Pappalardo,et al.  Ceilometer aerosol profiling versus Raman lidar in the frame of the INTERACT campaign of ACTRIS , 2014 .

[57]  Josef Gasteiger,et al.  Benefit of depolarization ratio at λ = 1064 nm for the retrieval of the aerosol microphysics from lidar measurements , 2014 .

[58]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET: towards an advanced sustainable European aerosol lidar network , 2014 .

[59]  V. Estellés,et al.  One Year of Measurements with a POM-02 Sky Radiometer at an Alpine EuroSkyRad Station , 2014 .

[60]  W. Thomas,et al.  What is the benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET , 2014 .

[61]  Matthew J. McGill,et al.  The Cloud-Aerosol Transport System (CATS): a technology demonstration on the International Space Station , 2015, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[62]  L. Mona,et al.  LIVAS: a 3-D multi-wavelength aerosol/cloud database based on CALIPSO and EARLINET , 2015 .

[63]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Potential of polarization lidar to provide profiles of CCN- and INP-relevant aerosol parameters , 2015 .

[64]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale , 2015, Nature.

[65]  L. Mona,et al.  CALIPSO climatological products: evaluation and suggestions from EARLINET , 2015 .

[66]  Qilong Min,et al.  Remote sensing of ground-level PM2.5 combining AOD and backscattering profile , 2016 .

[67]  Allison McComiskey,et al.  New approaches to quantifying aerosol influence on the cloud radiative effect , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Qilong Min,et al.  Remote sensing of PM2.5 during cloudy and nighttime periods using ceilometer backscatter , 2016 .

[69]  K. Pletscher,et al.  Simultaneous determination of PM fractions, particle number and particle size distribution in high time resolution applying one and the same optical measurement technique , 2016 .

[70]  M. Vaughan,et al.  An overview of the CATS level 1 processing algorithms and data products , 2016 .

[71]  Sarah Theiss,et al.  Elastic Lidar Theory Practice And Analysis Methods , 2016 .

[72]  Alexander Haefele,et al.  An empirical method to correct for temperature-dependent variations in theoverlap function of CHM15k ceilometers , 2016 .

[73]  S. Basart,et al.  Desert dust contribution to PM10 loads in Italy: Methods and recommendations addressing the relevant European Commission Guidelines in support to the Air Quality Directive 2008/50 , 2017 .

[74]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Helicopter-borne observations of the continental background aerosol in combination with remote sensing and ground-based measurements , 2017 .

[75]  Michael J. Garay,et al.  Attributing Accelerated Summertime Warming in the Southeast United States to Recent Reductions in Aerosol Burden: Indications from Vertically-Resolved Observations , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[76]  Simone Lolli,et al.  Intercomparison of aerosol measurements performed with multi-wavelength Raman lidars, automatic lidars and ceilometers in the framework of INTERACT-II campaign , 2017 .

[77]  Vertical distribution of aerosol optical properties in the Po Valley during the 2012 summer campaigns , 2017 .

[78]  Victoria E. Cachorro,et al.  Near-real-time processing of a ceilometer network assisted with sun-photometer data: monitoring a dust outbreak over the Iberian Peninsula , 2017 .

[79]  V. Cachorro,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol profiles combining sunphotometer and ceilometer measurements in GRASP code , 2018 .

[80]  M. Hervo,et al.  Transport of Po Valley aerosol pollution to the northwestern Alps. Part 1: phenomenology , 2018 .

[81]  R. Engelmann,et al.  Vertical profiles of aerosol mass concentration derived by unmanned airborne in situ and remote sensing instruments during dust events , 2018 .

[82]  Yu Gu,et al.  Impact of varying lidar measurement and data processing techniques in evaluating cirrus cloud and aerosol direct radiative effects , 2018 .

[83]  F. Costabile,et al.  An inclusive view of Saharan dust advections to Italy and the Central Mediterranean , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.

[84]  G. Gobbi,et al.  Transport of Po Valley aerosol pollution to the northwestern Alps – Part 2: Long-term impact on air quality , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.