The effectiveness of a lumbopelvic monitor and feedback device to change postural behavior: a feasibility randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN Feasibility randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility of a trial to investigate the effectiveness of a lumbopelvic monitor as a feedback device for modifying postural behavior during daily work-related activities. BACKGROUND Frequent or sustained flexed postures play a role in the development or maintenance of nonspecific low back pain. The provision of postural feedback could help individuals with or at risk of nonspecific low back pain improve their postural awareness and avoid hazardous or pain-provoking postures. METHODS Sixty-two participants employed in a health care organization were randomly allocated into 1 of 3 groups: a control group, an intermittent feedback group, and a constant feedback group. Adherence and follow-up rates were assessed. Differences in postural pattern between baseline and follow-up measurements were used to assess the effectiveness of the lumbopelvic monitor as a postural feedback device. RESULTS Adherence was approximately 75%. With the exception of 1 center, the follow-up overall rates exceeded the a priori desired threshold of 80%. Within-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in postural pattern for the control group and intermittent feedback group. The constant feedback group showed a significant reduction in flexed posture at the follow-up period compared with the baseline period. Differences between groups did not reach statistical significance; however, the constant feedback group, compared with the control group, demonstrated an effect size (d) of 0.60. CONCLUSION The provision of constant postural feedback seems promising for promoting changes in postural behavior. This feasibility trial identified adherence and follow-up rates and sample-size estimates important to the conduct of a fully powered efficacy trial. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 2b-.

[1]  S. Milosavljevic,et al.  Dose-response relationship between work-related cumulative postural exposure and low back pain: a systematic review. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[2]  S. Milosavljevic,et al.  Extrinsic feedback and management of low back pain: A critical review of the literature. , 2011, Manual therapy.

[3]  B. Aust,et al.  Do psychosocial work environment factors measured with scales from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire predict register-based sickness absence of 3 weeks or more in Denmark? , 2010, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[4]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  Tore J Larsson,et al.  Frequent bending--an underestimated burden in nursing professions. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  S. Gallagher,et al.  Torso Flexion Loads and the Fatigue Failure of Human Lumbosacral Motion Segments , 2005, Spine.

[7]  Wai-Yin Wong,et al.  Trunk posture monitoring with inertial sensors , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[8]  Simon Dagenais,et al.  Causal assessment of occupational bending or twisting and low back pain: results of a systematic review. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Statistical power and measurement allocation in ergonomic intervention studies assessing upper trapezius EMG amplitude. A case study of assembly work. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[10]  William S Marras,et al.  The influence of individual low back health status on workplace trunk kinematics and risk of low back disorder , 2004, Ergonomics.

[11]  T. Beach,et al.  The time-varying response of the in vivo lumbar spine to dynamic repetitive flexion. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  Stephan Milosavljevic,et al.  Utility of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer in free living: an investigation of adherence and data loss. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Tore J Larsson,et al.  Measurement of stressful postures during daily activities: An observational study with older people. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[14]  Rolf Ellegast,et al.  Quantitative measurement of stressful trunk postures in nursing professions. , 2007, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  William S Marras,et al.  Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Kay Teschke,et al.  Measuring posture for epidemiology: Comparing inclinometry, observations and self-reports , 2009, Ergonomics.

[17]  A K Burton,et al.  Continuous measurement of lumbar posture using flexible electrogoniometers. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[18]  Stephan Milosavljevic,et al.  Cumulative postural exposure measured by a novel device: a preliminary study , 2011, Ergonomics.

[19]  P Cordo,et al.  The Role of Paraspinal Muscle Spindles in Lumbosacral Position Sense in Individuals With and Without Low Back Pain , 2000, Spine.

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury , 1993, Spine.

[22]  L Punnett,et al.  PATH: a work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  S. Jamieson Likert scales: how to (ab)use them , 2004, Medical education.

[24]  S. Sahrmann Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes , 2001 .

[25]  Gary A. Mirka,et al.  Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics , 1992 .

[26]  Steven A Lavender,et al.  Instrumentation for measuring dynamic spinal load moment exposures in the workplace. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[27]  G. Norman Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[28]  Paul W. Hodges,et al.  Changes in motor planning of feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles in low back pain , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  The ability of limited exposure sampling to detect effects of interventions that reduce the occurrence of pronounced trunk inclination. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[30]  Godfrey Pell,et al.  Use and misuse of Likert scales , 2005, Medical education.

[31]  Gwanseob Shin,et al.  An in vivo assessment of the low back response to prolonged flexion: Interplay between active and passive tissues. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[32]  Stuart W. G. Derbyshire The Biopsychosocial Model , 2005 .

[33]  J. Bjorner,et al.  Evaluating construct validity of the second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire through analysis of differential item functioning and differential item effect , 2010, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[34]  R. Magill Motor learning and control : concepts and applications , 2004 .

[35]  Belinda Barton,et al.  Medical Statistics: A Guide to SPSS, Data Analysis and Critical Appraisal , 2005 .

[36]  S. Milosavljevic,et al.  A rationale for the provision of extrinsic feedback towards management of low back pain. , 2011, Manual therapy.

[37]  D. Altman,et al.  Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  J. Fairbank The use of revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. , 2000, Spine.

[39]  L. Punnett,et al.  Physical and psychosocial ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in automobile manufacturing workers , 2011, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[40]  Gordon Waddell,et al.  The Back Pain Revolution , 1998 .

[41]  P M Bongers,et al.  Sources of variance in exposure to nonneutral trunk postures in varying work situations. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[42]  Jakob B. Bjorner,et al.  The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire , 2010, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[43]  W S Marras,et al.  Measuring trunk motions in industry: variability due to task factors, individual differences, and the amount of data collected , 2000, Ergonomics.

[44]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[45]  W Gary Allread,et al.  Biomechanical, psychosocial and individual risk factors predicting low back functional impairment among furniture distribution employees. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[46]  Peter J Keir,et al.  Continuous assessment of work activities and posture in long-term care nurses , 2010, Ergonomics.

[47]  A Spaepen,et al.  Lumbosacral repositioning accuracy in standing posture: a combined electrogoniometric and videographic evaluation. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[48]  Stephan Milosavljevic,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Spineangel® lumbo-pelvic postural monitor , 2013, Ergonomics.

[49]  Susan Michie,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions , 2015 .

[50]  Masaya Hirashima,et al.  Intermittent Visual Feedback Can Boost Motor Learning of Rhythmic Movements: Evidence for Error Feedback Beyond Cycles , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Susan Armijo-Olivo,et al.  Intention to treat analysis, compliance, drop-outs and how to deal with missing data in clinical research: a review , 2009 .

[52]  Jack P Callaghan,et al.  The role of dynamic flexion in spine injury is altered by increasing dynamic load magnitude. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[53]  A. Ismaila,et al.  A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how , 2010, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[54]  G. Hicks,et al.  Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Are Associated With Disability in Older American Adults With Low Back Pain , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[55]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[56]  H. Eriksen,et al.  European guidelines for prevention in low back pain , 2006 .

[57]  W S Marras,et al.  Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.