Planning for Community-based Evaluation

We present a planning guide that can be used to improve community-based evaluation. The planning guide consists of a set of questions that need to be discussed with all stakeholders. It covers issues relating to the nature and purpose of a community-based evaluation project, research methods and approaches, participation and decision-making, conflict and conflict resolution, and dissemination and use of results. The planning guide was developed through our experiences in an HIV/AIDS research and evaluation unit and a review of the literature. If community-based evaluators keep in mind the questions in this planning guide and discuss them early on with stakeholders, the evaluation process should benefit.

[1]  The landscape of values in evaluation: Charted terrain and unexplored territory , 1997 .

[2]  M. Hugentobler,et al.  Conducting Action Research: Relationships between Organization Members and Researchers , 1992 .

[3]  A. Wandersman,et al.  An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research , 1990 .

[4]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Environmental indicators: a tool for evaluating community-based health-promotion programs. , 1992, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  Robert Sommer,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Action Research Approach , 1987 .

[6]  Sharon F. Rallis,et al.  The relationship between the qualitative and quantitative research traditions , 1994 .

[7]  D. Fetterman.  Empowerment Evaluation and Accreditation in Higher Education , 1997 .

[8]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Advances in mixed-method evaluation : the challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms , 1997 .

[9]  Lois-ellin Datta,et al.  A pragmatic basis for mixed‐method designs , 1997 .

[10]  The political environment of evaluation and what it means for the development of the field , 1995 .

[11]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed‐method evaluation , 1997 .

[12]  Donna M. Mertens,et al.  Inclusive Evaluation: Implications of Transformative Theory for Evaluation , 1999 .

[13]  C. Achilles,et al.  Evaluation: A Systematic Approach , 1980 .

[14]  J. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design , 1998 .

[15]  Emil J. Posavac,et al.  Program Evaluation: Methods and Case Studies , 1980 .

[16]  M. Mellor.  Ethics and Accountability: Participatory Research in a Worker Co-Operative. , 1988 .

[17]  Toby Diane Ayers,et al.  Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A stakeholder-collaborative approach☆☆☆ , 1987 .

[18]  Connie Schnoes,et al.  Empowerment Evaluation Applied: Experiences, Analysis, and Recommendations from a Case Study , 2000 .