Bayesian Unsupervised Machine Learning Approach to Segment Arctic Sea Ice Using SMOS Data

Global warming effects are amplified in the Arctic, and sea ice has been declining with the annual minimum for September 2020 ending up being the second lowest in the 42-year satellite record (NSIDC, 2020). Sea ice governs heat transfer and influences atmospheric circulation, which is particularly important because lowand mid-latitude’s climates are closely related to polar climate (Francis & Vavrus, 2012; Overland & Wang, 2010). Monitoring of both sea ice concentration (SIC), as the fraction of sea-ice cover within an observed cell, and sea ice thickness (SIT), are necessary for a consistent determination of sea ice dynamics. Microwave radiometry is independent of daylight and at lower microwave frequency it is mostly unaffected by atmospheric conditions. The emissivity in the microwave spectrum depends on the dielectric properties of sea ice, which are a function of its physical composition including salinity, density, surface temperature, and surface roughness. The collected signal is emitted from a radiating layer which depends on the penetration depth at sensor frequency. A snow layer on top of sea ice influences the radiative properties of sea ice and the energy received by the sensor. The contribution of snow to the emitted signal is less in the lower microwave spectrum, and the separability of surface properties, such as open water and sea ice including SIT, is–in theory–feasible. Abstract Microwave radiometry at L-band is sensitive to sea ice thickness (SIT) up to ∼ 60 cm. Current methods to infer SIT depend on ice-physical properties and data provided by the ESA’s Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission. However, retrieval accuracy is limited due to seasonally and regionally variable surface conditions during the formation and melting of sea ice. In this work, Arctic sea ice is segmented using a Bayesian unsupervised learning algorithm aiming to recognize spatial patterns by harnessing multi-incidence angle brightness temperature observations. The approach considers both statistical characteristics and spatial correlations of the observations. The temporal stability and separability of classes are analyzed to distinguish ambiguous from well-determined regions. Model uncertainty is quantified from class membership probabilities using information entropy. The presented approach opens up a new scope to improve current SIT retrieval algorithms, and can be particularly beneficial to investigate merged satellite products.

[1]  Donald J. Cavalieri,et al.  Arctic sea ice extents, areas, and trends, 1978-1996 , 1999 .

[2]  J. Wellmann,et al.  Uncertainties have a meaning: Information entropy as a quality measure for 3-D geological models , 2012 .

[3]  Jacob Benesty,et al.  Pearson Correlation Coefficient , 2009 .

[4]  Niels Skou,et al.  SMOS sea ice product: operational application and validation in the Barents Sea marginal ice zone , 2016 .

[5]  Yann Kerr,et al.  The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements ofthe Global Water Cycle , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  J. Greene Feature subset selection using Thornton ’ s separabil ity index and its applicabil ity to a number of sparse proximity-based classifiers , 2001 .

[7]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  SMOS-derived thin sea ice thickness: algorithm baseline, product specifications and initial verification , 2013 .

[8]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  A. Turiel,et al.  On the retrieval of sea-ice thickness using SMOS polarization differences , 2019, Journal of Glaciology.

[10]  Manuel Martín-Neira,et al.  MIRAS end-to-end calibration: application to SMOS L1 processor , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Jon Louis Bentley,et al.  Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching , 1975, CACM.

[12]  Yann Kerr,et al.  SMOS: The Challenging Sea Surface Salinity Measurement From Space , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Hui Wang,et al.  A Segmentation Approach for Stochastic Geological Modeling Using Hidden Markov Random Fields , 2017, Mathematical Geosciences.

[14]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Empirical sea ice thickness retrieval during the freeze-up period from SMOS high incident angle observations , 2013 .

[15]  Muyin Wang,et al.  Large-scale atmospheric circulation changes are associated with the recent loss of Arctic sea ice , 2010 .

[16]  S. Vavrus,et al.  Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid‐latitudes , 2012 .

[17]  Calvin T. Swift,et al.  Low‐frequency passive‐microwave observations of sea ice in the Weddell Sea , 1993 .

[18]  J. Comiso,et al.  Trends in the sea ice cover using enhanced and compatible AMSR‐E, SSM/I, and SMMR data , 2008 .

[19]  P. Mahalanobis On the generalized distance in statistics , 1936 .

[20]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[21]  Luca Caricchi,et al.  EGU general Assembly , 2007 .

[22]  S. Kern,et al.  Version 2 of the EUMETSAT OSI SAF and ESA CCI sea-ice concentration climate data records , 2018, The Cryosphere.

[23]  Tshilidzi Marwala,et al.  A note on the separability index , 2008 .

[24]  Lars Kaleschke,et al.  A weekly Arctic sea-ice thickness data record from merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS satellite data , 2017 .

[25]  C. Hebel,et al.  Pattern Extraction of Topsoil and Subsoil Heterogeneity and Soil‐Crop Interaction Using Unsupervised Bayesian Machine Learning: An Application to Satellite‐Derived NDVI Time Series and Electromagnetic Induction Measurements , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[26]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .