The Chinese scientific publication system: Specific features, specific challenges

By introducing new policy initiatives, China is trying to change the evaluation of scientific research, shifting the focus from counting publication output to stressing high‐quality research, with the objective of achieving excellent science. Against this background, the scientific publication system itself is important for safeguarding high‐quality publications and high‐quality journals. However, the Chinese scientific publication system has some specificities and unique features, which also create particular challenges. This article describes the scientific publication system in China. It covers the Chinese ex‐ante journal licensing examination, the triple ownership management structure and provides an overview of the editorial process of Chinese scientific journals. It analyses how difficulties in the Chinese scientific publication system relate to concerns over research quality and integrity. We conclude with an agenda of the crucial issues facing the current Chinese attempts to promote quality in scientific publications.

[1]  Fang Qing,et al.  Peer-Review Practice and Research for Academic Journals in China , 2008 .

[2]  Jie Xu,et al.  The scholarly publishing industry in China: overview and opportunities , 2012, Learn. Publ..

[3]  Jie Xu,et al.  Internationalization of China's English‐language academic journals: An overview and three approaches , 2018, Learn. Publ..

[4]  Jeff Tollefson,et al.  China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles , 2018, Nature.

[5]  Xiangyi Zhang,et al.  Effect of reviewer's origin on peer review: China vs. non‐China , 2012, Learn. Publ..

[6]  R. Freeman,et al.  Bigger than You Thought: China's Contribution to Scientific Publications and its Impact on the Global Economy , 2019, China & World Economy.

[7]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016) , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[8]  Xiao-Jun He,et al.  Chinese scientific journals: how they can survive , 2012, Learn. Publ..

[10]  M. Hvistendahl.  China's publication bazaar. , 2013, Science.

[11]  Songqing Lin,et al.  Trash journals in China , 2014, Learn. Publ..

[12]  Songqing Lin,et al.  International publishing partnerships for China's English language journals and financial security , 2016, Learn. Publ..

[13]  S. Haustein,et al.  The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  Yufei Jiang,et al.  An international peer-review system for a Chinese scientific journal , 2003, Learn. Publ..

[16]  Tao Wang,et al.  Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China , 2017, Scientometrics.

[17]  Songqing Lin.  How the approval system affects Chinese scientific journals , 2013, Learn. Publ..

[18]  Alejandro Posada,et al.  Inequality in Knowledge Production: The Integration of Academic Infrastructure by Big Publishers , 2018, 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing.

[19]  S. P. J. M. Horbach,et al.  The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications , 2018, Scientometrics.

[20]  Songqing Lin,et al.  Why serious academic fraud occurs in China , 2013, Learn. Publ..

[21]  S. Horbach,et al.  Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? , 2019, Minerva.

[22]  J. Qiu.  Safeguarding research integrity in China , 2015 .

[23]  S. Horbach,et al.  The changing forms and expectations of peer review , 2018, Research Integrity and Peer Review.