Increased understanding of hybrid vehicle design through modeling, simulation, and optimization

Vehicle design is constantly changing and improving due to the technologically driven nature of the automotive industry, particularly in the hybridization and electrification of vehicle drivetrains. Through enhanced design vehicle level design constraints can result in the fulfillment of system level design objectives. These constraints may include improved vehicle fuel economy, all electric range, and component costs which can affect system objectives of increased national energy independence, reduced vehicle and societal emissions, and reduced life-cycle costs. In parallel, as computational power increases the ability to accurately represent systems through analytical models improves. This allows for systems engineering which is commonly quicker and less resource consuming than physical testing. As a systems engineering technique, optimization has shown to obtain superior solutions systematically, in opposition to trial-and-error designs of the past. Through the combination of vehicle models, computer numerical simulation, and optimization, overall vehicle systems design can greatly improve. This study defines a connection between the system level objectives for advanced vehicle design and the component-and vehicle-level design process using a multi-level design and simulation modeling environment. The methods and information pathways for vehicle system models are presented and applied to dynamic simulation. Differing vehicle architecture simulations are subjected to a selection of proven optimization algorithms and design objectives iii such that the performance of the algorithms and vehicle-specific design information and sensitivity is obtained. The necessity of global search optimization and aggregate objective functions are confirmed through exploration of the complex hybrid vehicle design space. Whether the chosen design space is limited to available components or expanded to academic areas, studies can be performed for numerous design objectives and constraints. The combination of design criteria into quantifiable objective functions allows for direct optimization comparison based on any number of design goals. Integrating well-defined objective functions into high performing global optimization search methods provides increased probability of obtaining solutions which represent the most germane designs. Additionally, key interactions between different components in the vehicular system can easily be identified such that ideal directions for gain relative to minimal cost can be achieved. Often times vehicular design processes require lower order representations or consist of time and resource consuming iterations. Through the formulation presented in this study, more details, objectives, and methods become available for comparing advanced vehicles across architectures. The main techniques used for setting up the models, simulations and optimizations are discussed along with results of test runs based on chosen …

[1]  Alexander Kossiakoff,et al.  Systems engineering : principles and practices , 2003 .

[2]  Yangsheng Xu,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization for Operational Parameters of Series Hybrid Electric Vehicle , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[3]  F. Stermole,et al.  Economic evaluation and investment decision methods , 1977 .

[4]  J. Pukrushpan Modeling and control of fuel cell systems and fuel processors , 2003 .

[5]  Johanna Wallén Modelling of Components for Conventional Car and Hybrid Electric Vehicle in Modelica , 2004 .

[6]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Optimal design of automotive hybrid powertrain systems , 1999, Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[7]  Andrew A. Frank,et al.  MEETING BOTH ZEV AND PNGV GOALS WITH A HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE : AN EXPLORATION , 1996 .

[8]  Anders Fröberg,et al.  Extending the inverse vehicle propulsion simulation concept - to improve simulation performance , 2005 .

[9]  B. Eng,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[10]  W. Gao,et al.  Design optimization of a parallel hybrid electric powertrain , 2005, 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[11]  Adrian Pop,et al.  The OpenModelica Modeling, Simulation, and Development Environment , 2005 .

[12]  Ali Emadi,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  The Validation Square: How Does One Verify and Validate a Design Method? , 2006 .

[14]  Huei Peng,et al.  Modeling and Control of a Power-Split Hybrid Vehicle , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[15]  Jeffrey Daniel Wishart,et al.  Modelling, simulation, testing, and optimization of advanced hybrid vehicle powertrains , 2008 .

[16]  Chris Mi,et al.  Hybrid Vehicle Design Using Global Optimisation Algorithms , 2007 .

[17]  Shi-Yin Qin,et al.  Concurrent Optimization for Parameters of Powertrain and Control System of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Based on Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms , 2006, 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference.

[18]  Chris Mi,et al.  Performance Modeling and Optimization of a Novel Multi-mode Hybrid Powertrain , 2006 .

[19]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of the Toyota Hybrid System , 2005 .

[20]  Mehrdad Ehsani,et al.  Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Architecture and Motor Drives , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  Sam Golbuff Cost Optimization of a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle , 2008 .

[22]  Richard Barney Carlson,et al.  Calculating Results and Performance Parameters for PHEVs , 2009 .

[23]  K. T. Chau,et al.  Battery Sizing for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2006 .

[24]  Yolanda Carson,et al.  Simulation optimization: methods and applications , 1997, WSC '97.

[25]  H. Banks Center for Research in Scientific Computationにおける研究活動 , 1999 .

[26]  D. Finkel,et al.  Direct optimization algorithm user guide , 2003 .

[27]  Achille Messac,et al.  From Dubious Construction of Objective Functions to the Application of Physical Programming , 2000 .

[28]  Hubertus Tummescheit,et al.  Design and Implementation of Object-Oriented Model Libraries using Modelica , 2002 .

[29]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2009 .

[30]  Kenneth Holmström,et al.  Global Optimization Using the DIRECT Algorithm in Matlab , 1999 .