Case Research in Global Software Projects: Coordinating Through Knowledge

This paper brings together two challenging areas for both information systems (IS) research and practice: forms of coordination, and the efficacy of global, virtual software development projects. The contribution of the present paper is to develop a more comprehensive, knowledge-based model of how coordination can be achieved, and to illustrate the heuristic and explanatory power of the model when applied to global software projects experiencing different degrees of success. We first detail the literature on coordination, and show also what is known about coordination experiences in global software projects. We then develop, through a literature critique, a new, distinctive knowledge-based model of coordination. This is then employed to analyze two case studies of global software projects, at SAP and Baan, which illustrate the utility of the model. Finally, the paper discusses implications of the findings for future IS research.

[1]  NidumoluSarma The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance , 1995 .

[2]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Globalization by Chunking: A Quantitative Approach , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[3]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes , 1993, [1993] Proceedings Second Workshop on Enabling Technologies@m_Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[5]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[6]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  DEVELOPMENTS OF TRANSACTIVE MEMORY SYSTEMS AND COLLECTIVE MIND IN VIRTUAL TEAMS , 2001 .

[7]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[10]  B. Pentland Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1993 .

[11]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[12]  P. C. vanFenema Coordination and Control of Globally Distributed Software Projects , 2002 .

[13]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[14]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones , 1999 .

[15]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[16]  R. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and the firm: Overview , 1996 .

[17]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[18]  Li-Te Cheng,et al.  Building Collaboration into IDEs , 2003, ACM Queue.

[19]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes , 1999 .

[20]  Leigh Weiss,et al.  Coordination Networks within and Across Organizations: A Multi-Level Framework , 2004 .

[21]  Ilan Oshri,et al.  Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[23]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[24]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[25]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[26]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[27]  A. Donnellon,et al.  Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. , 1986 .

[28]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[29]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[31]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[32]  K. Subramanian,et al.  Leveraging Resources in Global Software Development , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[33]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[34]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[35]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[36]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[37]  A. Young Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[38]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[39]  Laurie L. Levesque,et al.  Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams , 2001 .

[40]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[41]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Intense Collaboration In Globally Distributed Teams: Evolving Patterns Of Dependencies And Coordination , 2004 .

[42]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness , 1990 .

[43]  J. Gabarro The development of working relationships , 1990 .

[44]  WalshamGeoff Cross-cultural software production and use , 2002 .

[45]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[46]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design , 1997 .

[47]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  From experience: leading dispersed teams , 2002 .

[48]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Culture Surprises in Remote Software Development Teams , 2003, ACM Queue.

[49]  David Bawden,et al.  Review: Groupware and teamwork. Invisible aid or technical hindrance , 1997 .

[50]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[51]  Christof Ebert,et al.  Surviving Global Software Development , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[52]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Groupware and teamwork: invisible aid or technical hindrance? , 1997 .

[53]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[54]  Sarma R. Nidumolu A Comparison of the Structural Contingency and Risk-Based Perspectives on Coordination in Software Development Projects , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[56]  R. Moreland Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .