Cerebral cortical somatosensory evoked responses, multiple unit activity and current source-densities: their interrelationships and significance to somatic sensation as revealed by stimulation of the awake monkey's hand

SummaryIn awake monkeys, electrical pulse stimuli which mimic touch stimulation were delivered to the thenar eminence while electrophysiologic recordings were made from surface to depth in postcentral gyrus. Cortical depth profiles of somatosensory evoked responses (SEPs), multiple unit activity (MUA) and current source-densities (CSDs) were analyzed to gain insight into the neural process underlying the SEP and somatic sensation. The following was found: 1.) The thenar stimulus evoked four main SEP components which were seen over wide regions of postcentral gyrus: P1 at 12 ms, the primary evoked response; P1a, near 20 ms; N1, near 50 ms; and P2, around 120 ms after the stimulus. 2.) MUA was observed during the P1, P1a and N1 temporal intervals whose vigor changed as a function of the respective SEP component's amplitude. 3.) CSD analysis showed that during P1 a current sink and source appeared within the the middle and superficial cortical layers, respectively. During P1a, a sink just above that of P1 and a superficial source became evident. During N1, a large superficial sink and one or two deep sources appeared. Evoked MUA during P1 and P1a was most prominent at the level of their current sinks while MUA during N1 appeared at the level of the current sources, in general. 4.) When stimulation was moved from the thenar portion of the hand to a region which most closely matched the receptive field of the cortical recording site, P1 and P1a increased amplitude while N1 both increased in amplitude and decreased in peak latency. Also, MUA activity during the early temporal intervals become more vigorous. These changes were similar to those observed with thenar stimuli as the recording site approached the thenar cortical representation. 5.) Over repeated trials at a single stimulus intensity, the spontaneous changes in SEP amplitude were found to be directly correlated with MUA and CSD measures within the same temporal interval. In contrast, SEP, MUA or CSD measures within the early temporal intervals (i.e., P1 or P1a) were uncorrelated or less frequently, inversely correlated with the same measures in the late temporal interval (i.e. N1). The multiple measures complemented one another which led to a descriptive model of the neural process underlying the evoked cortical response in postcentral gyrus of awake monkey.

[1]  Herbert G. Vaughan,et al.  THE NEURAL ORIGINS OF HUMAN EVENT‐RELATED POTENTIALS * , 1980 .

[2]  J. Eccles.  The modular operation of the cerebral neocortex considered as the material basis of mental events , 1981, Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Semmes.  Somesthetic Effects of Damage to the Central Nervous System , 1973 .

[4]  W. Spencer,et al.  Cutaneous masking. II. Geometry of excitatory andinhibitory receptive fields of single units in somatosensory cortex of the cat. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  E P Gardner,et al.  Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and cortical single unit responses elicited by mechanical tactile stimuli in awake monkeys. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Eccles.  The Cerebral Neocortex , 1984 .

[7]  W. Penfield,et al.  The Cerebral Cortex of Man: A Clinical Study of Localization of Function , 1968 .

[8]  K. Carlson.  A temporary restraint chair for monkeys. , 1972, Physiology & behavior.

[9]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  J. Eccles,et al.  Interpretation of action potentials evoked in the cerebral cortex. , 1951, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Szentágothai.  The Ferrier Lecture, 1977 The neuron network of the cerebral cortex: a functional interpretation , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  U. Norrsell.  Behavioral studies of the somatosensory system. , 1980, Physiological reviews.

[13]  K. Zilles.  The parietal cortex of monkey and man , 1984 .

[14]  B Milner,et al.  Somatosensory thresholds--contrasting effects of postcentral-gyrus and posterior parietal-lobe excisions. , 1970, Archives of neurology.

[15]  H Petsche,et al.  A 16-fold semi-microelectrode for intracortical recording of field potentials. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  J Arezzo,et al.  Topography and intracranial sources of somatosensory evoked potentials in the monkey. I. Early components. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Sur,et al.  Representations of the body surface in postcentral parietal cortex of Macaca fascicularis , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  Neurophysiological correlates of sensory discrimination performance to electrical cutaneous stimuli in rhesus monkey , 1977, Brain Research.

[19]  W. Uttal.  The Psychobiology of Sensory Coding , 2014 .

[20]  A. T. Kulics,et al.  Cortical neural evoked correlates of somatosensory stimulus detection in the rhesus monkey. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  P. Rappelsberger,et al.  Current source density analysis: Methods and application to simultaneously recorded field potentials of the rabbit's visual cortex , 2004, Pflügers Archiv.

[22]  H. Vaughan,et al.  Topography and intracranial sources of somatosensory evoked potentials in the monkey. II. Cortical components. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Lineberry,et al.  The effects of diazepam, morphine and lidocaine on nociception in rhesus monkeys: a signal detection analysis. , 1978, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[24]  E P Gardner,et al.  Spatial integration of multiple-point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. , 1980, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Hallin,et al.  Do large diameter cutaneous afferents have a role in the transmission of nociceptive messages? , 1984, Brain Research.

[26]  F. J. Clark,et al.  Microstimulation of single tactile afferents from the human hand. Sensory attributes related to unit type and properties of receptive fields. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  F. Bremer.  Inhibitions intrathalamiques récurrentielles et physiologie du sommeil , 1970 .

[28]  M. Kuperstein,et al.  A Practical 24 Channel Microelectrode for Neural Recording in Vivo , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  U. Mitzdorf.  Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. , 1985, Physiological reviews.

[30]  O. L. Zangwill,et al.  Somatosensory Changes after Penetrating Brain Wounds in Man , 1960 .

[31]  E P Gardner,et al.  Temporal integration of multiple-point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Anterior parietal cortical topographic organization in macaque monkey: a reevaluation. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  C. Woolsey,et al.  Study of the postcentral gyrus of man by the evoked potential technique. , 1950, Transactions of the American Neurological Association.

[34]  H. Vaughan,et al.  A new multielectrode array for the simultaneous recording of field potentials and unit activity. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  ROBERT H. GIBSON,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of Pain and Touch Systems , 1963, Nature.

[36]  J. Szentágothai.  The ‘module-concept’ in cerebral cortex architecture , 1975, Brain Research.

[37]  Clifford D. Ferris,et al.  Introduction to Bioelectrodes , 1974 .

[38]  L. Cauller,et al.  Discrete sampling of continuous biological signals: Analog-to-digital conversion , 1983, Brain Research Bulletin.

[39]  J. Kaas,et al.  What, if anything, is SI? Organization of first somatosensory area of cortex. , 1983, Physiological reviews.

[40]  SENSORY DISCRIMINABILITY COMPARISONS IN HUMAN AND MONKEY WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF CENTRAL NERVOUS CORRELATES * , 1977, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  B. Libet,et al.  Responses of Human Somatosensory Cortex to Stimuli below Threshold for Conscious Sensation , 1967, Science.

[42]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Converging patterns of finger representation and complex response properties of neurons in area 1 of the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey , 1983, Experimental Brain Research.