The fine microstructure of knowledge creation dynamics: reporting further advances

This paper presents a new framework for modeling the fine microstructure of knowledge creation dynamics. Our focus is on the creation of working knowledge used in innovation, for example, the knowledge used by a researcher in the economics profession. The framework has been developed to address the following questions: What is the appropriate way to model the operational structure of working knowledge? How are specific new ideas, research papers, and patents created by a research worker or a group of them, based on the current stock of knowledge? What roles do dynamics, heterogeneity of ideas, heterogeneity of researchers, and cities or regions play? Using our framework, first we study how a researcher creates a new literature, choosing new assumptions, models, implications, and observations in each step. Next, we examine how two researchers interact in creating new complete literatures together. Finally, we discuss how to extend the analysis to N-person case in multiple cities or regions. In the last NARSA meetings in Atlanta, we presented preliminary results on the same topic. In this paper, we report further advances on modeling the fine microstructure of knowledge creation dynamics.

[1]  T. Rader,et al.  Nice demand functions - II , 1979 .

[2]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[3]  Robert M. Solow,et al.  LAND USE IN A LONG NARROW CITY , 1971 .

[4]  W. Branson Macroeconomic theory and policy , 1972 .

[5]  Edwin Burmeister,et al.  Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth , 1971 .

[6]  E. Domar,et al.  CAPITAL EXPANSION, RATE OF GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT , 1946 .

[7]  T. Swan,et al.  ECONOMIC GROWTH and CAPITAL ACCUMULATION , 1956 .

[8]  R. Harrod,et al.  AN ESSAY IN DYNAMIC THEORY , 1939 .

[9]  R. Rajendiran,et al.  Topological Spaces , 2019, A Physicist's Introduction to Algebraic Structures.

[10]  Christopher H. Bryant,et al.  Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist , 2004, Nature.

[11]  Hans Rott,et al.  Change, choice and inference - a study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning , 2001, Oxford logic guides.

[12]  Amanda Clare,et al.  An ontology for a Robot Scientist , 2006, ISMB.

[13]  R. Solow A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[14]  A. Turing On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. , 1937 .

[15]  R. Dimand,et al.  Trevor Swan and the Neoclassical Growth Model , 2008 .

[16]  Gary M. Hardegree,et al.  Algebraic Methods in Philosophical Logic , 2001 .

[17]  Bernhard Ganter,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations , 1998 .

[18]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[19]  Raymond C. Kurzweil,et al.  The Singularity Is Near , 2018, The Infinite Desire for Growth.

[20]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Reverse engineering and identification in systems biology: strategies, perspectives and challenges , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  Jon Barwise,et al.  Information Flow: Speech Acts , 1997 .