Large Scale Experimental Study of the Scour Protection Damage Around a Monopile Foundation Under Combined Wave and Current Conditions

This paper presents a series of large-scale wave flume experiments on the scour protection damage around a monopile under combined waves and current conditions with model scales of 1:16.67 and 1:8.33. The main objective is to compare the damage data obtained from these large-scale models with existing monopile scour protection design approaches, which were proposed based on small scale wave flume experiments, and to study the applicability of the existing approaches. The static stability (onset of motion and bed shear stress) and the dynamic stability (three-dimensional damage numbers) of the scour protection are investigated. Both results show that the existing design approaches can be conservative when applied to large scale models, which highlights the need of further investigations on scale and model effects. In addition, this paper also analyses the scour protection damage depth. It is observed that damage depths of the scour protection layer under low Keulegan–Carpenter number (KC) conditions are smaller than predictions. The study provides valuable large scale experimental data for future research on the monopile scour protection design.

[1]  J. Kamphuis.  Friction Factor under Oscillatory Waves , 1975 .

[2]  Anders Wedel Nielsen.  Scour Protection of Offshore Wind Farms , 2011 .

[3]  C. F. Colebrook,et al.  Experiments with Fluid Friction in Roughened Pipes , 1937 .

[4]  B. Mutlu Sumer,et al.  Sinking of armour layer around a vertical cylinder exposed to waves and current , 2015 .

[5]  A. Nielsen,et al.  Stability of cover stones around a vertical cylinder under the influence of waves and current , 2019 .

[6]  L. Neves,et al.  Reliability assessment of offshore dynamic scour protections using copulas , 2018, Wind Engineering.

[7]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  Backfilling of a Scour Hole around a Pile in Waves and Current , 2013 .

[8]  Leen De Vos.  Optimisation of scour protection design for monopiles and quantification of waver run-up , 2008 .

[9]  Tongguang Wang,et al.  Foundations of offshore wind turbines: A review , 2019, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[11]  Søren Peder Hyldal Sørensen,et al.  Assessment of foundation design for offshore monopiles unprotected against scour , 2013 .

[12]  J. Sutherland,et al.  Scale effects in the physical modelling of seabed scour , 1998 .

[13]  Bruce W. Melville,et al.  RIPRAP PROTECTION AT BRIDGE PIERS , 2001 .

[14]  Julien De Rouck,et al.  Empirical design of scour protections around monopile foundations , 2011 .

[15]  Jess McCann Thomsen,et al.  Experimental Study of the Development of Scour and Backfilling , 2010 .

[16]  Leen Baelus,et al.  Optimising scour protection stability at offshore foundations , 2014 .

[17]  R. Soulsby.  Dynamics of marine sands : a manual for practical applications , 1997 .

[18]  Robert Ettema,et al.  Clear‐Water Scour at Cylindrical Piers , 1983 .

[19]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  Hydrodynamics Around Cylindrical Structures , 2006 .

[20]  Richard Whitehouse,et al.  Scour at Marine Structures: A Manual for Practical Applications , 1998 .

[21]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  Edge scour at scour protections around piles in the marine environment - Laboratory and field investigation , 2015 .

[22]  B. Sumer,et al.  The mechanics of scour in the marine environment , 2002 .

[23]  Francisco Taveira-Pinto,et al.  Probabilistic design and reliability analysis of scour protections for offshore windfarms , 2018 .

[24]  Fu-Ping Gao,et al.  Physical modeling of local scour development around a large-diameter monopile in combined waves and current , 2014 .

[25]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  Wave boundary layer over a stone-covered bed , 2008 .

[26]  F. T. Pinto,et al.  Large-Scale Experiments to Improve Monopile Scour Protection Design Adapted to Climate Change—The PROTEUS Project , 2019, Energies.

[27]  G. Hoffmans,et al.  Scour Manual , 2021 .

[28]  Peter Frigaard,et al.  Empirical design of scour protections around monopile foundations. Part 2: Dynamic approach , 2012 .

[29]  Jørgen Fredsøe,et al.  Scour around Pile in Combined Waves and Current , 2001 .

[30]  R. Soulsby,et al.  Threshold of Sediment Motion in Coastal Environments , 1997 .

[31]  John M. Harris,et al.  The nature of scour development and scour protection at offshore windfarm foundations. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[32]  Yee-Meng Chiew,et al.  FAILURE BEHAVIOR OF RIPRAP LAYER AT BRIDGE PIERS UNDER LIVE-BED CONDITIONS , 2000 .

[33]  A. Shields,et al.  Anwendung der Aehnlichkeitsmechanik und der Turbulenzforschung auf die Geschiebebewegung , 1936 .

[34]  B. Sumer,et al.  Scour Around Vertical Pile in Waves , 1992 .

[35]  T. Schlurmann,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COARSE GRAIN MATERIALS AS SCOUR PROTECTION , 2014 .

[37]  Anders Wedel Nielsen,et al.  Sinking failure of scour protection at wind turbine foundation , 2013 .

[38]  Yee-Meng Chiew,et al.  MECHANICS OF RIPRAP FAILURE AT BRIDGE PIERS , 1995 .

[39]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Feasibility of a Dynamically Stable Rock Armour Layer Scour Protection for Offshore Wind Farms , 2014 .

[40]  B. Mutlu Sumer,et al.  Scour around coastal structures: a summary of recent research $ , 2001 .