Research Methodology on Language Development from a Complex Systems Perspective

Changes to research methodology motivated by the adoption of a complexity theory perspective on language development are considered. The dynamic, nonlinear, and open nature of complex systems, together with their tendency toward self-organization and interaction across levels and timescales, requires changes in traditional views of the functions and roles of theory, hypothesis, data, and analysis. Traditional views of causality are shifted to focus on co-adaptation and emergence. Context is not seen as a backdrop, but rather as a complex system itself, connected to other complex systems, and variability in system behavior takes on increased importance. A set of general methodological principles is offered, and an overview of specific methods is given, with particular attention to validity in simulation modeling.

[1]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  Classroom Talks: An Introduction , 2004 .

[2]  L. Cameron.  Metaphor in Educational Discourse , 2003 .

[3]  J. Lantolf.  Language Emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics—A Sociocultural Perspective , 2006 .

[4]  E. Thelen,et al.  Microdevelopment: Microdevelopment and dynamic systems: Applications to infant motor development , 2002 .

[5]  L. Cameron,et al.  Metaphor clusters in discourse , 2007 .

[6]  David Byrne,et al.  Interpreting Quantitative Data , 2002 .

[7]  Dwight Atkinson,et al.  Ethnographic approaches and methods in L2 writing research: a critical guide and review , 1999 .

[8]  Wolfgang Klein,et al.  Frame of analysis , 1995 .

[9]  B. Hannover,et al.  Culture, context, and cognition: The Semantic Procedural Interface model of the self , 2004 .

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[11]  Margaret Thomas,et al.  The Child Language Data Exchange System in research on second language acquisition , 2001 .

[12]  John H. Holland,et al.  Language Origin from an Emergentist Perspective. , 2006 .

[13]  Joanne Lobato,et al.  How Design Experiments Can Inform a Rethinking of Transfer andViceVersa , 2003 .

[14]  K. Fischer,et al.  Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. , 1998 .

[15]  Claire J. Kramsch.  Language acquisition and language socialization : ecological perspectives , 2002 .

[16]  C Snow,et al.  Child language data exchange system , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[17]  L. Cameron,et al.  The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse. , 2006 .

[18]  Geoffrey L. Hammond.  Foreward , 2010, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[19]  Alice Deignan,et al.  Combining Large and Small Corpora to Investigate Tuning Devices Around Metaphor in Spoken Discourse , 2003 .

[20]  Lourdes Ortega,et al.  LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: RECENT TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2005, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[21]  A. Holliday.  Developing a Sociological Imagination: Expanding Ethnography in International English Language Education , 1996 .

[22]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  Chaos/Complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition , 1997 .

[24]  J. Gaddis..  Landscape History , 2012 .

[25]  Stephen Reder,et al.  The Multimedia Adult ESL Learner Corpus , 2003 .

[26]  Luc Steels.  A self-organizing spatial vocabulary , 1995 .

[27]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[28]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Design-Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for the Learning Scientist. , 2006 .

[29]  Christopher Cieri,et al.  Talkbank: Building an Open Unified Multimodal Database of Communicative Interaction , 2004, LREC.

[30]  Florence Myles,et al.  Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research , 2005 .

[31]  Dwight Atkinson.  Toward a sociocognitive approach to second Llanguage acquisition , 2002 .

[32]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Development and Evolution. , 1903 .

[33]  C. Campbell,et al.  On Being There , 1965 .

[34]  J. Lantolf.  Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning: Introduction to the Special Issue , 1994 .

[35]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Language as a dynamical system , 1996 .

[36]  Paul Meara,et al.  Emergent Properties of Multilingual Lexicons , 2006 .

[37]  J. Dean Mellow,et al.  The Emergence of Second Language Syntax: A Case Study of the Acquisition of Relative Clauses , 2006 .

[38]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  The emergence of communication in evolutionary robots , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[39]  D. Larsen-Freeman,et al.  Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics , 2008 .

[40]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulation for the social scientist , 1999 .

[41]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning , 2004 .

[42]  Diane Larsen-Freeman.  6. Functional grammar: On the value and limitations of dependability, inference, and generalizability , 2006 .

[43]  Henderien Steenbeek,et al.  A complexity and dynamic systems approach to developmental assessment, modeling and research , 2008 .

[44]  L. Mondada,et al.  Second Language Acquisition as Situated Practice: Task Accomplishment in the French Second Language Classroom , 2005 .

[45]  Hansun Zhang Waring.  Peer Tutoring in a Graduate Writing Centre: Identity, Expertise, and Advice Resisting , 2005 .

[46]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[47]  Wander Lowie,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition , 2007, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[48]  Paul van Geert,et al.  The Dynamic Systems Approach in the Study of L1 and L2 Acquisition: An Introduction , 2008 .

[49]  Alison Sealey,et al.  Applied linguistics as social science , 2004 .

[50]  Raymond A. Eve,et al.  Chaos, complexity, and sociology : myths, models, and theories , 1998 .

[51]  J. H. Leather,et al.  Ecology of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[52]  David Reinking,et al.  A Formative Experiment Investigating the Use of Multimedia Book Reviews To Increase Elementary Students' Independent Reading. Reading Research Report No. 55. , 2000 .

[53]  Denis Newman.  Opportunities for Research on the Organizational Impact of School Computers , 1990 .

[54]  Michael Agar,et al.  We have met the other and we're all nonlinear: Ethnography as a nonlinear dynamic system , 2004, Complex..

[55]  de Cornelis Bot,et al.  Second language acquisition , 2005 .

[56]  Nelson Minar,et al.  The Swarm Simulation System: A Toolkit for Building Multi-Agent Simulations , 1996 .

[57]  Teresa Satterfield,et al.  Toward a Sociogenetic Solution , 2001 .

[58]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English , 2006 .

[59]  Marjolijn Verspoor,et al.  Variability in Second Language Development From a Dynamic Systems Perspective , 2008 .

[60]  Stanley N. Salthe,et al.  Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology , 1993 .

[61]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[62]  Srikant Sarangi,et al.  Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives , 2002 .

[63]  Paul van Geert,et al.  Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data , 2002 .