Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE

Encouraging students to be autonomous is an important goal of the scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Knowledge integration requires students to expand their repertoire of ideas but unless those ideas are reflected upon, they cannot be linked to and reconciled with current ideas. Students are capable of doing this kind of reflection but, many need scaffolding. Scaffolding here in the form of reflection prompts can help students be autonomous integrators of their knowledge. This research investigated learning and design questions. It determined whether reflection prompts promote knowledge integration for students working on science projects and investigated the effects of students' different dispositions on their reflection. It explored which characteristics of prompts best support students in knowledge integration. The learning results indicate that prompting students to reflect significantly increases knowledge integration in science projects. Yet similar prompts elicit qualitatively diverse responses from students. Students who focus on their ideas perform significantly better on the end product than do other students who focus on their actions or activities. Furthermore, students who indicate that they understand everything perform significantly worse on the final project than do other students. The design results show that self-monitoring prompts, which encourage planning for and reflection on activities, help students to demonstrate an integrated understanding of the relevant science; while activity prompts, which guide the inquiry process, are less successful in prompting knowledge integration.

[1]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment , 2000 .

[2]  William Y. Lan,et al.  The effects of self-monitoring on students' course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation , 1996 .

[3]  Philip Bell,et al.  The knowledge integration environment: theory and design , 1995, CSCL.

[4]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Training in Self-Explanation and Self-Regulation Strategies: Investigating the Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problem Solving , 1995 .

[5]  Sherry Hsiao-Rai Hsi Facilitating knowledge integration in science through electronic discussion: The Multimedia Forum Kiosk , 1997 .

[6]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[7]  M. Linn,et al.  Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? , 1991 .

[8]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Can Experts' Explanations Help Students Develop Program Design Skills? , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[9]  S. Stein What's All the Fuss About? , 1996 .

[10]  Linda Flower,et al.  The Dynamics of Composing : Making Plans and Juggling Constraints , 1980 .

[11]  N. Webb Predicting learning from student interaction: Defining the interaction variables , 1983 .

[12]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[13]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[14]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .

[15]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[16]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework , 1995 .

[18]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Peter Searle,et al.  Some long‐term effects of uninformed conceptual change , 1992 .

[20]  Elizabeth Anna Davis Scaffolding students' reflection for science learning , 1998 .