Effectiveness of Schema-Based Instruction for Improving Seventh-Grade Students’ Proportional Reasoning: A Randomized Experiment

Abstract This study examined the effect of schema-based instruction (SBI) on 7th-grade students’ mathematical problem-solving performance. SBI is an instructional intervention that emphasizes the role of mathematical structure in word problems and also provides students with a heuristic to self-monitor and aid problem solving. Using a pretest-intervention–posttest-retention test design, the study compared the learning outcomes for 1,163 students in 42 classrooms who were randomly assigned to treatment (SBI) or control condition. After 6 weeks of instruction, results of multilevel modeling indicated significant differences favoring the SBI condition in proportion problem solving involving ratios/rates and percents on an immediate posttest (g = 1.24) and on a 6-week retention test (g = 1.27). No significant difference between conditions was found for a test of transfer. These results demonstrate that SBI was more effective than students’ regular mathematics instruction.

[1]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities , 1998 .

[2]  Murat Akkuş.  The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics , 2015 .

[3]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Preventative Tutoring on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Third-Grade Students with Math and Reading Difficulties , 2008, Exceptional children.

[4]  M. Behr,et al.  Using Data Tables to Represent and Solve Multiplicative Story Problems. , 1991 .

[5]  Ellen F. Potter,et al.  How Students “Unpack” the Structure of a Word Problem: Graphic Representations and Problem Solving , 2008 .

[6]  Steven Pulos,et al.  Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature , 1985 .

[7]  G. Goldin.  Meta-Analysis of Problem-Solving Studies: A Critical Response , 1992 .

[8]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Remediating Number Combination and Word Problem Deficits Among Students With Mathematics Difficulties: A Randomized Control Trial. , 2009, Journal of educational psychology.

[9]  Robert Adjiage,et al.  An Experiment in Teaching Ratio and Proportion , 2007 .

[10]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. , 2007 .

[11]  Jon R. Star,et al.  Improving Students' Proportional Thinking Using Schema-Based Instruction , 2011 .

[12]  Jon R. Star,et al.  Improving Seventh Grade Students' Learning of Ratio and Proportion: The Role of Schema-Based Instruction. , 2009 .

[13]  C. Moore,et al.  Development of intuitive and numerical proportional reasoning , 1992 .

[14]  J. Star.  Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. , 2005 .

[15]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Just Answering … or Thinking? Contrasting Pupils' Solutions and Classifications of Missing-Value Word Problems , 2010 .

[16]  D. McDowell.  Foreword , 1999 .

[17]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Rapid cognitive assessment of learners' knowledge structures , 2006 .

[18]  Edward H. Haertel,et al.  NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS , 2000 .

[19]  R. Hembree.  Experiments and Relational Studies in Problem Solving: A Meta-Analysis. , 1992 .

[20]  Despina A. Stylianou,et al.  An examination of middle school students’ representation practices in mathematical problem solving through the lens of expert work: towards an organizing scheme , 2011 .

[21]  Susanne P. Lajoie.  Transitions and Trajectories for Studies of Expertise , 2003 .

[22]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  From Addition to Multiplication … and Back: The Development of Students’ Additive and Multiplicative Reasoning Skills , 2009 .

[23]  Stephen J. Pape,et al.  The Role of Representation(s) in Developing Mathematical Understanding , 2001 .

[24]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. , 1999 .

[25]  Rose Mary Zbiek,et al.  Developing Essential Understanding of Ratios, Proportions, and Proportional Reasoning for Teaching Mathematics: Grades 6-8 , 2010 .

[26]  Silvia Wen-Yu Lee,et al.  Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement , 2007 .

[27]  J. F. Wagner,et al.  Transfer in Pieces , 2006 .

[28]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. , 1990 .

[29]  C. W. Tate.  Solve it. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[30]  Alison G. Boardman,et al.  Efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading With Middle School Students* , 2011 .

[31]  Tad Watanabe,et al.  Developing Ratio and Proportion Schemes: A Story of a Fifth Grader. , 1997 .

[32]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom , 2005 .

[33]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Effects of Mathematical Word Problem—Solving Instruction on Middle School Students with Learning Problems , 2005 .

[34]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Rational number, ratio and proportion , 1992 .

[35]  Tao Wang,et al.  U.S. and Chinese Teachers' Conceptions and Constructions of Representations: A Case of Teaching Ratio Concept , 2006 .

[36]  Merlyn J. Behr,et al.  Number concepts and operations in the middle grades , 1988 .

[37]  B. Koichu,et al.  The effect of promoting heuristic literacy on the mathematical aptitude of middle-school students , 2007 .

[38]  Jill L. Quilici,et al.  Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. , 1996 .

[39]  Karen C. Fuson,et al.  Second graders' use of schematic drawings in solving addition and subtraction word problems. , 1989 .

[40]  A. Schoenfeld.  Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[41]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The promise of educational psychology (vol II): Teaching for meaningful learning , 2003 .

[42]  George W. Bright,et al.  Making Sense of Fractions, Ratios, and Proportions: 2002 Yearbook , 2002 .

[43]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[44]  L. Hedges.  Effect Sizes in Cluster-Randomized Designs , 2007 .

[45]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  The Effects of Schema-Broadening Instruction on Second Graders' Word-Problem Performance and Their Ability to Represent Word Problems with Algebraic Equations: A Randomized Control Study , 2010, The Elementary School Journal.

[46]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Early adolescents' proportional reasoning on ‘rate’ problems , 1983 .

[47]  Sandra P. Marshall,et al.  Schemas in Problem Solving , 1995 .

[48]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving. , 1999 .

[49]  N. Fujimura,et al.  Facilitating children's proportional reasoning: A model of reasoning processes and effects of intervention on strategy change. , 2001 .

[50]  J. Star.  Research Commentary: A Rejoinder Foregrounding Procedural Knowledge. , 2007 .

[51]  Frank R. Yekovich,et al.  Generation and Verification of Inferences by Experts and Trained Nonexperts , 1991 .

[52]  Ann Dowker,et al.  The Development of Arithmetic Concepts and Skills , 2003 .

[53]  B. Greer.  Multiplication and division as models of situations. , 1992 .

[54]  Y. Xin.  The Effect of Schema-Based Instruction in Solving Mathematics Word Problems: An Emphasis on Prealgebraic Conceptualization of Multiplicative Relations , 2008 .

[55]  Thomas P. Carpenter,et al.  Children's Mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction , 1999 .

[56]  Dor Abrahamson,et al.  Understanding ratio and proportion as an example of the apprehending zone and conceptual-phase problem-solving models. , 2004 .

[57]  Jill L. Quilici,et al.  Teaching students to recognize structural similarities between statistics word problems , 2002 .

[58]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. , 2007 .