Frontotemporal activation differs between perception of simulated cochlear implant speech and speech in background noise: An image-based fNIRS study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Aaron T. Buss | Samuel Forbes | Samuel H. Forbes | Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar | Jessica Defenderfer | Mark Hedrick | Patrick Plyler | M. Hedrick | P. Plyler | Sobanawartiny Wijeakumar | Jessica Defenderfer
[1] D. Hartley,et al. The use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy for measuring cortical reorganisation in cochlear implant users: A possible predictor of variable speech outcomes? , 2015, Cochlear implants international.
[2] R. Litovsky,et al. Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults , 2020, PloS one.
[3] T. Parrish,et al. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[4] A. Zekveld,et al. Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. , 2014, Psychophysiology.
[5] Abraham Z. Snyder,et al. A quantitative spatial comparison of high-density diffuse optical tomography and fMRI cortical mapping , 2012, NeuroImage.
[6] Aaron T. Buss,et al. Validating an image-based fNIRS approach with fMRI and a working memory task , 2017, NeuroImage.
[7] M. Beauchamp,et al. Auditory cortex activation to natural speech and simulated cochlear implant speech measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2014, Hearing Research.
[8] R. Litovsky,et al. Cortical Speech Processing in Postlingually Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users, as Revealed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy , 2018, Trends in hearing.
[9] D. Poeppel,et al. The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[10] R. Poldrack,et al. Relations between the Neural Bases of Dynamic Auditory Processing and Phonological Processing: Evidence from fMRI , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[11] Stuart Rosen,et al. A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[13] D. Hartley,et al. Brain activity underlying the recovery of meaning from degraded speech: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study , 2017, Hearing Research.
[14] Ferath Kherif,et al. Does Semantic Context Benefit Speech Understanding through “Top–Down” Processes? Evidence from Time-resolved Sparse fMRI , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[15] David A Boas,et al. Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in 3D turbid media accelerated by graphics processing units. , 2009, Optics express.
[16] P. Matthews,et al. Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.
[17] Alexander L. Francis,et al. Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort , 2016, Front. Psychol..
[18] A. Samuel,et al. Perceptual learning for speech , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[19] Ellen Leibenluft,et al. Applications of multivariate modeling to neuroimaging group analysis: A comprehensive alternative to univariate general linear model , 2014, NeuroImage.
[20] Y. Samson,et al. Lateralization of Speech and Auditory Temporal Processing , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[21] D. Gow. The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: A dual lexicon model of spoken language processing , 2012, Brain and Language.
[22] E. Formisano,et al. Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: An fMRI study employing overt speech , 2007, Human brain mapping.
[23] P Sterzer,et al. Contributions of sensory input, auditory search and verbal comprehension to cortical activity during speech processing. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.
[24] M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al. How Social Psychological Factors May Modulate Auditory and Cognitive Functioning During Listening , 2016, Ear and hearing.
[25] D. Başkent,et al. Listening effort with cochlear implant simulations. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[26] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[27] A. Friederici. The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. , 2011, Physiological reviews.
[28] Andreas Hein,et al. Characterizing the Influence of Muscle Activity in fNIRS Brain Activation Measurements , 2016 .
[29] Judit Gervain,et al. Efficient Neural Coding in Auditory and Speech Perception , 2019, Trends in Neurosciences.
[30] Ronny K. Ibrahim,et al. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG , 2017, Trends in hearing.
[31] Sophie K. Scott,et al. Semantic versus perceptual interactions in neural processing of speech-in-noise , 2013, NeuroImage.
[32] Lourdes M Delgado Reyes,et al. Early adversity in rural India impacts the brain networks underlying visual working memory , 2019, Developmental science.
[33] Martin Wolf,et al. End-tidal CO2: An important parameter for a correct interpretation in functional brain studies using speech tasks , 2013, NeuroImage.
[34] Chris James,et al. Contralateral Masking in Cochlear Implant Users with Residual Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.
[35] S Nioka,et al. Comparison of time-resolved and -unresolved measurements of deoxyhemoglobin in brain. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[36] Jonas Obleser,et al. Bilateral Speech Comprehension Reflects Differential Sensitivity to Spectral and Temporal Features , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[37] M. Botvinick,et al. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.
[38] John G. Kerns,et al. Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task , 2006, NeuroImage.
[39] P. Vuust,et al. Cortical Plasticity after Cochlear Implantation , 2013, Neural plasticity.
[40] Joanna H. Lowenstein,et al. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: “Perceptual Attention” Versus “Auditory Sensitivity” , 2016, Ear and hearing.
[41] K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al. Medial frontal cortex and response conflict: Evidence from human intracranial EEG and medial frontal cortex lesion , 2008, Brain Research.
[42] S. Petersen,et al. A dual-networks architecture of top-down control , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[43] Matthew K. Leonard,et al. Perceptual restoration of masked speech in human cortex , 2016, Nature Communications.
[44] S. Debener,et al. Rapid bilateral improvement in auditory cortex activity in postlingually deafened adults following cochlear implantation , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[45] B. J. Casey,et al. Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI , 1994, Human brain mapping.
[46] D. Calvetti,et al. Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems , 2000 .
[47] Joseph P Culver,et al. High-density diffuse optical tomography for imaging human brain function , 2019, The Review of scientific instruments.
[48] S. Scott,et al. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[49] Antoine J. Shahin,et al. Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing? , 2014, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[50] S. Scott,et al. Functional Integration across Brain Regions Improves Speech Perception under Adverse Listening Conditions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[51] J. Obleser,et al. Expectancy constraints in degraded speech modulate the language comprehension network. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[52] G. Dumont,et al. Wavelet based motion artifact removal for Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.
[53] K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al. Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning , 2004, Brain and Cognition.
[54] D. Boas,et al. HomER: a review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain. , 2009, Applied optics.
[55] Steve Majerus,et al. Modulation of brain activity during phonological familiarization , 2005, Brain and Language.
[56] Mahlega S. Hassanpour,et al. Mapping distributed brain function and networks with diffuse optical tomography , 2014, Nature Photonics.
[57] K Shoji,et al. Functional differentiation of the auditory association area in prelingually deaf subjects. , 2000, Auris, nasus, larynx.
[58] Edward E. Smith,et al. A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.
[59] S. Debener,et al. Cross-Modal Functional Reorganization of Visual and Auditory Cortex in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Identified with fNIRS , 2015, Neural plasticity.
[60] A. Villringer,et al. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): A new tool to study hemodynamic changes during activation of brain function in human adults , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.
[61] Terrin N Tamati,et al. List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[62] Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al. Functional organization of the medial frontal cortex , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[63] Susan Teubner-Rhodes,et al. Is Listening in Noise Worth It? The Neurobiology of Speech Recognition in Challenging Listening Conditions. , 2016, Ear and hearing.
[64] M. Cooke,et al. Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[65] Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al. The Cingulo-Opercular Network Provides Word-Recognition Benefit , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[66] D. Poeppel,et al. Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[67] Adam T. Eggebrecht,et al. NeuroDOT: an extensible Matlab toolbox for streamlined optical functional mapping , 2019, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.
[68] G. Christopher Stecker,et al. Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level , 2009, Hearing Research.
[69] M Wolf,et al. The confounding effect of systemic physiology on the hemodynamic response in newborns. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.
[70] Patryk A. Laurent,et al. Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.
[71] Marc Rousseaux,et al. Divided and Focused Attention in Patients with Lesion of the Prefrontal Cortex , 1996, Brain and Cognition.
[72] A. Ehlis,et al. Influence of muscle activity on brain oxygenation during verbal fluency assessed with functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2010, Neuroscience.
[73] J. Davies-Thompson,et al. Cortical correlates of speech intelligibility measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) , 2018, Hearing Research.
[74] E. Chang,et al. Human cortical sensorimotor network underlying feedback control of vocal pitch , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[75] T. Lunner,et al. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[76] Abraham Z. Snyder,et al. Statistical analysis of high density diffuse optical tomography , 2014, NeuroImage.
[77] D. Boas,et al. Non-invasive neuroimaging using near-infrared light , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.
[78] David A. Boas,et al. Improved recovery of the hemodynamic response in diffuse optical imaging using short optode separations and state-space modeling , 2011, NeuroImage.
[79] M Wolf,et al. How to detect and reduce movement artifacts in near-infrared imaging using moving standard deviation and spline interpolation , 2010, Physiological measurement.
[80] Cécile Issard,et al. Variability of the hemodynamic response in infants: Influence of experimental design and stimulus complexity , 2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.
[81] S. Nagarajan,et al. Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.
[82] Fabrice Wallois,et al. Effect of confounding variables on hemodynamic response function estimation using averaging and deconvolution analysis: An event-related NIRS study , 2017, NeuroImage.
[83] Meryem A Yücel,et al. Motion artifact detection and correction in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a new hybrid method based on spline interpolation method and Savitzky–Golay filtering , 2018, Neurophotonics.
[84] A. Savitzky,et al. Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .
[85] L Whitford,et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. , 1996, Audiology & neuro-otology.
[86] Thomas Lunner,et al. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response , 2018, Hearing Research.
[87] Marco Pelizzone,et al. Acoustic to Electric Pitch Comparisons in Cochlear Implant Subjects with Residual Hearing , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[88] Yinjuan Du,et al. Noise differentially impacts phoneme representations in the auditory and speech motor systems , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[89] F. Scholkmann,et al. The effect of inner speech on arterial CO2 and cerebral hemodynamics and oxygenation: a functional NIRS study. , 2013, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.
[90] Samuel H. Forbes,et al. Processing pipeline for image reconstructed fNIRS analysis using both MRI templates and individual anatomy , 2021, Neurophotonics.
[91] A M Dale,et al. Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.
[92] A. Villringer,et al. Illuminating the BOLD signal: combined fMRI-fNIRS studies. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[93] Michael S. Beauchamp,et al. Cortical Activation Patterns Correlate with Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation , 2016, Ear and hearing.
[94] M. Ferrari,et al. A brief review on the use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for language imaging studies in human newborns and adults , 2012, Brain and Language.
[95] C. Fiebach,et al. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.
[96] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[97] David R Moore,et al. Neural indices of listening effort in noisy environments , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[98] Ilias Tachtsidis,et al. The Effect on Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation Index of Changes in the Concentrations of Inspired Oxygen and End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide in Healthy Adult Volunteers , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[99] Masa-aki Sato,et al. Reduction of global interference of scalp-hemodynamics in functional near-infrared spectroscopy using short distance probes , 2016, NeuroImage.
[100] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Neural dissociation in processing noise and accent in spoken language comprehension , 2012, Neuropsychologia.
[101] A. Beynon,et al. Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time , 2012, PloS one.
[102] Theodore J Huppert,et al. Commentary on the statistical properties of noise and its implication on general linear models in functional near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2016, Neurophotonics.
[103] D. Poeppel,et al. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.
[104] D. Boas,et al. Effective scattering coefficient of the cerebral spinal fluid in adult head models for diffuse optical imaging. , 2006, Applied optics.
[105] Matthew B. Winn,et al. The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation , 2015, Ear and hearing.
[106] A. Hielscher,et al. Three-dimensional optical tomography of hemodynamics in the human head. , 2001, Optics express.
[107] Matthew H. Davis,et al. The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[108] Aaron T. Buss,et al. Investigating the role of temporal lobe activation in speech perception accuracy with normal hearing adults: An event-related fNIRS study , 2017, Neuropsychologia.
[109] S. Scott,et al. The Pathways for Intelligible Speech: Multivariate and Univariate Perspectives , 2013, Cerebral cortex.
[110] João Ricardo Sato,et al. Non-neuronal evoked and spontaneous hemodynamic changes in the anterior temporal region of the human head may lead to misinterpretations of functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals , 2017, Neurophotonics.
[111] Ann-Christine Ehlis,et al. The Temporal Muscle of the Head Can Cause Artifacts in Optical Imaging Studies with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[112] Paul A. Taylor,et al. FMRI Clustering in AFNI: False-Positive Rates Redux , 2017, Brain Connect..
[113] E. Toppila,et al. The effect of different noise types on the speech and non-speech elicited mismatch negativity , 2005, Hearing Research.
[114] Signy Sheldon,et al. Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[115] J. Peelle. Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior , 2017, Ear and hearing.
[116] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Hierarchical Processing in Spoken Language Comprehension , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[117] S. Scott,et al. Inferior Frontal Gyrus Activation Predicts Individual Differences in Perceptual Learning of Cochlear-Implant Simulations , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[118] A. Beynon,et al. Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients , 2012, Audiology and Neurotology.
[119] Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al. The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load , 2014, NeuroImage.
[120] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review , 2012 .
[121] P. Marquet,et al. In vivo local determination of tissue optical properties: applications to human brain. , 1999, Applied optics.
[122] Jonathan D. Cohen,et al. The Expected Value of Control: An Integrative Theory of Anterior Cingulate Cortex Function , 2013, Neuron.
[123] Thomas J. Grabowski,et al. The Left Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Participates Specifically in Accessing Lexical Phonology , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[124] R. Buxton,et al. Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[125] David A. Boas,et al. Motion artifacts in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: A comparison of motion correction techniques applied to real cognitive data , 2014, NeuroImage.
[126] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Brain regions recruited for the effortful comprehension of noise-vocoded words , 2012 .
[127] D. Levitin,et al. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients , 2016, Hearing Research.
[128] N Marangos,et al. COCHLEAR IMPLANTS , 1976, The Lancet.
[129] Jemett L. Desmond,et al. Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[130] L. Pylkkänen,et al. Adaptation to mis-pronounced speech: evidence for a prefrontal-cortex repair mechanism , 2021, Scientific reports.
[131] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Effortful Listening: The Processing of Degraded Speech Depends Critically on Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[132] J. Schnupp. Auditory Filters, Features, and Redundant Representations , 2006, Neuron.