Embedding Theory into Learning Technology Practice with Toolkits

Abstract: Expert and theoretical knowledge about the use of learning technology is not always available to practitioners. This paper illustrates one way in which practitioners can be supported in the process of engaging with theory in order to underpin practical applications in the use of learning technologies. This approach involves the design of decision-making resources, defined here as 'toolkits'. This concept is then illustrated with three practical examples. The ways in which this approach embeds specific theoretical assumptions is discussed, and a model for toolkit specification, design and evaluation is described. Editors: Simon Buckingham Shum (Open U.) Reviewers: Martyn Cooper (Open U.), Simon Buckingham Shum (Open U.) Interactive demonstrations: This article includes links to the Media Adviser Toolkit and the Evaluation Toolkit. Interactive demonstrations: This article describes the Media Adviser toolkit, which is available to download from http://www.unl.ac.uk/ltri/demos/demos.htm , and the Evaluation Toolkit [ www.ltss.bris.ac.uk/jcalt/ ]

[1]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[2]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Supporting Structured Change: Toolkits for Design and Evaluation , 2002 .

[3]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[4]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Evaluating communication and information technologies: a toolkit for practitioners , 1998 .

[5]  Jen Harvey,et al.  Using a toolkit to support the evaluation of learning , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Frank Coffield,et al.  Higher education in a learning society , 1995 .

[7]  Pd John,et al.  The Intuitive Practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing , 2000 .

[8]  Jen Harvey,et al.  A toolkit for supporting evaluation , 2001 .

[9]  T. Eagleton,et al.  The Significance Of Theory , 1990 .

[10]  Gráinne Conole Systematising learning and research information , 2002 .

[11]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Assessing and enhancing quality using toolkits , 2000 .

[12]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[13]  M. Oliver,et al.  A pedagogical framework for embedding C&IT into the curriculum , 1998 .

[14]  H. Beetham,et al.  Career development of learning technology staff: Scoping study , 2001 .

[15]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[16]  Betty Collis,et al.  Flexible learning and design of instruction , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Jen Harvey,et al.  An integrated approach to evaluating learning technologies , 2000, Proceedings International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technologies. IWALT 2000. Advanced Learning Technology: Design and Development Issues.

[18]  Gl Claxton,et al.  The Intuitive Practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing , 2000 .

[19]  Bruce Ingraham Scholarly Rhetoric in Digital Media (or: Now that we have the technology, what do we do with it?) , 2000 .

[20]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Academics' use of courseware materials: A survey , 1993 .

[21]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Assessing the Organizational Capabilities of Embedding Learning Technologies into the Undergraduate Curriculum. The Learning Technology Studio Programme: A Case Study , 1999 .

[22]  Oleg Liber,et al.  The TOOMOL project: supporting a personalised and conversational approach to learning , 2000, Comput. Educ..