Experimental and numerical investigations of the turbulent wake flow of a generic space launcher at $$M_\infty =3$$M∞=3 and $$M_\infty =6$$M∞=6

AbstractThe turbulent wake of a generic space launcher wind tunnel model with an underexpanded nozzle jet is investigated experimentally and numerically to gain insight into the variation of intricate wake flow phenomena of space vehicles at higher stages of the flight trajectory with increasing Mach number. The experiments are carried out at $$M_\infty =3$$M∞=3 and $$M_\infty =6$$M∞=6 in the Ludwieg tube test facility at the Institute of Fluid Mechanics at the Technische Universität Braunschweig, while the corresponding time-resolved computations are performed by the Institute of Aerodynamics at RWTH Aachen University using a zonal RANS–LES approach. A strong alteration of the wake topology with increasing Mach number due to the changing pressure ratio at the nozzle exit is found. At $$M_\infty =3$$M∞=3 the moderate underexpansion rate of $$p_\mathrm{e}/p_\infty \approx 5$$pe/p∞≈5 leads to a formation of a recirculation region with an elongated triangular cross-section reaching to the nozzle exit. At $$M_\infty =6$$M∞=6 a substantially stronger afterexpansion of the jet plume ($$p_\mathrm{e}/p_\infty \approx 100$$pe/p∞≈100) causes the formation of a cavity region with a quadrangular cross-section. The stronger deflection towards the nozzle at $$M_\infty =3$$M∞=3 results in lower mean and rms wall pressure ratios than at $$M_\infty =6$$M∞=6. However, due to the higher freestream pressure value at the lower Mach number the relation of absolute values is reciprocal, making the lower supersonic regime more critical with respect to dynamic structural loads. This observation is confirmed by an overall good agreement between numerical and experimental data at characteristic positions on the base and nozzle wall. Furthermore, it was shown that undesired effects of the strut support in the wake are present along the whole circumference. For $$M_\infty =3$$M∞=3 the strut influence is found to be particularly intense. The spectral analysis of wall pressure fluctuations reveals fundamental differences in the dynamic behavior of the two investigated wake flow regimes. At $$M_\infty =3$$M∞=3, a dominant frequency range around $$Sr_\mathrm{D}\approx 0.2$$SrD≈0.2 associated with the inner dynamics of the recirculation bubble is found at the base, while on the nozzle a broad-band low-frequency content of substantially higher amplitudes is detected, which is a footprint of the graduate realignment of the turbulent shear layer along the nozzle wall. The spectra at $$M_\infty =6$$M∞=6 are characterized by several high-frequency sharp peaks at $$Sr_\mathrm{D}\geqslant 0.8$$SrD⩾0.8. A strong correlation between the supported wind tunnel configuration and the axisymmetric free-flight case is found for the peaks at $$Sr_\mathrm{D}\approx 0.85$$SrD≈0.85 known to be caused by the radial flapping motion of the shear layer along the cavity.

[1]  Soshi Kawai,et al.  Computational Study of a Supersonic Base Flow Using LES/RANS Hybrid Methodology , 2004 .

[2]  Wolfgang Schröder,et al.  Investigation of the turbulent wake flow of generic launcher configurations via a zonal RANS/LES method , 2013 .

[3]  A. Guelhan,et al.  Plume-Induced Effects on the Near-Wake Region of a Generic Space Launcher Geometry , 2014 .

[4]  E. Krause,et al.  A comparison of second- and sixth-order methods for large-eddy simulations , 2002 .

[5]  J Craig Dutton,et al.  Time-Series Analysis of Supersonic Base-Pressure Fluctuations , 2003 .

[6]  A. Roshko,et al.  The compressible turbulent shear layer: an experimental study , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  D. Deprés,et al.  Analysis of Unsteadiness in Afterbody Transonic Flows , 2004 .

[8]  M. Meinke,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of the turbulent wake flow of a generic space launcher configuration , 2015 .

[9]  Klaus Hannemann,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Base Flow Buffeting on the ARIANE 5 Launcher Using High Speed PIV , 2011 .

[10]  Jiang Lu-lin,et al.  高速度可視化と時間分解PIVにより調査されたFlow Blurring噴射器の近傍場での噴霧様相 | 文献情報 | J-GLOBAL 科学技術総合リンクセンター , 2015 .

[11]  Wolfgang Schröder,et al.  A reformulated synthetic turbulence generation method for a zonal RANS–LES method and its application to zero-pressure gradient boundary layers , 2013 .

[12]  Christer Fureby,et al.  LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF SUPERSONIC AXISYMMETRIC BASEFLOW , 2003, Proceeding of Third Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[13]  J. P. Boris,et al.  New insights into large eddy simulation , 1992 .

[14]  R. Radespiel,et al.  Propulsive jet influence on generic launcher base flow , 2015 .

[15]  S. Benhamadouche,et al.  A synthetic-eddy-method for generating inflow conditions for large-eddy simulations , 2006 .

[16]  Klaus Hannemann,et al.  Launch Vehicle Base Flow Analysis Using Improved Delayed Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2015 .

[17]  C. E. Craven,et al.  Experimental investigation of base flow field at high altitude for a four engine clustered nozzle configuration , 1969 .

[18]  M. Strelets Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows , 2001 .

[19]  Wolfgang Schröder,et al.  A large-eddy simulation method for low Mach number flows using preconditioning and multigrid , 2006 .

[20]  P. Moin,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Klaus Hannemann,et al.  Launch Vehicle Base Buffeting - Recent Experimental and Numerical Investigations , 2011 .

[22]  F. Scarano,et al.  Spatio-temporal and modal analysis of unsteady fluctuations in a high-subsonic base flow , 2014 .

[23]  R. Cummings,et al.  Detached-eddy simulation with compressibility corrections applied to a supersonic axisymmetric base flow , 2002 .

[24]  John K. Eaton,et al.  A Review of Research on Subsonic Turbulent Flow Reattachment , 1981 .

[25]  H. Fasel,et al.  High-accuracy DNS of supersonic base flows and control of the near wake , 2004, 2004 Users Group Conference (DOD_UGC'04).

[26]  K. Ghia,et al.  Application of the RNG turbulence model to the simulation of axisymmetric supersonic separated base flows , 2001 .

[27]  Wolfgang Schröder,et al.  Boundary layers affected by different pressure gradients investigated computationally by a zonal RANS-LES method , 2014 .

[28]  Walter E. Hammond,et al.  Design Methodologies for Space Transportation Systems , 2001 .

[29]  Minwei Wu,et al.  Direct Numerical Simulation of a Reflected-Shock-Wave/ Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interaction , 2009 .

[30]  Rolf Radespiel,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Operation of the Hypersonic Ludwieg Tube Braunschweig , 2005 .

[31]  Philippe Druault,et al.  Experimental analysis of the pressure–velocity correlations of external unsteady flow over rocket launchers , 2013 .

[32]  M. Liou,et al.  A New Flux Splitting Scheme , 1993 .

[33]  A. Roshko,et al.  On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[34]  Ali Gülhan,et al.  Investigations on the Near-Wake Region of a Generic Space Launcher Geometry , 2011 .

[35]  Philippe Reijasse,et al.  Unsteady Transonic Flow Behind An Axisymmetric Afterbody Equipped With Two Boosters , 2007 .

[36]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[37]  Richard Benay,et al.  Two-Equation k-s Turbulence Model: Application to a Supersonic Base Flow , 2001 .

[38]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Generation of synthetic turbulent inflow data for large eddy simulation of spatially evolving wall-bounded flows , 2009 .

[39]  Rolf Radespiel,et al.  Flow quality experiment in a tandem nozzle wind tunnel at Mach 3 , 2015 .

[40]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Numerical investigation of transitional supersonic axisymmetric wakes , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[41]  S. Deck,et al.  Unsteadiness of an axisymmetric separating-reattaching flow : Numerical investigation , 2007 .

[42]  Matthias Meinke,et al.  LES of Compressible Wall-Bounded Flows , 2003 .

[43]  Rolf Radespiel,et al.  Tandem nozzle supersonic wind tunnel design , 2013 .

[44]  J. A. Rome,et al.  Transport associated with the collisionless detrapping/retrapping orbits in a nonaxisymmetric torus , 1984 .

[45]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Supersonic Base Flow Plume Interaction by Means of Particle Image Velocimetry , 2005 .

[46]  W. J. Banning,et al.  BASE FLOW / UNDEREXPANDED EXHAUST PLUME INTERACTION IN A SUPERSONIC EXTERNAL FLOW , 1998 .

[47]  S. Priebe,et al.  Direct Numerical Simulation of a eflected-Shock- Wave/Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interaction , 2009 .

[48]  P. Schmid,et al.  Analysis of pressure perturbation sources on a generic space launcher after-body in supersonic flow using zonal turbulence modeling and dynamic mode decomposition , 2015 .

[49]  P. Moin,et al.  Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited , 2012 .